SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Photo: Coastal Maine Photography / Robin Farrin)
Big Oil Threatens Maine City After Tar Sands Export Ban
Jul 24, 2014
Big Oil has always been a bad, bad loser.
And it is therefore no surprise that it has threatened to sue a small coastal city in Maine which on Monday night struck an historical blow against the industry by banning the export of tar sands from its harbour.
The decision by South Portland to approve, by 6-1, to ban tar sands exports, has catapulted this small coastal town which is famous for its scenic light-houses against the collective might of the oil industry and Canadian government.
The decision is another blow to the tar sands industry which is desperate to find ways of getting its dirty carbon-munching oil to market.
It effectively bars any attempt by the oil industry to bring oil from Alberta to the city's port, the second-largest oil terminal on the east coast of the US.
The move has ramifications for the tar sands industry, because it was planning to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline to carry tar sands to the coast.
South Portland Mayor Jerry Jalbert told Reuters the vote was an exercise in local democracy. "From the perspective of a locally elected official, it's a simple issue. People fear this product could be damaging to the community, and they have asked us to act."
Hundreds of supporters, wearing light blue T-shirts had packed into the hall where the vote was taking place. They were part of the so-called "Clear Skies Ordinance" worried about local spills and the impact of the tar sands on climate change.
One of the activists, Peg Dilley, from Casco, Maine, said: "This is not just a South Portland issue. This is not just a great state of Maine issue. This is an international issue."
After the vote, activists were ecstatic, standing to applause the local councillors. "This victory sends an important message to communities around the country," said Lisa Pohlmann, executive director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine. "It shows that we can stand up against a dirty, toxic form of energy, and that it's not inevitable."
"We may be a small city, but, boy, we've done a big thing," added Mary-Jane Ferrier, spokeswoman for Protect South Portland, who led the campaign. "We know it may not be over yet, and we're committed to defend this victory from oil industry attacks."
It is only a matter of time before those legal attacks start coming. The oil industry's main lobbying organisation and attack-dog, the American Petroleum Institute, earlier this year had warned South Portland officials they would "face strong legal challenges," if they voted to ban oil exports.
Yesterday, they were said to be considering their options. Tom Hardison, vice president of the company that runs the pipeline, said the vote was "against jobs, energy and the waterfront," and called it a "rush to judgment."
One local energy association has also claimed that "The fight is not over."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
Big Oil has always been a bad, bad loser.
And it is therefore no surprise that it has threatened to sue a small coastal city in Maine which on Monday night struck an historical blow against the industry by banning the export of tar sands from its harbour.
The decision by South Portland to approve, by 6-1, to ban tar sands exports, has catapulted this small coastal town which is famous for its scenic light-houses against the collective might of the oil industry and Canadian government.
The decision is another blow to the tar sands industry which is desperate to find ways of getting its dirty carbon-munching oil to market.
It effectively bars any attempt by the oil industry to bring oil from Alberta to the city's port, the second-largest oil terminal on the east coast of the US.
The move has ramifications for the tar sands industry, because it was planning to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline to carry tar sands to the coast.
South Portland Mayor Jerry Jalbert told Reuters the vote was an exercise in local democracy. "From the perspective of a locally elected official, it's a simple issue. People fear this product could be damaging to the community, and they have asked us to act."
Hundreds of supporters, wearing light blue T-shirts had packed into the hall where the vote was taking place. They were part of the so-called "Clear Skies Ordinance" worried about local spills and the impact of the tar sands on climate change.
One of the activists, Peg Dilley, from Casco, Maine, said: "This is not just a South Portland issue. This is not just a great state of Maine issue. This is an international issue."
After the vote, activists were ecstatic, standing to applause the local councillors. "This victory sends an important message to communities around the country," said Lisa Pohlmann, executive director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine. "It shows that we can stand up against a dirty, toxic form of energy, and that it's not inevitable."
"We may be a small city, but, boy, we've done a big thing," added Mary-Jane Ferrier, spokeswoman for Protect South Portland, who led the campaign. "We know it may not be over yet, and we're committed to defend this victory from oil industry attacks."
It is only a matter of time before those legal attacks start coming. The oil industry's main lobbying organisation and attack-dog, the American Petroleum Institute, earlier this year had warned South Portland officials they would "face strong legal challenges," if they voted to ban oil exports.
Yesterday, they were said to be considering their options. Tom Hardison, vice president of the company that runs the pipeline, said the vote was "against jobs, energy and the waterfront," and called it a "rush to judgment."
One local energy association has also claimed that "The fight is not over."
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
Big Oil has always been a bad, bad loser.
And it is therefore no surprise that it has threatened to sue a small coastal city in Maine which on Monday night struck an historical blow against the industry by banning the export of tar sands from its harbour.
The decision by South Portland to approve, by 6-1, to ban tar sands exports, has catapulted this small coastal town which is famous for its scenic light-houses against the collective might of the oil industry and Canadian government.
The decision is another blow to the tar sands industry which is desperate to find ways of getting its dirty carbon-munching oil to market.
It effectively bars any attempt by the oil industry to bring oil from Alberta to the city's port, the second-largest oil terminal on the east coast of the US.
The move has ramifications for the tar sands industry, because it was planning to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline to carry tar sands to the coast.
South Portland Mayor Jerry Jalbert told Reuters the vote was an exercise in local democracy. "From the perspective of a locally elected official, it's a simple issue. People fear this product could be damaging to the community, and they have asked us to act."
Hundreds of supporters, wearing light blue T-shirts had packed into the hall where the vote was taking place. They were part of the so-called "Clear Skies Ordinance" worried about local spills and the impact of the tar sands on climate change.
One of the activists, Peg Dilley, from Casco, Maine, said: "This is not just a South Portland issue. This is not just a great state of Maine issue. This is an international issue."
After the vote, activists were ecstatic, standing to applause the local councillors. "This victory sends an important message to communities around the country," said Lisa Pohlmann, executive director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine. "It shows that we can stand up against a dirty, toxic form of energy, and that it's not inevitable."
"We may be a small city, but, boy, we've done a big thing," added Mary-Jane Ferrier, spokeswoman for Protect South Portland, who led the campaign. "We know it may not be over yet, and we're committed to defend this victory from oil industry attacks."
It is only a matter of time before those legal attacks start coming. The oil industry's main lobbying organisation and attack-dog, the American Petroleum Institute, earlier this year had warned South Portland officials they would "face strong legal challenges," if they voted to ban oil exports.
Yesterday, they were said to be considering their options. Tom Hardison, vice president of the company that runs the pipeline, said the vote was "against jobs, energy and the waterfront," and called it a "rush to judgment."
One local energy association has also claimed that "The fight is not over."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.