Aug 12, 2010
Recently over in the sweltering, surreal wasteland that is Las Vegas
did I participate in a curious and fascinating event, one that did not
at all involve strippers, donkeys or hallucinogenic unicorns on the
moon. Well, mostly.
The gathering was mounted by a big San Francisco ad agency and
one of its clever leaders, a sort of boot camp/team building thing they
put on a few times a year so new employees can test their mettle, strain
their brainstems and come up with radically new ideas for a particular,
usually imaginary product, as they stay up all night, drink too much
Red Bull and discover their thresholds for being crammed together into
smallish hotel rooms for four days straight without showering.
I was there to present myself, my new book "The Daring Spectacle,"
my recent adventure in self-publishing. I was there, along with a
lovely young marketing whiz named Amy from Simon & Shuster in New
York, to talk up the state of the printed book in the age of
iPad/Kindle/eBook, to mourn the collapse of the traditional publishing
business, to give my independent-author side of what is increasingly
being called the tragic collapse of the publishing world overall.
I was there, in other words, because not only did I recently shun
traditional publishing and put out a printed book on my own, but I also
started my own little publishing corporation (called Rapture Machine)
to do it. And my story was perhaps helpful, because for this particular
event, these ad teams were tasked with one of most challenging questions
facing modern media today, one that's near and dear to my heart, my
medium and my livelihood: How to save/reinvent book publishing. And they
had about 72 hours to do it.
I won't go into all the ideas and reimaginings they came up with
-- there isn't space enough here, nor time. But I do want to focus on
two surprises and one dramatic realization that popped out, and none of
them has to do with how I lost, won, lost and then walked away about
$100 ahead at blackjack over three days. Awesome.
I was first sort of amazed to learn just how few of these
otherwise smart and well-informed folk had much of an idea how the book
business works, from imprints to distribution, contracts to cover art.
No one really knew how books get made, who makes which decisions, how
little control authors have, what we're expected to do nowadays, and so
on.
So immersed am I in the wicked funhouse of medialand, it struck
me that few in the general populace know -- or care -- how it all works.
Not that they should, but still.
No big deal, that. But it ties straight into the second surprise,
which was far more troubling, albeit still understandable. For few also
seemed to have much sense of just how bad it's become for books and
authors, how much corporate consolidation has occurred, how increasingly
extinct is the "undiscovered author" or killer book deal, how few
writers can make a living at their craft anymore.
This has been brutally true in newspapers and journalism for
nearly a decade now (hell, due to even more corporate budget slashings,
this very column, after 10 years, has just been cut down from twice to
once a week, starting, well, right now. Stick with me here).
But it might be even worse for books. Because everyone sort of takes books for granted; they've always been here, haven't they? And they've always been awesome? And easily available? Hell, everyone loves books. Everyone owns books, has a cherished memory or 10 about them. How bad can it be?
It's bad. Amazon might skew its numbers and claim that Kindle
editions are outselling traditional hardbacks (not exactly true), but
nevertheless, the printed book itself is in dire shape. Fewer new
voices, fewer risks, far less money flowing through the industry
overall. When's the last time you were in a bookstore? How many new
authors can you name in the past few years whose books aren't lame
knockoffs of cheeseball teen vampires, boy wizards, or dead old men of
the Illuminati? It's ugly out there.
This is, of course, why the self-publishing biz is exploding,
maturing just as fast as traditional publishing is imploding. In many
ways, it's a savior. Of course, there's a huge catch. Like blogging,
once everyone can do it, quality nosedives and we are aswim in white
noise and garbage, in earnest people who have no idea what they're doing
and can't actually write a bearable sentence. Expert editors are a good thing.
But the biggest surprise, at least for me, came when all the
groups presented their rethinkings of the book business. Among all the
many ingenious plans, not one idea actually touched the physical product
itself. That is to say, despite all gizmos, websites, multimedia
extensions, the printed book is still impossible to breach. It's
impervious.
There's a reason for this, and it struck me to the quick as I
presented my humble wares. It's because the book -- the printed one,
wood pulp and ink, glue and sweat and blood -- remains a nearly perfect
product.
Think about it. It hasn't been fundamentally improved upon for 1,000 years.
Few other products in the world match it for reach and purity of
function. It's cheap, transportable, sharable. It's immersive,
transformative, offers universal and timeless appeal across all
nationalities, religions, races, creeds, politics, classes, education
levels. No other product you can name matches the book across the
efficiency/cost/intimacy/experience matrix. It's flawless.
So of course, we have to kill it.
Or rather, progress does. Everyone says the book is dying,
shifting, being stung to death by swarms of ravenous killer technology. A
rather twee piece
in the NYT Magazine recently took Amazon's bogus Kindle numbers and
spun them into a tale about how some are now using hardbound books not
as intellectual/spiritual stimulation, not as storytelling tools, not,
as Kafka said, "as an ax for the frozen sea inside us," but as the raw
materials to build ugly furniture. How quaint.
It's a dazzling realization, really. We simply don't have many
perfect products in the world. Paperclips. Pencils. Hitachi Magic Wands.
Hip flasks. Strippers. Christy Turlington. Swiss Army knives. Bali.
Many come close, some are perfect for single utility. But books are
unique in how, for just a few bucks and a handful of hours, you can have
your entire worldview flipped over, gutted, slapped asunder. Or not.
They are, in any case, a kind of magic.
You might say my grand takeaway of this Vegas experiment, then,
was a slap of tragedy, mixed with a big, throbbing imponderable. I
realized that, like sex, like single-malt Scotch, like the feel of a
woman's lower back in the morning, you cannot reinvent a perfect
product. You cannot improve upon something that refuses to be improved
upon. This does not seem to matter. We're trying anyway.
It comes down to a sort of weird footrace. Everyone seems to
sense, deep down, that the printed book is perfect, eternally
enchanting, deeply necessary for a healthy and functioning society. The
big question is not if we can reinvent it, but rather, if our appetites
have become too frenzied and distracted to save it.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 San Franciso Chronicle
Mark Morford
Mark Morford is a former columnist and culture critic for SFGATE. His website is markmorford.com.
Recently over in the sweltering, surreal wasteland that is Las Vegas
did I participate in a curious and fascinating event, one that did not
at all involve strippers, donkeys or hallucinogenic unicorns on the
moon. Well, mostly.
The gathering was mounted by a big San Francisco ad agency and
one of its clever leaders, a sort of boot camp/team building thing they
put on a few times a year so new employees can test their mettle, strain
their brainstems and come up with radically new ideas for a particular,
usually imaginary product, as they stay up all night, drink too much
Red Bull and discover their thresholds for being crammed together into
smallish hotel rooms for four days straight without showering.
I was there to present myself, my new book "The Daring Spectacle,"
my recent adventure in self-publishing. I was there, along with a
lovely young marketing whiz named Amy from Simon & Shuster in New
York, to talk up the state of the printed book in the age of
iPad/Kindle/eBook, to mourn the collapse of the traditional publishing
business, to give my independent-author side of what is increasingly
being called the tragic collapse of the publishing world overall.
I was there, in other words, because not only did I recently shun
traditional publishing and put out a printed book on my own, but I also
started my own little publishing corporation (called Rapture Machine)
to do it. And my story was perhaps helpful, because for this particular
event, these ad teams were tasked with one of most challenging questions
facing modern media today, one that's near and dear to my heart, my
medium and my livelihood: How to save/reinvent book publishing. And they
had about 72 hours to do it.
I won't go into all the ideas and reimaginings they came up with
-- there isn't space enough here, nor time. But I do want to focus on
two surprises and one dramatic realization that popped out, and none of
them has to do with how I lost, won, lost and then walked away about
$100 ahead at blackjack over three days. Awesome.
I was first sort of amazed to learn just how few of these
otherwise smart and well-informed folk had much of an idea how the book
business works, from imprints to distribution, contracts to cover art.
No one really knew how books get made, who makes which decisions, how
little control authors have, what we're expected to do nowadays, and so
on.
So immersed am I in the wicked funhouse of medialand, it struck
me that few in the general populace know -- or care -- how it all works.
Not that they should, but still.
No big deal, that. But it ties straight into the second surprise,
which was far more troubling, albeit still understandable. For few also
seemed to have much sense of just how bad it's become for books and
authors, how much corporate consolidation has occurred, how increasingly
extinct is the "undiscovered author" or killer book deal, how few
writers can make a living at their craft anymore.
This has been brutally true in newspapers and journalism for
nearly a decade now (hell, due to even more corporate budget slashings,
this very column, after 10 years, has just been cut down from twice to
once a week, starting, well, right now. Stick with me here).
But it might be even worse for books. Because everyone sort of takes books for granted; they've always been here, haven't they? And they've always been awesome? And easily available? Hell, everyone loves books. Everyone owns books, has a cherished memory or 10 about them. How bad can it be?
It's bad. Amazon might skew its numbers and claim that Kindle
editions are outselling traditional hardbacks (not exactly true), but
nevertheless, the printed book itself is in dire shape. Fewer new
voices, fewer risks, far less money flowing through the industry
overall. When's the last time you were in a bookstore? How many new
authors can you name in the past few years whose books aren't lame
knockoffs of cheeseball teen vampires, boy wizards, or dead old men of
the Illuminati? It's ugly out there.
This is, of course, why the self-publishing biz is exploding,
maturing just as fast as traditional publishing is imploding. In many
ways, it's a savior. Of course, there's a huge catch. Like blogging,
once everyone can do it, quality nosedives and we are aswim in white
noise and garbage, in earnest people who have no idea what they're doing
and can't actually write a bearable sentence. Expert editors are a good thing.
But the biggest surprise, at least for me, came when all the
groups presented their rethinkings of the book business. Among all the
many ingenious plans, not one idea actually touched the physical product
itself. That is to say, despite all gizmos, websites, multimedia
extensions, the printed book is still impossible to breach. It's
impervious.
There's a reason for this, and it struck me to the quick as I
presented my humble wares. It's because the book -- the printed one,
wood pulp and ink, glue and sweat and blood -- remains a nearly perfect
product.
Think about it. It hasn't been fundamentally improved upon for 1,000 years.
Few other products in the world match it for reach and purity of
function. It's cheap, transportable, sharable. It's immersive,
transformative, offers universal and timeless appeal across all
nationalities, religions, races, creeds, politics, classes, education
levels. No other product you can name matches the book across the
efficiency/cost/intimacy/experience matrix. It's flawless.
So of course, we have to kill it.
Or rather, progress does. Everyone says the book is dying,
shifting, being stung to death by swarms of ravenous killer technology. A
rather twee piece
in the NYT Magazine recently took Amazon's bogus Kindle numbers and
spun them into a tale about how some are now using hardbound books not
as intellectual/spiritual stimulation, not as storytelling tools, not,
as Kafka said, "as an ax for the frozen sea inside us," but as the raw
materials to build ugly furniture. How quaint.
It's a dazzling realization, really. We simply don't have many
perfect products in the world. Paperclips. Pencils. Hitachi Magic Wands.
Hip flasks. Strippers. Christy Turlington. Swiss Army knives. Bali.
Many come close, some are perfect for single utility. But books are
unique in how, for just a few bucks and a handful of hours, you can have
your entire worldview flipped over, gutted, slapped asunder. Or not.
They are, in any case, a kind of magic.
You might say my grand takeaway of this Vegas experiment, then,
was a slap of tragedy, mixed with a big, throbbing imponderable. I
realized that, like sex, like single-malt Scotch, like the feel of a
woman's lower back in the morning, you cannot reinvent a perfect
product. You cannot improve upon something that refuses to be improved
upon. This does not seem to matter. We're trying anyway.
It comes down to a sort of weird footrace. Everyone seems to
sense, deep down, that the printed book is perfect, eternally
enchanting, deeply necessary for a healthy and functioning society. The
big question is not if we can reinvent it, but rather, if our appetites
have become too frenzied and distracted to save it.
Mark Morford
Mark Morford is a former columnist and culture critic for SFGATE. His website is markmorford.com.
Recently over in the sweltering, surreal wasteland that is Las Vegas
did I participate in a curious and fascinating event, one that did not
at all involve strippers, donkeys or hallucinogenic unicorns on the
moon. Well, mostly.
The gathering was mounted by a big San Francisco ad agency and
one of its clever leaders, a sort of boot camp/team building thing they
put on a few times a year so new employees can test their mettle, strain
their brainstems and come up with radically new ideas for a particular,
usually imaginary product, as they stay up all night, drink too much
Red Bull and discover their thresholds for being crammed together into
smallish hotel rooms for four days straight without showering.
I was there to present myself, my new book "The Daring Spectacle,"
my recent adventure in self-publishing. I was there, along with a
lovely young marketing whiz named Amy from Simon & Shuster in New
York, to talk up the state of the printed book in the age of
iPad/Kindle/eBook, to mourn the collapse of the traditional publishing
business, to give my independent-author side of what is increasingly
being called the tragic collapse of the publishing world overall.
I was there, in other words, because not only did I recently shun
traditional publishing and put out a printed book on my own, but I also
started my own little publishing corporation (called Rapture Machine)
to do it. And my story was perhaps helpful, because for this particular
event, these ad teams were tasked with one of most challenging questions
facing modern media today, one that's near and dear to my heart, my
medium and my livelihood: How to save/reinvent book publishing. And they
had about 72 hours to do it.
I won't go into all the ideas and reimaginings they came up with
-- there isn't space enough here, nor time. But I do want to focus on
two surprises and one dramatic realization that popped out, and none of
them has to do with how I lost, won, lost and then walked away about
$100 ahead at blackjack over three days. Awesome.
I was first sort of amazed to learn just how few of these
otherwise smart and well-informed folk had much of an idea how the book
business works, from imprints to distribution, contracts to cover art.
No one really knew how books get made, who makes which decisions, how
little control authors have, what we're expected to do nowadays, and so
on.
So immersed am I in the wicked funhouse of medialand, it struck
me that few in the general populace know -- or care -- how it all works.
Not that they should, but still.
No big deal, that. But it ties straight into the second surprise,
which was far more troubling, albeit still understandable. For few also
seemed to have much sense of just how bad it's become for books and
authors, how much corporate consolidation has occurred, how increasingly
extinct is the "undiscovered author" or killer book deal, how few
writers can make a living at their craft anymore.
This has been brutally true in newspapers and journalism for
nearly a decade now (hell, due to even more corporate budget slashings,
this very column, after 10 years, has just been cut down from twice to
once a week, starting, well, right now. Stick with me here).
But it might be even worse for books. Because everyone sort of takes books for granted; they've always been here, haven't they? And they've always been awesome? And easily available? Hell, everyone loves books. Everyone owns books, has a cherished memory or 10 about them. How bad can it be?
It's bad. Amazon might skew its numbers and claim that Kindle
editions are outselling traditional hardbacks (not exactly true), but
nevertheless, the printed book itself is in dire shape. Fewer new
voices, fewer risks, far less money flowing through the industry
overall. When's the last time you were in a bookstore? How many new
authors can you name in the past few years whose books aren't lame
knockoffs of cheeseball teen vampires, boy wizards, or dead old men of
the Illuminati? It's ugly out there.
This is, of course, why the self-publishing biz is exploding,
maturing just as fast as traditional publishing is imploding. In many
ways, it's a savior. Of course, there's a huge catch. Like blogging,
once everyone can do it, quality nosedives and we are aswim in white
noise and garbage, in earnest people who have no idea what they're doing
and can't actually write a bearable sentence. Expert editors are a good thing.
But the biggest surprise, at least for me, came when all the
groups presented their rethinkings of the book business. Among all the
many ingenious plans, not one idea actually touched the physical product
itself. That is to say, despite all gizmos, websites, multimedia
extensions, the printed book is still impossible to breach. It's
impervious.
There's a reason for this, and it struck me to the quick as I
presented my humble wares. It's because the book -- the printed one,
wood pulp and ink, glue and sweat and blood -- remains a nearly perfect
product.
Think about it. It hasn't been fundamentally improved upon for 1,000 years.
Few other products in the world match it for reach and purity of
function. It's cheap, transportable, sharable. It's immersive,
transformative, offers universal and timeless appeal across all
nationalities, religions, races, creeds, politics, classes, education
levels. No other product you can name matches the book across the
efficiency/cost/intimacy/experience matrix. It's flawless.
So of course, we have to kill it.
Or rather, progress does. Everyone says the book is dying,
shifting, being stung to death by swarms of ravenous killer technology. A
rather twee piece
in the NYT Magazine recently took Amazon's bogus Kindle numbers and
spun them into a tale about how some are now using hardbound books not
as intellectual/spiritual stimulation, not as storytelling tools, not,
as Kafka said, "as an ax for the frozen sea inside us," but as the raw
materials to build ugly furniture. How quaint.
It's a dazzling realization, really. We simply don't have many
perfect products in the world. Paperclips. Pencils. Hitachi Magic Wands.
Hip flasks. Strippers. Christy Turlington. Swiss Army knives. Bali.
Many come close, some are perfect for single utility. But books are
unique in how, for just a few bucks and a handful of hours, you can have
your entire worldview flipped over, gutted, slapped asunder. Or not.
They are, in any case, a kind of magic.
You might say my grand takeaway of this Vegas experiment, then,
was a slap of tragedy, mixed with a big, throbbing imponderable. I
realized that, like sex, like single-malt Scotch, like the feel of a
woman's lower back in the morning, you cannot reinvent a perfect
product. You cannot improve upon something that refuses to be improved
upon. This does not seem to matter. We're trying anyway.
It comes down to a sort of weird footrace. Everyone seems to
sense, deep down, that the printed book is perfect, eternally
enchanting, deeply necessary for a healthy and functioning society. The
big question is not if we can reinvent it, but rather, if our appetites
have become too frenzied and distracted to save it.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.