Welcome to 'Poverty Day': The One Time of Year When America Cares About the Poor
Yesterday, the US Census Bureau released its annual data on income, poverty and health insurance coverage. This kicks off the one week every year when we can absolutely count on a veritable frenzy of stories and headlines about poverty. The other fifty-one weeks? Not so much.
As Hannah Mathews, director of childcare and early education at CLASP, puts it, "As is tradition on 'poverty day,' journalists, advocates and politicians alike will express outrage for the dismal poverty statistics.... But by week's end, it's far too likely that the poor among us will have fallen out of consciousness."
Nevertheless, there were definitely some great materials released by antipoverty advocates and experts yesterday that deserve attention. Below is just a small sample.
While the headlines will read that the poverty rate held steady, the most important takeaways for me from the new data are these: we need to stop looking at poverty as a separate phenomenon from the rest of the economy--an economy with a proliferation of low-wage jobs and a weak and inequitable recovery; and we especially need to stop viewing those who live in poverty as suffering from some sort of character flaw, as opposed to paying the heaviest price for our skewed priorities and choices.

Finally, a quick glance at the numbers emphasizes just how easily poverty could grow significantly worse with some of the cuts to the safety net that are currently being proposed.
Friday, I'll post a video of interviews with people for whom the new Census numbers are not newsworthy at all--because they are living in poverty, and don't need the data in order to explain just how difficult it is to rise out of it. Until then, here are some key numbers that describe poverty in American in 2011:
Poverty remained flat: 46.2 million people--15 percent of the population--lived on less than $23,021 annually for a family of four.
Child poverty remained flat: 16.1 million children--22 percent of all children--lived in poverty, including over 37 percent of African-American children.
Children under age 5 in poverty: Over 5 million--25 percent of all children under age 5--including over 42 percent of African-American children, and 36 percent of Latino children in that age group.
People who would have been in poverty if not for Social Security: 67.6 million (program kept 21.4 million people out of poverty).
Income inequality: Incomes fell for the bottom four-fifths of US households, rising only for the top one-fifth.
Gender gap, 2011: Women 34 percent more likely to be poor than men.
Gender gap, 2010: Women 29 percent more likely to be poor than women.
Change in average household income, middle 20 percent: -$876, or -1.7 percent
Change in average household income, top 5 percent: +$15,184, or +5.1 percent
Change in median income for full-time, year-round workers: -2.5 percent
Income quintile with largest growth in number of full-time, year-round workers: bottom 20 percent, with a 17.3 percent increase in FTYR workers.
Unemployment insurance (UI) income: fell by $36 billion (25 percent), due in part to benefits declining as Recovery Act provisions expired.
Unemployment insurance, 2010: lifted 3.2 million people out of poverty.
Unemployment insurance, 2011: lifted 2.3 million people out of poverty.
Federal UI benefits scheduled to end entirely, for everybody: December 31, 2012
Number and percentage of uninsured Americans: fell by 1.3 million, from 16.3 percent to 15.7 percent, largest annual improvement since 1999; 40 percent of that decline is attributable to persons ages 19-25, as a result of Affordable Care Act allowing individuals to remain on their parents' policies until age 26.
Earned Income Tax Credit: would have lifted 5.7 million people--including 3.1 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate under 13.2 percent.
SNAP (food stamps): would have lifted 3.9 million people--including 1.7 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate down to 13.7 percent.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Yesterday, the US Census Bureau released its annual data on income, poverty and health insurance coverage. This kicks off the one week every year when we can absolutely count on a veritable frenzy of stories and headlines about poverty. The other fifty-one weeks? Not so much.
As Hannah Mathews, director of childcare and early education at CLASP, puts it, "As is tradition on 'poverty day,' journalists, advocates and politicians alike will express outrage for the dismal poverty statistics.... But by week's end, it's far too likely that the poor among us will have fallen out of consciousness."
Nevertheless, there were definitely some great materials released by antipoverty advocates and experts yesterday that deserve attention. Below is just a small sample.
While the headlines will read that the poverty rate held steady, the most important takeaways for me from the new data are these: we need to stop looking at poverty as a separate phenomenon from the rest of the economy--an economy with a proliferation of low-wage jobs and a weak and inequitable recovery; and we especially need to stop viewing those who live in poverty as suffering from some sort of character flaw, as opposed to paying the heaviest price for our skewed priorities and choices.

Finally, a quick glance at the numbers emphasizes just how easily poverty could grow significantly worse with some of the cuts to the safety net that are currently being proposed.
Friday, I'll post a video of interviews with people for whom the new Census numbers are not newsworthy at all--because they are living in poverty, and don't need the data in order to explain just how difficult it is to rise out of it. Until then, here are some key numbers that describe poverty in American in 2011:
Poverty remained flat: 46.2 million people--15 percent of the population--lived on less than $23,021 annually for a family of four.
Child poverty remained flat: 16.1 million children--22 percent of all children--lived in poverty, including over 37 percent of African-American children.
Children under age 5 in poverty: Over 5 million--25 percent of all children under age 5--including over 42 percent of African-American children, and 36 percent of Latino children in that age group.
People who would have been in poverty if not for Social Security: 67.6 million (program kept 21.4 million people out of poverty).
Income inequality: Incomes fell for the bottom four-fifths of US households, rising only for the top one-fifth.
Gender gap, 2011: Women 34 percent more likely to be poor than men.
Gender gap, 2010: Women 29 percent more likely to be poor than women.
Change in average household income, middle 20 percent: -$876, or -1.7 percent
Change in average household income, top 5 percent: +$15,184, or +5.1 percent
Change in median income for full-time, year-round workers: -2.5 percent
Income quintile with largest growth in number of full-time, year-round workers: bottom 20 percent, with a 17.3 percent increase in FTYR workers.
Unemployment insurance (UI) income: fell by $36 billion (25 percent), due in part to benefits declining as Recovery Act provisions expired.
Unemployment insurance, 2010: lifted 3.2 million people out of poverty.
Unemployment insurance, 2011: lifted 2.3 million people out of poverty.
Federal UI benefits scheduled to end entirely, for everybody: December 31, 2012
Number and percentage of uninsured Americans: fell by 1.3 million, from 16.3 percent to 15.7 percent, largest annual improvement since 1999; 40 percent of that decline is attributable to persons ages 19-25, as a result of Affordable Care Act allowing individuals to remain on their parents' policies until age 26.
Earned Income Tax Credit: would have lifted 5.7 million people--including 3.1 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate under 13.2 percent.
SNAP (food stamps): would have lifted 3.9 million people--including 1.7 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate down to 13.7 percent.
Yesterday, the US Census Bureau released its annual data on income, poverty and health insurance coverage. This kicks off the one week every year when we can absolutely count on a veritable frenzy of stories and headlines about poverty. The other fifty-one weeks? Not so much.
As Hannah Mathews, director of childcare and early education at CLASP, puts it, "As is tradition on 'poverty day,' journalists, advocates and politicians alike will express outrage for the dismal poverty statistics.... But by week's end, it's far too likely that the poor among us will have fallen out of consciousness."
Nevertheless, there were definitely some great materials released by antipoverty advocates and experts yesterday that deserve attention. Below is just a small sample.
While the headlines will read that the poverty rate held steady, the most important takeaways for me from the new data are these: we need to stop looking at poverty as a separate phenomenon from the rest of the economy--an economy with a proliferation of low-wage jobs and a weak and inequitable recovery; and we especially need to stop viewing those who live in poverty as suffering from some sort of character flaw, as opposed to paying the heaviest price for our skewed priorities and choices.

Finally, a quick glance at the numbers emphasizes just how easily poverty could grow significantly worse with some of the cuts to the safety net that are currently being proposed.
Friday, I'll post a video of interviews with people for whom the new Census numbers are not newsworthy at all--because they are living in poverty, and don't need the data in order to explain just how difficult it is to rise out of it. Until then, here are some key numbers that describe poverty in American in 2011:
Poverty remained flat: 46.2 million people--15 percent of the population--lived on less than $23,021 annually for a family of four.
Child poverty remained flat: 16.1 million children--22 percent of all children--lived in poverty, including over 37 percent of African-American children.
Children under age 5 in poverty: Over 5 million--25 percent of all children under age 5--including over 42 percent of African-American children, and 36 percent of Latino children in that age group.
People who would have been in poverty if not for Social Security: 67.6 million (program kept 21.4 million people out of poverty).
Income inequality: Incomes fell for the bottom four-fifths of US households, rising only for the top one-fifth.
Gender gap, 2011: Women 34 percent more likely to be poor than men.
Gender gap, 2010: Women 29 percent more likely to be poor than women.
Change in average household income, middle 20 percent: -$876, or -1.7 percent
Change in average household income, top 5 percent: +$15,184, or +5.1 percent
Change in median income for full-time, year-round workers: -2.5 percent
Income quintile with largest growth in number of full-time, year-round workers: bottom 20 percent, with a 17.3 percent increase in FTYR workers.
Unemployment insurance (UI) income: fell by $36 billion (25 percent), due in part to benefits declining as Recovery Act provisions expired.
Unemployment insurance, 2010: lifted 3.2 million people out of poverty.
Unemployment insurance, 2011: lifted 2.3 million people out of poverty.
Federal UI benefits scheduled to end entirely, for everybody: December 31, 2012
Number and percentage of uninsured Americans: fell by 1.3 million, from 16.3 percent to 15.7 percent, largest annual improvement since 1999; 40 percent of that decline is attributable to persons ages 19-25, as a result of Affordable Care Act allowing individuals to remain on their parents' policies until age 26.
Earned Income Tax Credit: would have lifted 5.7 million people--including 3.1 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate under 13.2 percent.
SNAP (food stamps): would have lifted 3.9 million people--including 1.7 million children--out of poverty if counted in the poverty measure, bringing poverty rate down to 13.7 percent.

