SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A Recession for the 93 Percent, Good Times for the 7 Percent
Apr 24, 2013
As we struggle to fully recover from the Great Recession, it has become increasingly clear that the wealthy not only recovered much more quickly than the rest of the country, they managed to increase their wealth even though most households saw a net loss. A new Pew report finds that during the first two years of the economic recovery, the mean net worth of households in the top 7 percent of wealth distribution rose by an estimated 28 percent, as shown in the graph below.
The increase in wealth for the top 7 percent is due to the fact that the stock and bond market rallied during 2009 to 2011 while the housing market remained stagnant. In households with a net worth of $500,000 or more, 65 percent of their wealth comes from financial holdings, such as stock, bonds and 401(k) accounts. Just 17 percent of their wealth comes from their home. Households with less than $500,000 net worth, on the other hand, get only 33 percent of their wealth from financial assets and 50 percent comes from their home. A stagnant housing market disproprotionately impacts less wealthy households because more of their wealth is held in their home.
Not surprisingly, this increase in wealth for the top 7 percent further increased wealth inequality. The wealthy 7 percent of households now hold nearly two-thirds of all wealth in the country.
There are two points here that need to be made. One, the reason the stock and bond market was able to recovery so quickly was because of direct government support to the banks. As just one example, in 2008, JP Morgan Chase's stock rose 10 percent after the Federal Reserve guaranteed $30 billion to cover Bear Stearns liabilities to prevent Bear from going bankrupt and disrupting the JP Morgan/Bear Stearns merger. The move increased JP Morgan's capitalization by more than $12 billion. In effect, the move enriched the company's shareholders by $12 billion. This bailout came at the same time struggling homeowners were not getting relief because, as President Bush said, "we got to be careful and mindful that any time the government intervenes in the market, it must do so with clear purpose and great care."
Second, the Pew report's cutoff for the 93 percentile is a household net worth of $836,033. The average household net worth is just $77,300. For communities of color, the average net household worth drops to just $10,824. If anything, the Pew study doesn't tell the full extent to which the wealthy advanced over the average household, particularly the average household in communities of color.
This latest report shows how it is the rich, not the poor, that benefit from government handouts. It was direct government support with taxpayer funds that saved the big banks and, in turn, enriched their shareholders. It's not social safety net programs that are bankrupting our country: it's the rich.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
J. Mijin Cha
J. Mijin Cha is the Associate Director of PolicyLink where she works in the 'Equity as a Superior Growth Model' program. Prior to PolicyLink, Mijin worked at Demos, where she authored several reports on money in politics, voting reforms, and new measures of economic progress. She has also spent several years working on environmental justice and green economy policy issues internationally and domestically.
As we struggle to fully recover from the Great Recession, it has become increasingly clear that the wealthy not only recovered much more quickly than the rest of the country, they managed to increase their wealth even though most households saw a net loss. A new Pew report finds that during the first two years of the economic recovery, the mean net worth of households in the top 7 percent of wealth distribution rose by an estimated 28 percent, as shown in the graph below.
The increase in wealth for the top 7 percent is due to the fact that the stock and bond market rallied during 2009 to 2011 while the housing market remained stagnant. In households with a net worth of $500,000 or more, 65 percent of their wealth comes from financial holdings, such as stock, bonds and 401(k) accounts. Just 17 percent of their wealth comes from their home. Households with less than $500,000 net worth, on the other hand, get only 33 percent of their wealth from financial assets and 50 percent comes from their home. A stagnant housing market disproprotionately impacts less wealthy households because more of their wealth is held in their home.
Not surprisingly, this increase in wealth for the top 7 percent further increased wealth inequality. The wealthy 7 percent of households now hold nearly two-thirds of all wealth in the country.
There are two points here that need to be made. One, the reason the stock and bond market was able to recovery so quickly was because of direct government support to the banks. As just one example, in 2008, JP Morgan Chase's stock rose 10 percent after the Federal Reserve guaranteed $30 billion to cover Bear Stearns liabilities to prevent Bear from going bankrupt and disrupting the JP Morgan/Bear Stearns merger. The move increased JP Morgan's capitalization by more than $12 billion. In effect, the move enriched the company's shareholders by $12 billion. This bailout came at the same time struggling homeowners were not getting relief because, as President Bush said, "we got to be careful and mindful that any time the government intervenes in the market, it must do so with clear purpose and great care."
Second, the Pew report's cutoff for the 93 percentile is a household net worth of $836,033. The average household net worth is just $77,300. For communities of color, the average net household worth drops to just $10,824. If anything, the Pew study doesn't tell the full extent to which the wealthy advanced over the average household, particularly the average household in communities of color.
This latest report shows how it is the rich, not the poor, that benefit from government handouts. It was direct government support with taxpayer funds that saved the big banks and, in turn, enriched their shareholders. It's not social safety net programs that are bankrupting our country: it's the rich.
J. Mijin Cha
J. Mijin Cha is the Associate Director of PolicyLink where she works in the 'Equity as a Superior Growth Model' program. Prior to PolicyLink, Mijin worked at Demos, where she authored several reports on money in politics, voting reforms, and new measures of economic progress. She has also spent several years working on environmental justice and green economy policy issues internationally and domestically.
As we struggle to fully recover from the Great Recession, it has become increasingly clear that the wealthy not only recovered much more quickly than the rest of the country, they managed to increase their wealth even though most households saw a net loss. A new Pew report finds that during the first two years of the economic recovery, the mean net worth of households in the top 7 percent of wealth distribution rose by an estimated 28 percent, as shown in the graph below.
The increase in wealth for the top 7 percent is due to the fact that the stock and bond market rallied during 2009 to 2011 while the housing market remained stagnant. In households with a net worth of $500,000 or more, 65 percent of their wealth comes from financial holdings, such as stock, bonds and 401(k) accounts. Just 17 percent of their wealth comes from their home. Households with less than $500,000 net worth, on the other hand, get only 33 percent of their wealth from financial assets and 50 percent comes from their home. A stagnant housing market disproprotionately impacts less wealthy households because more of their wealth is held in their home.
Not surprisingly, this increase in wealth for the top 7 percent further increased wealth inequality. The wealthy 7 percent of households now hold nearly two-thirds of all wealth in the country.
There are two points here that need to be made. One, the reason the stock and bond market was able to recovery so quickly was because of direct government support to the banks. As just one example, in 2008, JP Morgan Chase's stock rose 10 percent after the Federal Reserve guaranteed $30 billion to cover Bear Stearns liabilities to prevent Bear from going bankrupt and disrupting the JP Morgan/Bear Stearns merger. The move increased JP Morgan's capitalization by more than $12 billion. In effect, the move enriched the company's shareholders by $12 billion. This bailout came at the same time struggling homeowners were not getting relief because, as President Bush said, "we got to be careful and mindful that any time the government intervenes in the market, it must do so with clear purpose and great care."
Second, the Pew report's cutoff for the 93 percentile is a household net worth of $836,033. The average household net worth is just $77,300. For communities of color, the average net household worth drops to just $10,824. If anything, the Pew study doesn't tell the full extent to which the wealthy advanced over the average household, particularly the average household in communities of color.
This latest report shows how it is the rich, not the poor, that benefit from government handouts. It was direct government support with taxpayer funds that saved the big banks and, in turn, enriched their shareholders. It's not social safety net programs that are bankrupting our country: it's the rich.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.