Patriotic Millionaires Explain That Tax Cuts for the Rich Don't Grow the Economy

Congressional Democrats have announced that they will organize votes during the lame-duck session on extending tax cuts for the 98 percent of American taxpayers who are not rich.

Congressional Republicans now face a choice.

Will they vote for tax cuts that just about everyone supports? Or
will they kill the initiative because it does not preserve tax breaks
for the 2 percent of Americans who are rich?

In the real world, that's not a tough call. Mainstream Republicans of
the previous generation would have voted with the Democrats.
Mainstream Republicans of the generation before that would have led the
charge. Remember that during the president of Dwight Eisenhower, a
Republican who frequently worked with a Republican Congress, the
highest marginal tax rate was 91 percent; most Republicans in those
days recognized that they represented Main Street not Wall Street.

It's different now.

There are still a few mainstream Republicans in the House and Senate.
But, for the most part, the new face of the Republican Party is much
richer-44 percent of members of Congress are millionaires-and much more
responsive to the rich.

So it probably won't help to simply suggest to the GOP that they
should side with the 98 percent majority of Americans whose tax cuts
could be preserved.

Fair enough.

Let's bring in some millionaires.

In a letter to President Obama, members of the group Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength argue that it is time, again, to tax the rich.

"We are writing to urge you to stand firm against those who would put politics ahead of their country. For the fiscal health of our nation and the well-being of our fellow citizens, we ask that you allow tax cuts on incomes over $1,000,000 to expire at the end of this year as scheduled," they write. "We make this request as loyal citizens who now or in the past earned an income of $1,000,000 per year or more.
We have done very well over the last several years. Now, during our
nation's moment of need, we are eager to do our fair share. We don't
need more tax cuts, and we understand that cutting our taxes will
increase the deficit and the debt burden carried by other taxpayers.
The country needs to meet its financial obligations in a just and
responsible way."

"Letting tax cuts for incomes over $1,000,000 expire, is an important
step in that direction," conclude the more than three dozen
millionaire signers of the letter, a group that includes a number of
Google executives, active CEOs and philanthropists such as Ben &
Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen.

Millionaires know how to work with numbers. And the Patriotic Millionaires are sharing a few numbers with members of Congress who might be interested in making policy based on facts rather than a hunch. For instance:

• Only 375,000 Americans have incomes of over $1,000,000.
• Between 1979 and 2007, incomes for the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans rose by 281 percent.
• In the 1950s and early 1960s, a period when growth was high and
  unemployment was low, millionaires had a top marginal tax rate of 91
  percent.
• In 1976, millionaires had a top marginal tax rate of 70 percent.
• Today, millionaires have a top marginal tax rate of 35 percent.
• Reducing the income tax on top earners is one of the most
  inefficient ways to grow the economy, according to the nonpartisan
  Congressional Budget Office.
• Letting tax cuts for the top 2 percent-which were never meant to be
  permanent-expire as scheduled would pay down the federal debt by $700
  billion over the next ten years.

Those numbers of worthy of note. Worthy enough to suggest that
congressional Republicans would be well advised to take their cue from
the rich when it comes to tax policy-so long as the rich folks we're
talking about are Patriotic Millionaires.