Will Congress Give Obama the 'Mubarak Option'?
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.