Following the success of Shareables' map jams project with local sharing groups from across the world, the Sharing Spring aims to bring together the leaders behind these solutions and spark a mass movement for economic sharing. Inspired by the people power movements for social justice that have swept the world since 2011, in particular the Arab Spring, Occupy and the Indignados, the Sharing Spring will highlight the grassroots alternatives that already exist to economic, environmental or social challenges but don't rely on governments for their implementation. As Shareable state on their website: "While creating a new economy requires political change, that takes time. People need solutions now. ...Yet, there's still little awareness of the options people have to take hold of their economic destinies right now."
A quiet revolution
Union leader Sara Horowitz calls the new economy built on sharing a "quiet revolution" that is being driven by millions of ordinary people who no longer want to prop up a faltering mainstream economy "with endless and thoughtless consumption". In a growing rejection of the work-to-consume treadmill, she sees the sharing economy as a non-vocal and as yet non-politicised movement in which people naturally share their resources (time, money, material goods and services) as a way of "attacking the system by abdicating from it". She argues that it's being driven by people who are aware of the ecological, societal and financial impact of their actions, and who desire to reconnect with each other and build their own solutions to the many challenges we face - because governments and corporations that prioritise profit and short-term gains are clearly failing to meet everyone's needs. Furthermore, it is a movement that implicitly understands how the earth's natural resources are limited, and how the consumption-driven pathway pursued by governments is unsustainable in social and economic as well as ecological terms.
From STWR's point of view, what's also important to recognise at this time of converging crises is that many millions of people are taking to the streets to demand that governments play an essential role in sharing resources. These more politicised movements for sharing are taking many diverse forms, such as the Moral Marchers in North Carolina that call for a fairer sharing of government revenue on behalf of the common good, as similarly reflected in the 'Brazilian Spring' of 2013 that called for the right priorities in public spending. From Wall Street to Gezi Park to the Puerta del Sol, an implicit call for economic sharing is also embodied in the widespread mobilisations for an alternative to austerity measures; for a fairer distribution of wealth and income through redistributive policies and tax justice; for participatory democracy and a shared political demos; for the sharing and conservation of natural resources; and for shared public spaces and the non-enclosure of the commons.
The ultimate Sharing Spring
There are also many signs that progressives are beginning to realise the transformative potential of sharing on national and global levels, and not only within our own communities. As Professor Julian Agyeman et al write in a think-piece for Friends of the Earth (FOE), for example, today's "revival of economic sharing could be spread globally, and underpin a revival of political sharing". Their brief survey of contemporary sharing activity concludes that "there are few resources as yet untouched by the sharing culture, but... there are opportunities for much greater active support for collective sharing behaviours in co-production and in the political domain." Mike Childs, a veteran environmental campaigner at FOE, further argues that sharing can be a counter-cultural movement that pushes back the individualistic and materialistic assumptions that underpin government policies, and provides the impetus to develop an environmentally and socially sustainable economic model.
Perhaps herein lies the ultimate potential of a Sharing Spring: firstly, to raise awareness of the need for economic sharing as a solution to critical global issues, such as ecodestruction, climate change, unsustainable food systems, consumerism and growth-mania, corporatocracy and the inequitable distribution of wealth and income. And secondly, to realise the power that lies in the hands of ordinary people when that shared awareness is translated into a mass grassroots movement that can influence government decisions. It is right and imperative that local forms of sharing are scaled up in response to unmet community needs, especially when people come together to pool and share resources on the basis of mutual aid. But it is equally important that citizens of all nations reclaim their democratic right to a 'government of the people, by the people, for the people', and call upon their political representatives to integrate the principle of sharing into governmental policies.
As written on STWR's page on a global movement for sharing: "In the end, the case for global economic sharing can be summarised with a simple appeal to our common humanity and compassion. Only a collective demand for a sustainable and more equal world is likely to unify citizens of both the richest and poorest nations on a common platform. ...If the case for sharing on an international basis captures the public imagination as quickly as the calls for redistribution within individual countries, then an end to gross inequality, ecological crisis and global conflict could finally become a realistic possibility."
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Following the success of Shareables' map jams project with local sharing groups from across the world, the Sharing Spring aims to bring together the leaders behind these solutions and spark a mass movement for economic sharing. Inspired by the people power movements for social justice that have swept the world since 2011, in particular the Arab Spring, Occupy and the Indignados, the Sharing Spring will highlight the grassroots alternatives that already exist to economic, environmental or social challenges but don't rely on governments for their implementation. As Shareable state on their website: "While creating a new economy requires political change, that takes time. People need solutions now. ...Yet, there's still little awareness of the options people have to take hold of their economic destinies right now."
A quiet revolution
Union leader Sara Horowitz calls the new economy built on sharing a "quiet revolution" that is being driven by millions of ordinary people who no longer want to prop up a faltering mainstream economy "with endless and thoughtless consumption". In a growing rejection of the work-to-consume treadmill, she sees the sharing economy as a non-vocal and as yet non-politicised movement in which people naturally share their resources (time, money, material goods and services) as a way of "attacking the system by abdicating from it". She argues that it's being driven by people who are aware of the ecological, societal and financial impact of their actions, and who desire to reconnect with each other and build their own solutions to the many challenges we face - because governments and corporations that prioritise profit and short-term gains are clearly failing to meet everyone's needs. Furthermore, it is a movement that implicitly understands how the earth's natural resources are limited, and how the consumption-driven pathway pursued by governments is unsustainable in social and economic as well as ecological terms.
From STWR's point of view, what's also important to recognise at this time of converging crises is that many millions of people are taking to the streets to demand that governments play an essential role in sharing resources. These more politicised movements for sharing are taking many diverse forms, such as the Moral Marchers in North Carolina that call for a fairer sharing of government revenue on behalf of the common good, as similarly reflected in the 'Brazilian Spring' of 2013 that called for the right priorities in public spending. From Wall Street to Gezi Park to the Puerta del Sol, an implicit call for economic sharing is also embodied in the widespread mobilisations for an alternative to austerity measures; for a fairer distribution of wealth and income through redistributive policies and tax justice; for participatory democracy and a shared political demos; for the sharing and conservation of natural resources; and for shared public spaces and the non-enclosure of the commons.
The ultimate Sharing Spring
There are also many signs that progressives are beginning to realise the transformative potential of sharing on national and global levels, and not only within our own communities. As Professor Julian Agyeman et al write in a think-piece for Friends of the Earth (FOE), for example, today's "revival of economic sharing could be spread globally, and underpin a revival of political sharing". Their brief survey of contemporary sharing activity concludes that "there are few resources as yet untouched by the sharing culture, but... there are opportunities for much greater active support for collective sharing behaviours in co-production and in the political domain." Mike Childs, a veteran environmental campaigner at FOE, further argues that sharing can be a counter-cultural movement that pushes back the individualistic and materialistic assumptions that underpin government policies, and provides the impetus to develop an environmentally and socially sustainable economic model.
Perhaps herein lies the ultimate potential of a Sharing Spring: firstly, to raise awareness of the need for economic sharing as a solution to critical global issues, such as ecodestruction, climate change, unsustainable food systems, consumerism and growth-mania, corporatocracy and the inequitable distribution of wealth and income. And secondly, to realise the power that lies in the hands of ordinary people when that shared awareness is translated into a mass grassroots movement that can influence government decisions. It is right and imperative that local forms of sharing are scaled up in response to unmet community needs, especially when people come together to pool and share resources on the basis of mutual aid. But it is equally important that citizens of all nations reclaim their democratic right to a 'government of the people, by the people, for the people', and call upon their political representatives to integrate the principle of sharing into governmental policies.
As written on STWR's page on a global movement for sharing: "In the end, the case for global economic sharing can be summarised with a simple appeal to our common humanity and compassion. Only a collective demand for a sustainable and more equal world is likely to unify citizens of both the richest and poorest nations on a common platform. ...If the case for sharing on an international basis captures the public imagination as quickly as the calls for redistribution within individual countries, then an end to gross inequality, ecological crisis and global conflict could finally become a realistic possibility."
Following the success of Shareables' map jams project with local sharing groups from across the world, the Sharing Spring aims to bring together the leaders behind these solutions and spark a mass movement for economic sharing. Inspired by the people power movements for social justice that have swept the world since 2011, in particular the Arab Spring, Occupy and the Indignados, the Sharing Spring will highlight the grassroots alternatives that already exist to economic, environmental or social challenges but don't rely on governments for their implementation. As Shareable state on their website: "While creating a new economy requires political change, that takes time. People need solutions now. ...Yet, there's still little awareness of the options people have to take hold of their economic destinies right now."
A quiet revolution
Union leader Sara Horowitz calls the new economy built on sharing a "quiet revolution" that is being driven by millions of ordinary people who no longer want to prop up a faltering mainstream economy "with endless and thoughtless consumption". In a growing rejection of the work-to-consume treadmill, she sees the sharing economy as a non-vocal and as yet non-politicised movement in which people naturally share their resources (time, money, material goods and services) as a way of "attacking the system by abdicating from it". She argues that it's being driven by people who are aware of the ecological, societal and financial impact of their actions, and who desire to reconnect with each other and build their own solutions to the many challenges we face - because governments and corporations that prioritise profit and short-term gains are clearly failing to meet everyone's needs. Furthermore, it is a movement that implicitly understands how the earth's natural resources are limited, and how the consumption-driven pathway pursued by governments is unsustainable in social and economic as well as ecological terms.
From STWR's point of view, what's also important to recognise at this time of converging crises is that many millions of people are taking to the streets to demand that governments play an essential role in sharing resources. These more politicised movements for sharing are taking many diverse forms, such as the Moral Marchers in North Carolina that call for a fairer sharing of government revenue on behalf of the common good, as similarly reflected in the 'Brazilian Spring' of 2013 that called for the right priorities in public spending. From Wall Street to Gezi Park to the Puerta del Sol, an implicit call for economic sharing is also embodied in the widespread mobilisations for an alternative to austerity measures; for a fairer distribution of wealth and income through redistributive policies and tax justice; for participatory democracy and a shared political demos; for the sharing and conservation of natural resources; and for shared public spaces and the non-enclosure of the commons.
The ultimate Sharing Spring
There are also many signs that progressives are beginning to realise the transformative potential of sharing on national and global levels, and not only within our own communities. As Professor Julian Agyeman et al write in a think-piece for Friends of the Earth (FOE), for example, today's "revival of economic sharing could be spread globally, and underpin a revival of political sharing". Their brief survey of contemporary sharing activity concludes that "there are few resources as yet untouched by the sharing culture, but... there are opportunities for much greater active support for collective sharing behaviours in co-production and in the political domain." Mike Childs, a veteran environmental campaigner at FOE, further argues that sharing can be a counter-cultural movement that pushes back the individualistic and materialistic assumptions that underpin government policies, and provides the impetus to develop an environmentally and socially sustainable economic model.
Perhaps herein lies the ultimate potential of a Sharing Spring: firstly, to raise awareness of the need for economic sharing as a solution to critical global issues, such as ecodestruction, climate change, unsustainable food systems, consumerism and growth-mania, corporatocracy and the inequitable distribution of wealth and income. And secondly, to realise the power that lies in the hands of ordinary people when that shared awareness is translated into a mass grassroots movement that can influence government decisions. It is right and imperative that local forms of sharing are scaled up in response to unmet community needs, especially when people come together to pool and share resources on the basis of mutual aid. But it is equally important that citizens of all nations reclaim their democratic right to a 'government of the people, by the people, for the people', and call upon their political representatives to integrate the principle of sharing into governmental policies.
As written on STWR's page on a global movement for sharing: "In the end, the case for global economic sharing can be summarised with a simple appeal to our common humanity and compassion. Only a collective demand for a sustainable and more equal world is likely to unify citizens of both the richest and poorest nations on a common platform. ...If the case for sharing on an international basis captures the public imagination as quickly as the calls for redistribution within individual countries, then an end to gross inequality, ecological crisis and global conflict could finally become a realistic possibility."