SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
House GOP: No Free Lunch for 200,000 Poor Kids
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
May 18, 2013
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.