The State of the Union: What the President Should Say
The President will have to devote a big part of
his speech to the economy, but which economy? Corporate profits are up
but jobs and wages remain in the doldrums. People with lots of financial
assets, or who are deemed "talent" by large corporations, are enjoying a
solid recovery. But most Americans continue to struggle.
The President will have to devote a big part of
his speech to the economy, but which economy? Corporate profits are up
but jobs and wages remain in the doldrums. People with lots of financial
assets, or who are deemed "talent" by large corporations, are enjoying a
solid recovery. But most Americans continue to struggle.
In order for the public to understand what must
be done, the President has to be clear about what has happened and why.
Corporations are profiting from sales of their foreign operations,
especially in China and India. Here at home, they're catering to rich
Americans. But an important key to their profits is their reduced costs,
especially payrolls. The result has been fewer jobs and lower pay.
The Great Recession accelerated trends starting
three decades ago -- outsourcing abroad, automating work, converting
full-time jobs to temps and contracts, undermining unions, and getting
wage and benefit concessions from remaining workers. The Internet and
software have made all this easier.
He should point out that the U.S. economy is now
twice as large as it was in 1980 but the real median wage has barely
budged. Most of the benefits of economic growth have gone to the top. In
the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of Americans got about 9 percent
of total income. By the start of the Great Recession they received more
than 23 percent. Wealth is even more concentrated.
This is the heart of our problem. Most Americans
no longer have the purchasing power to get the economy moving again.
Once the debt bubble burst, they were stranded.
The President should make it clear corporations
aren't to blame. After all, they're designed to make profits. Nor is it
the fault of the rich who have played by the rules. The problem is the
rules need fixing. He should stress that a future with no jobs or lousy
jobs for most Americans is not sustainable - not even for American
corporations, whose long-term profitability depends on the revival of
broad-based domestic demand. (Watch out for the upcoming "correction.")
The solution is to give average Americans a better economic deal.
For starters, he should propose to expand the
Earned Income Tax Credit (essentially, a wage subsidy) all the way up
through the middle class. And he should make the tax system more
progressive: The rate on the first $50,000 to $90,000 of income should
be cut to 10 percent; the next $90,000 to $150,000, 20 percent; and the
next $150,000 to $250,000, 30 percent. Make up the revenue by increasing
taxes on the next $250,000 to $500,000, to 40 percent; from $500,000 to
$5 million, to 50 percent; and anything over $5 million, 60 percent.
Tax capital gains the same as ordinary income.
In addition, he should call for strengthening unions by increasing penalties on employers who illegally deter them.
He will have to call for reducing the long-term
budget deficit, but must make sure to distinguish between public
investments that build future productivity (education, infrastructure,
and basic R&D) and expenditures that improve our lives or keep us
safe today. The former -- essentially the nation's "capital expenditures"
-- shouldn't be cut at all. Indeed, they should be substantially
increased. A "capital budget" separate from the regular federal budget
would help draw this fundamental distinction.
Finally, he should recommend that Congress make
college affordable by allowing federal loans to be repaid as 10 percent
of earnings for the first 10 years of full-time employment.
Importantly, he should make it clear this isn't
redistribution. These measures would be good for everyone. Rich
Americans will do better with smaller share of a rapidly-growing economy
than a large share of one that remains in a deep hole.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The President will have to devote a big part of
his speech to the economy, but which economy? Corporate profits are up
but jobs and wages remain in the doldrums. People with lots of financial
assets, or who are deemed "talent" by large corporations, are enjoying a
solid recovery. But most Americans continue to struggle.
In order for the public to understand what must
be done, the President has to be clear about what has happened and why.
Corporations are profiting from sales of their foreign operations,
especially in China and India. Here at home, they're catering to rich
Americans. But an important key to their profits is their reduced costs,
especially payrolls. The result has been fewer jobs and lower pay.
The Great Recession accelerated trends starting
three decades ago -- outsourcing abroad, automating work, converting
full-time jobs to temps and contracts, undermining unions, and getting
wage and benefit concessions from remaining workers. The Internet and
software have made all this easier.
He should point out that the U.S. economy is now
twice as large as it was in 1980 but the real median wage has barely
budged. Most of the benefits of economic growth have gone to the top. In
the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of Americans got about 9 percent
of total income. By the start of the Great Recession they received more
than 23 percent. Wealth is even more concentrated.
This is the heart of our problem. Most Americans
no longer have the purchasing power to get the economy moving again.
Once the debt bubble burst, they were stranded.
The President should make it clear corporations
aren't to blame. After all, they're designed to make profits. Nor is it
the fault of the rich who have played by the rules. The problem is the
rules need fixing. He should stress that a future with no jobs or lousy
jobs for most Americans is not sustainable - not even for American
corporations, whose long-term profitability depends on the revival of
broad-based domestic demand. (Watch out for the upcoming "correction.")
The solution is to give average Americans a better economic deal.
For starters, he should propose to expand the
Earned Income Tax Credit (essentially, a wage subsidy) all the way up
through the middle class. And he should make the tax system more
progressive: The rate on the first $50,000 to $90,000 of income should
be cut to 10 percent; the next $90,000 to $150,000, 20 percent; and the
next $150,000 to $250,000, 30 percent. Make up the revenue by increasing
taxes on the next $250,000 to $500,000, to 40 percent; from $500,000 to
$5 million, to 50 percent; and anything over $5 million, 60 percent.
Tax capital gains the same as ordinary income.
In addition, he should call for strengthening unions by increasing penalties on employers who illegally deter them.
He will have to call for reducing the long-term
budget deficit, but must make sure to distinguish between public
investments that build future productivity (education, infrastructure,
and basic R&D) and expenditures that improve our lives or keep us
safe today. The former -- essentially the nation's "capital expenditures"
-- shouldn't be cut at all. Indeed, they should be substantially
increased. A "capital budget" separate from the regular federal budget
would help draw this fundamental distinction.
Finally, he should recommend that Congress make
college affordable by allowing federal loans to be repaid as 10 percent
of earnings for the first 10 years of full-time employment.
Importantly, he should make it clear this isn't
redistribution. These measures would be good for everyone. Rich
Americans will do better with smaller share of a rapidly-growing economy
than a large share of one that remains in a deep hole.
The President will have to devote a big part of
his speech to the economy, but which economy? Corporate profits are up
but jobs and wages remain in the doldrums. People with lots of financial
assets, or who are deemed "talent" by large corporations, are enjoying a
solid recovery. But most Americans continue to struggle.
In order for the public to understand what must
be done, the President has to be clear about what has happened and why.
Corporations are profiting from sales of their foreign operations,
especially in China and India. Here at home, they're catering to rich
Americans. But an important key to their profits is their reduced costs,
especially payrolls. The result has been fewer jobs and lower pay.
The Great Recession accelerated trends starting
three decades ago -- outsourcing abroad, automating work, converting
full-time jobs to temps and contracts, undermining unions, and getting
wage and benefit concessions from remaining workers. The Internet and
software have made all this easier.
He should point out that the U.S. economy is now
twice as large as it was in 1980 but the real median wage has barely
budged. Most of the benefits of economic growth have gone to the top. In
the late 1970s, the richest 1 percent of Americans got about 9 percent
of total income. By the start of the Great Recession they received more
than 23 percent. Wealth is even more concentrated.
This is the heart of our problem. Most Americans
no longer have the purchasing power to get the economy moving again.
Once the debt bubble burst, they were stranded.
The President should make it clear corporations
aren't to blame. After all, they're designed to make profits. Nor is it
the fault of the rich who have played by the rules. The problem is the
rules need fixing. He should stress that a future with no jobs or lousy
jobs for most Americans is not sustainable - not even for American
corporations, whose long-term profitability depends on the revival of
broad-based domestic demand. (Watch out for the upcoming "correction.")
The solution is to give average Americans a better economic deal.
For starters, he should propose to expand the
Earned Income Tax Credit (essentially, a wage subsidy) all the way up
through the middle class. And he should make the tax system more
progressive: The rate on the first $50,000 to $90,000 of income should
be cut to 10 percent; the next $90,000 to $150,000, 20 percent; and the
next $150,000 to $250,000, 30 percent. Make up the revenue by increasing
taxes on the next $250,000 to $500,000, to 40 percent; from $500,000 to
$5 million, to 50 percent; and anything over $5 million, 60 percent.
Tax capital gains the same as ordinary income.
In addition, he should call for strengthening unions by increasing penalties on employers who illegally deter them.
He will have to call for reducing the long-term
budget deficit, but must make sure to distinguish between public
investments that build future productivity (education, infrastructure,
and basic R&D) and expenditures that improve our lives or keep us
safe today. The former -- essentially the nation's "capital expenditures"
-- shouldn't be cut at all. Indeed, they should be substantially
increased. A "capital budget" separate from the regular federal budget
would help draw this fundamental distinction.
Finally, he should recommend that Congress make
college affordable by allowing federal loans to be repaid as 10 percent
of earnings for the first 10 years of full-time employment.
Importantly, he should make it clear this isn't
redistribution. These measures would be good for everyone. Rich
Americans will do better with smaller share of a rapidly-growing economy
than a large share of one that remains in a deep hole.