SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Note to NPR: Fight Back
Why Fox News Will Keep Bullying NPR Until They Stand Up and Push Back
Mar 18, 2011
In the wake of the James O'Keefe smear campaign against NPR, which arrived in the form of dishonestly edited undercover tapes (does O'Keefe know any other form?), public radio host Ira Glass expressed dismay that nobody was "fighting back" against the right-wing attacks. "I find it completely annoying, and I don't understand it," said Glass.
Instead of fighting back against the right-wing attacks led by Fox News, NPR hit the panic button last week. It prematurely condemned a colleague and got busy "rolling bodies out the back of the truck," as the New York Times' David Carr put it, referencing the public sacking of CEO Vivian Schiller and senior fundraiser Ron Schiller, who was featured in the O'Keefe tapes. Both were made sacrificial lambs for the O'Keefe stings; lambs that were sacrificed before the full truth about theunethical tapes were revealed.
Note to NPR: If you don't stand up, the bullying is never going to stop.
It seems obvious that Fox's odd, deeply personal hatred for the venerable news institution comes from the very top. Roger Ailes recently likened NPR executives to members of Hitler's Nazi regime. Y'know, the Nazis who sought to conquer Europe and eradicate Jews. That's who Ailes compared NPR executives to. (Ailes later apologized to the ADL for using the Nazi term. Ailes though, refused to apologize to NPR.)
Meaning, the brand of radical conservative who has NPR in their sights today is not the same type of conservative critic who tweaked the network's supposedly liberal bias in the past. This new brand of bully is borderline delusional about NPR and sees it as a genuine force of evil; a hub of sinister activity.
For years when confronted with partisan taunts from the right, NPR took the high road and let its journalism speak for itself. The thinking seemed to be that sensible people could distinguish between the award-winning work the network produced and the unfair mischaracterization of NPR that got paraded around by conservatives. Also, in terms of landing critical funding support on Capitol Hill, public brawls with conservatives were frowned upon. (It's unseemly.) So low-key won out the day.
And for years that noble approach worked. But the game has changed. Against its will, NPR has been dragged into the arena for a showdown and is now seen by its frothing critics as partisan prey. Fox News senses weakness and feasts off it.
More weakness was advertised last week when, in the wake of her resignation, CEO Schiller suggested her stepping down might placate her critics and improve NPR's chances of securing funding:
I'm hopeful that my departure from NPR will have the intended effect of easing the defunding pressure on public broadcasting.
No such luck. This week Republicans responded to Schiller's resignation by convening an "emergency" session of the House Rules Committee to consider a bill that would permanently strip NPR of its federal funding.
As Earl Ofari Hutchinson recently noted at Huffington Post:
In fact, NPR could clean house of every top official and its top programmers and it still wouldn't satisfy its GOP inquisitors. The GOP's point is not to just change the regime at NPR but to drive home the message that the media is the sole playground for corporate, right of center, views and that anything or anyone who doesn't toe that line will find no regular place in front of public or mainstream microphones or on the airwaves.
Meanwhile, NPR itself hasn't done itself any favors with the kind of news coverage it's produced when sugar coating dirty trickster James O'Keefe's background. Instead, of being factually accurate and noting that O'Keefe's reputation as an undercover "journalist" had been pretty much destroyed by his own misguided stunts and unethical behavior in the editing room, NPR has routinely glossed over that unpleasantness. (More recently, NPR has been more clear about O'Keefe's past.)
In other words, while NPR empowered O'Keefe and presented him as a legitimate newsmaker, O'Keefe used that mainstream media stature and prestige to plot an attack against NPR in hopes of crippling the venerable news agency.
Sadly, that dynamic isn't unusual among Beltway journalists. When conservatives work the refs and condemn reporters for being liberally biased, what's the best way to prove you're not liberal? You bend over backwards when covering conservatives like O'Keefe. (Just like you bend over backwards when covering the Republican Bush administration.)
Fact: Faced with a bully like Fox News, NPR ought to do less placating and a more fighting back.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Media Matters for America
In the wake of the James O'Keefe smear campaign against NPR, which arrived in the form of dishonestly edited undercover tapes (does O'Keefe know any other form?), public radio host Ira Glass expressed dismay that nobody was "fighting back" against the right-wing attacks. "I find it completely annoying, and I don't understand it," said Glass.
Instead of fighting back against the right-wing attacks led by Fox News, NPR hit the panic button last week. It prematurely condemned a colleague and got busy "rolling bodies out the back of the truck," as the New York Times' David Carr put it, referencing the public sacking of CEO Vivian Schiller and senior fundraiser Ron Schiller, who was featured in the O'Keefe tapes. Both were made sacrificial lambs for the O'Keefe stings; lambs that were sacrificed before the full truth about theunethical tapes were revealed.
Note to NPR: If you don't stand up, the bullying is never going to stop.
It seems obvious that Fox's odd, deeply personal hatred for the venerable news institution comes from the very top. Roger Ailes recently likened NPR executives to members of Hitler's Nazi regime. Y'know, the Nazis who sought to conquer Europe and eradicate Jews. That's who Ailes compared NPR executives to. (Ailes later apologized to the ADL for using the Nazi term. Ailes though, refused to apologize to NPR.)
Meaning, the brand of radical conservative who has NPR in their sights today is not the same type of conservative critic who tweaked the network's supposedly liberal bias in the past. This new brand of bully is borderline delusional about NPR and sees it as a genuine force of evil; a hub of sinister activity.
For years when confronted with partisan taunts from the right, NPR took the high road and let its journalism speak for itself. The thinking seemed to be that sensible people could distinguish between the award-winning work the network produced and the unfair mischaracterization of NPR that got paraded around by conservatives. Also, in terms of landing critical funding support on Capitol Hill, public brawls with conservatives were frowned upon. (It's unseemly.) So low-key won out the day.
And for years that noble approach worked. But the game has changed. Against its will, NPR has been dragged into the arena for a showdown and is now seen by its frothing critics as partisan prey. Fox News senses weakness and feasts off it.
More weakness was advertised last week when, in the wake of her resignation, CEO Schiller suggested her stepping down might placate her critics and improve NPR's chances of securing funding:
I'm hopeful that my departure from NPR will have the intended effect of easing the defunding pressure on public broadcasting.
No such luck. This week Republicans responded to Schiller's resignation by convening an "emergency" session of the House Rules Committee to consider a bill that would permanently strip NPR of its federal funding.
As Earl Ofari Hutchinson recently noted at Huffington Post:
In fact, NPR could clean house of every top official and its top programmers and it still wouldn't satisfy its GOP inquisitors. The GOP's point is not to just change the regime at NPR but to drive home the message that the media is the sole playground for corporate, right of center, views and that anything or anyone who doesn't toe that line will find no regular place in front of public or mainstream microphones or on the airwaves.
Meanwhile, NPR itself hasn't done itself any favors with the kind of news coverage it's produced when sugar coating dirty trickster James O'Keefe's background. Instead, of being factually accurate and noting that O'Keefe's reputation as an undercover "journalist" had been pretty much destroyed by his own misguided stunts and unethical behavior in the editing room, NPR has routinely glossed over that unpleasantness. (More recently, NPR has been more clear about O'Keefe's past.)
In other words, while NPR empowered O'Keefe and presented him as a legitimate newsmaker, O'Keefe used that mainstream media stature and prestige to plot an attack against NPR in hopes of crippling the venerable news agency.
Sadly, that dynamic isn't unusual among Beltway journalists. When conservatives work the refs and condemn reporters for being liberally biased, what's the best way to prove you're not liberal? You bend over backwards when covering conservatives like O'Keefe. (Just like you bend over backwards when covering the Republican Bush administration.)
Fact: Faced with a bully like Fox News, NPR ought to do less placating and a more fighting back.
In the wake of the James O'Keefe smear campaign against NPR, which arrived in the form of dishonestly edited undercover tapes (does O'Keefe know any other form?), public radio host Ira Glass expressed dismay that nobody was "fighting back" against the right-wing attacks. "I find it completely annoying, and I don't understand it," said Glass.
Instead of fighting back against the right-wing attacks led by Fox News, NPR hit the panic button last week. It prematurely condemned a colleague and got busy "rolling bodies out the back of the truck," as the New York Times' David Carr put it, referencing the public sacking of CEO Vivian Schiller and senior fundraiser Ron Schiller, who was featured in the O'Keefe tapes. Both were made sacrificial lambs for the O'Keefe stings; lambs that were sacrificed before the full truth about theunethical tapes were revealed.
Note to NPR: If you don't stand up, the bullying is never going to stop.
It seems obvious that Fox's odd, deeply personal hatred for the venerable news institution comes from the very top. Roger Ailes recently likened NPR executives to members of Hitler's Nazi regime. Y'know, the Nazis who sought to conquer Europe and eradicate Jews. That's who Ailes compared NPR executives to. (Ailes later apologized to the ADL for using the Nazi term. Ailes though, refused to apologize to NPR.)
Meaning, the brand of radical conservative who has NPR in their sights today is not the same type of conservative critic who tweaked the network's supposedly liberal bias in the past. This new brand of bully is borderline delusional about NPR and sees it as a genuine force of evil; a hub of sinister activity.
For years when confronted with partisan taunts from the right, NPR took the high road and let its journalism speak for itself. The thinking seemed to be that sensible people could distinguish between the award-winning work the network produced and the unfair mischaracterization of NPR that got paraded around by conservatives. Also, in terms of landing critical funding support on Capitol Hill, public brawls with conservatives were frowned upon. (It's unseemly.) So low-key won out the day.
And for years that noble approach worked. But the game has changed. Against its will, NPR has been dragged into the arena for a showdown and is now seen by its frothing critics as partisan prey. Fox News senses weakness and feasts off it.
More weakness was advertised last week when, in the wake of her resignation, CEO Schiller suggested her stepping down might placate her critics and improve NPR's chances of securing funding:
I'm hopeful that my departure from NPR will have the intended effect of easing the defunding pressure on public broadcasting.
No such luck. This week Republicans responded to Schiller's resignation by convening an "emergency" session of the House Rules Committee to consider a bill that would permanently strip NPR of its federal funding.
As Earl Ofari Hutchinson recently noted at Huffington Post:
In fact, NPR could clean house of every top official and its top programmers and it still wouldn't satisfy its GOP inquisitors. The GOP's point is not to just change the regime at NPR but to drive home the message that the media is the sole playground for corporate, right of center, views and that anything or anyone who doesn't toe that line will find no regular place in front of public or mainstream microphones or on the airwaves.
Meanwhile, NPR itself hasn't done itself any favors with the kind of news coverage it's produced when sugar coating dirty trickster James O'Keefe's background. Instead, of being factually accurate and noting that O'Keefe's reputation as an undercover "journalist" had been pretty much destroyed by his own misguided stunts and unethical behavior in the editing room, NPR has routinely glossed over that unpleasantness. (More recently, NPR has been more clear about O'Keefe's past.)
In other words, while NPR empowered O'Keefe and presented him as a legitimate newsmaker, O'Keefe used that mainstream media stature and prestige to plot an attack against NPR in hopes of crippling the venerable news agency.
Sadly, that dynamic isn't unusual among Beltway journalists. When conservatives work the refs and condemn reporters for being liberally biased, what's the best way to prove you're not liberal? You bend over backwards when covering conservatives like O'Keefe. (Just like you bend over backwards when covering the Republican Bush administration.)
Fact: Faced with a bully like Fox News, NPR ought to do less placating and a more fighting back.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.