SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
House GOP: No Free Lunch for 200,000 Poor Kids
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
May 18, 2013
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
It was bad enough that Republicans from Newt Gingrich on down derided Barack Obama as the "food stamp President" during the last campaign.
Now they're trying to take food stamps out of the hands of the hungry.
On Wednesday, the House Ag Committee voted to cut $21 billion out of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
The cuts would yank food stamps away from 2 million people, and get this: 200,000 poor and hungry kids would no longer able to get free school lunches.
Republicans spin stories like Ronald Reagan used to, saying that lottery winners shouldn't have access to food stamps. I doubt there are many lottery winners getting this benefit.
They also say that we need to cut food stamps to reduce the budget deficit.
First, the deficit isn't the problem they make it out to be.
And second, food stamps are a tiny, tiny portion of federal expenditures.
And third, the poor and the hungry shouldn't have to suffer because of Wall Street's excesses and George Bush's wars.
If Republicans wanted to make reasonable cuts out of the Farm Bill, they should have gone after corporate welfare to the giant food companies.
But no, they'd rather take a poor kid's meal away.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.