SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The activists behind the egg-as-person movement--which wants to convey the full rights of personhood under the law on fertilized eggs--have failed in their bid for another ballot initiative (third time's the charm!) in Colorado. Only 82,000 of the more than 112,000 signatures submitted to the office of the secretary of state were able to be validated.
According to Fox News Denver, "Secretary of State Scott Gessler announced Wednesday that the group behind the proposed ballot measure fell 3,859 signatures short of the 86,105 they needed to qualify for the November ballot."
If true, that means that approximately 30,000 signatures, or 25 percent of those gathered were unable to be verified. However, the Colorado Personhood Coalition rejects the state's claims and said that they will sue to have the rejected signatures reviewed.
"The law states that we have 30 days to file a challenge, and we fully intend to do so. Based on the Secretary of State's 5% sample, we have calculated that we will be able to recover the signatures necessary to appear on the ballot," said Personhood USA legal analyst for Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D., via press release .
"This disqualification is by an extremely narrow number, and as we have seen thousands of valid voter signatures discarded unnecessarily, we will be filing a challenge to ensure that every Colorado voter's voice is heard, and that every signature counts."
The "personhood" amendment was on the ballot in Colorado in both the 2008 and 2010 elections. The initiatives were soundly rejected both times.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The activists behind the egg-as-person movement--which wants to convey the full rights of personhood under the law on fertilized eggs--have failed in their bid for another ballot initiative (third time's the charm!) in Colorado. Only 82,000 of the more than 112,000 signatures submitted to the office of the secretary of state were able to be validated.
According to Fox News Denver, "Secretary of State Scott Gessler announced Wednesday that the group behind the proposed ballot measure fell 3,859 signatures short of the 86,105 they needed to qualify for the November ballot."
If true, that means that approximately 30,000 signatures, or 25 percent of those gathered were unable to be verified. However, the Colorado Personhood Coalition rejects the state's claims and said that they will sue to have the rejected signatures reviewed.
"The law states that we have 30 days to file a challenge, and we fully intend to do so. Based on the Secretary of State's 5% sample, we have calculated that we will be able to recover the signatures necessary to appear on the ballot," said Personhood USA legal analyst for Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D., via press release .
"This disqualification is by an extremely narrow number, and as we have seen thousands of valid voter signatures discarded unnecessarily, we will be filing a challenge to ensure that every Colorado voter's voice is heard, and that every signature counts."
The "personhood" amendment was on the ballot in Colorado in both the 2008 and 2010 elections. The initiatives were soundly rejected both times.
The activists behind the egg-as-person movement--which wants to convey the full rights of personhood under the law on fertilized eggs--have failed in their bid for another ballot initiative (third time's the charm!) in Colorado. Only 82,000 of the more than 112,000 signatures submitted to the office of the secretary of state were able to be validated.
According to Fox News Denver, "Secretary of State Scott Gessler announced Wednesday that the group behind the proposed ballot measure fell 3,859 signatures short of the 86,105 they needed to qualify for the November ballot."
If true, that means that approximately 30,000 signatures, or 25 percent of those gathered were unable to be verified. However, the Colorado Personhood Coalition rejects the state's claims and said that they will sue to have the rejected signatures reviewed.
"The law states that we have 30 days to file a challenge, and we fully intend to do so. Based on the Secretary of State's 5% sample, we have calculated that we will be able to recover the signatures necessary to appear on the ballot," said Personhood USA legal analyst for Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D., via press release .
"This disqualification is by an extremely narrow number, and as we have seen thousands of valid voter signatures discarded unnecessarily, we will be filing a challenge to ensure that every Colorado voter's voice is heard, and that every signature counts."
The "personhood" amendment was on the ballot in Colorado in both the 2008 and 2010 elections. The initiatives were soundly rejected both times.