

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
There is a grumble being repeated in some progressive circles. It goes like this: "President Obama has been a disappointment. But what's the alternative?" It's usually followed by a sigh and a plea for work to save the "few minor" things we did get done in the last three years.

But this grumbling is largely wrong. Some of the disappointment is understandable. For instance, on the President's watch, thousands of immigrant families have been torn apart by inhumane deportation policies
Even so, our achievements are by no means minor. The stimulus contained the largest expansion of anti-poverty programs in a generation, health care reform is already expanding coverage for millions of people, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has been consigned to the history books, and efforts to slash Medicare and Social Security have been held in check.
From where I stand, something more interesting is going on. We've examined ourselves and found a fundamental weakness: We placed too much hope and faith in the president. It was a mistake, but not because this president has somehow betrayed us. He's done what presidents do: governed under all the stresses of competing pressures.
It was a mistake because we--not just the president--have to be the agents of change in our society. Electoral victories without sustained movements will never address inequality, poverty, or any of the major issues we face. Abolitionists gave us abolition, not Lincoln. Powerful movements focus on issues, not on presidents. The civil rights movement gave us voting rights for blacks. The suffragette movement gave women the right to vote. The gay rights movement gave gays the right to marry and put an end to "Don't Ask Don't Tell." Union victories created the modern middle class.
Increasingly, those who are engaging in this more interesting conversation are asking: How do we extend our electoral organizing beyond the elections?
This is a far more exciting question because answering it correctly will give us a chance at the real prize: building a society governed by progressive values and policies that move us all forward together.
At the Center for Community Change, we've been doing this with immigration policy. We are turning outrage over the administration's massive deportations into action to enhance the power of immigrants in our society. Our "Change Takes Courage" campaign holds the White House accountable for tearing families apart. At the same time, we send a clear message to all those who oppose immigration reform by making our voter registration and voter turnout work be first and foremost about raising the power of immigrants to make sure their voices are heard in all ways, not just at the ballot box.
So the grumbling is waning as enthusiasm for the 2012 election is rising, because we are starting to figure out that elections aren't really about candidates--they are about us, about what we can be doing to create change, and about the society that together we all hope to build.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
There is a grumble being repeated in some progressive circles. It goes like this: "President Obama has been a disappointment. But what's the alternative?" It's usually followed by a sigh and a plea for work to save the "few minor" things we did get done in the last three years.

But this grumbling is largely wrong. Some of the disappointment is understandable. For instance, on the President's watch, thousands of immigrant families have been torn apart by inhumane deportation policies
Even so, our achievements are by no means minor. The stimulus contained the largest expansion of anti-poverty programs in a generation, health care reform is already expanding coverage for millions of people, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has been consigned to the history books, and efforts to slash Medicare and Social Security have been held in check.
From where I stand, something more interesting is going on. We've examined ourselves and found a fundamental weakness: We placed too much hope and faith in the president. It was a mistake, but not because this president has somehow betrayed us. He's done what presidents do: governed under all the stresses of competing pressures.
It was a mistake because we--not just the president--have to be the agents of change in our society. Electoral victories without sustained movements will never address inequality, poverty, or any of the major issues we face. Abolitionists gave us abolition, not Lincoln. Powerful movements focus on issues, not on presidents. The civil rights movement gave us voting rights for blacks. The suffragette movement gave women the right to vote. The gay rights movement gave gays the right to marry and put an end to "Don't Ask Don't Tell." Union victories created the modern middle class.
Increasingly, those who are engaging in this more interesting conversation are asking: How do we extend our electoral organizing beyond the elections?
This is a far more exciting question because answering it correctly will give us a chance at the real prize: building a society governed by progressive values and policies that move us all forward together.
At the Center for Community Change, we've been doing this with immigration policy. We are turning outrage over the administration's massive deportations into action to enhance the power of immigrants in our society. Our "Change Takes Courage" campaign holds the White House accountable for tearing families apart. At the same time, we send a clear message to all those who oppose immigration reform by making our voter registration and voter turnout work be first and foremost about raising the power of immigrants to make sure their voices are heard in all ways, not just at the ballot box.
So the grumbling is waning as enthusiasm for the 2012 election is rising, because we are starting to figure out that elections aren't really about candidates--they are about us, about what we can be doing to create change, and about the society that together we all hope to build.
There is a grumble being repeated in some progressive circles. It goes like this: "President Obama has been a disappointment. But what's the alternative?" It's usually followed by a sigh and a plea for work to save the "few minor" things we did get done in the last three years.

But this grumbling is largely wrong. Some of the disappointment is understandable. For instance, on the President's watch, thousands of immigrant families have been torn apart by inhumane deportation policies
Even so, our achievements are by no means minor. The stimulus contained the largest expansion of anti-poverty programs in a generation, health care reform is already expanding coverage for millions of people, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" has been consigned to the history books, and efforts to slash Medicare and Social Security have been held in check.
From where I stand, something more interesting is going on. We've examined ourselves and found a fundamental weakness: We placed too much hope and faith in the president. It was a mistake, but not because this president has somehow betrayed us. He's done what presidents do: governed under all the stresses of competing pressures.
It was a mistake because we--not just the president--have to be the agents of change in our society. Electoral victories without sustained movements will never address inequality, poverty, or any of the major issues we face. Abolitionists gave us abolition, not Lincoln. Powerful movements focus on issues, not on presidents. The civil rights movement gave us voting rights for blacks. The suffragette movement gave women the right to vote. The gay rights movement gave gays the right to marry and put an end to "Don't Ask Don't Tell." Union victories created the modern middle class.
Increasingly, those who are engaging in this more interesting conversation are asking: How do we extend our electoral organizing beyond the elections?
This is a far more exciting question because answering it correctly will give us a chance at the real prize: building a society governed by progressive values and policies that move us all forward together.
At the Center for Community Change, we've been doing this with immigration policy. We are turning outrage over the administration's massive deportations into action to enhance the power of immigrants in our society. Our "Change Takes Courage" campaign holds the White House accountable for tearing families apart. At the same time, we send a clear message to all those who oppose immigration reform by making our voter registration and voter turnout work be first and foremost about raising the power of immigrants to make sure their voices are heard in all ways, not just at the ballot box.
So the grumbling is waning as enthusiasm for the 2012 election is rising, because we are starting to figure out that elections aren't really about candidates--they are about us, about what we can be doing to create change, and about the society that together we all hope to build.