The Great Decoupling of Corporate Profits from Jobs
Second-quarter earnings reports are coming
in, and they're making Wall Street smile. Corporate profits are up. And
big American companies are sitting on a gigantic pile of money. The 500
largest non-financial firms held almost a trillion dollars in the second
quarter, and that money pile is growing larger this quarter. Profits
that plummeted in the recession have bounced back. Big businesses have
recovered almost 90 percent of what they lost.
So with all this money and profit, they'll start hiring again,
right? Wrong - for three reasons.
Second-quarter earnings reports are coming
in, and they're making Wall Street smile. Corporate profits are up. And
big American companies are sitting on a gigantic pile of money. The 500
largest non-financial firms held almost a trillion dollars in the second
quarter, and that money pile is growing larger this quarter. Profits
that plummeted in the recession have bounced back. Big businesses have
recovered almost 90 percent of what they lost.
So with all this money and profit, they'll start hiring again,
right? Wrong - for three reasons.
First, lots of their profits are coming from
their overseas operations. So that's where they're investing and
expanding production.
GM now sells more cars in China than it does
in the US, but makes most of them there. The company now employs 32,000
hourly workers in China. But only 52,000 GM hourly workers remain in the
United States - down from 468,000 in 1970.
GM isn't just hiring low-tech assembly
workers in China. Last week the firm broke ground there on a $250
million advanced technology center to develop batteries and other
alternative energy sources.
You and I and other American taxpayers still
own over 60 percent of GM. We bought GM to save GM jobs, remember?
GM officials say no American taxpayer money
is being used to expand in China. But money is fungible.
Because of our generosity, GM can now use the dollars it doesn't have to
spend in the United States meeting its American payrolls and repaying
its creditors, for new investments in China.
Second, big U.S. businesses are investing
their cash in labor-saving technologies. This boosts their productivity,
but not their payrolls.
Last Friday, for example, Ford reported a
$2.6 billion second-quarter profit. The firm is already more than
two-thirds the way to equaling its record 1999 profits. But due to
labor-saving technologies, Ford now has half as many employees as it did
a decade ago.
Wall Street analysts are happy with Ford's
"commitment to keeping capacity in check," according to the Wall
Street Journal. Ford shares rose 5.2 percent Friday. "Keeping
capacity in check" is the Street's way of saying "no new hiring." In
fact, the Street is advising investors to sell the stocks of companies
that talk openly of expanding capacity.
Finally, corporations are using their pile of
money to pay dividends to their shareholders and buy back their own
stock - thereby pushing up share prices.
Last Friday, GE announced it would raise its
dividend by 20 percent and reinstate its share-buyback plan. It's GE's
first dividend increase since the company cut its dividend in early
2009. As a result, GE shares are up more than 5% in the past few days.
Bottom line: Higher corporate profits no
longer lead to higher employment. We're witnessing a great decoupling
of company profits from jobs.
The next supply-side economist who tells you
companies need more incentive (i.e. lower taxes) before they'll hire is
living on another planet.
The reality is this: Big American companies
may never rehire large numbers of workers. And they won't even begin to
think about hiring until they know American consumers will buy their
products. The problem is, American consumers won't start buying against
until they know they have reliable paychecks.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Second-quarter earnings reports are coming
in, and they're making Wall Street smile. Corporate profits are up. And
big American companies are sitting on a gigantic pile of money. The 500
largest non-financial firms held almost a trillion dollars in the second
quarter, and that money pile is growing larger this quarter. Profits
that plummeted in the recession have bounced back. Big businesses have
recovered almost 90 percent of what they lost.
So with all this money and profit, they'll start hiring again,
right? Wrong - for three reasons.
First, lots of their profits are coming from
their overseas operations. So that's where they're investing and
expanding production.
GM now sells more cars in China than it does
in the US, but makes most of them there. The company now employs 32,000
hourly workers in China. But only 52,000 GM hourly workers remain in the
United States - down from 468,000 in 1970.
GM isn't just hiring low-tech assembly
workers in China. Last week the firm broke ground there on a $250
million advanced technology center to develop batteries and other
alternative energy sources.
You and I and other American taxpayers still
own over 60 percent of GM. We bought GM to save GM jobs, remember?
GM officials say no American taxpayer money
is being used to expand in China. But money is fungible.
Because of our generosity, GM can now use the dollars it doesn't have to
spend in the United States meeting its American payrolls and repaying
its creditors, for new investments in China.
Second, big U.S. businesses are investing
their cash in labor-saving technologies. This boosts their productivity,
but not their payrolls.
Last Friday, for example, Ford reported a
$2.6 billion second-quarter profit. The firm is already more than
two-thirds the way to equaling its record 1999 profits. But due to
labor-saving technologies, Ford now has half as many employees as it did
a decade ago.
Wall Street analysts are happy with Ford's
"commitment to keeping capacity in check," according to the Wall
Street Journal. Ford shares rose 5.2 percent Friday. "Keeping
capacity in check" is the Street's way of saying "no new hiring." In
fact, the Street is advising investors to sell the stocks of companies
that talk openly of expanding capacity.
Finally, corporations are using their pile of
money to pay dividends to their shareholders and buy back their own
stock - thereby pushing up share prices.
Last Friday, GE announced it would raise its
dividend by 20 percent and reinstate its share-buyback plan. It's GE's
first dividend increase since the company cut its dividend in early
2009. As a result, GE shares are up more than 5% in the past few days.
Bottom line: Higher corporate profits no
longer lead to higher employment. We're witnessing a great decoupling
of company profits from jobs.
The next supply-side economist who tells you
companies need more incentive (i.e. lower taxes) before they'll hire is
living on another planet.
The reality is this: Big American companies
may never rehire large numbers of workers. And they won't even begin to
think about hiring until they know American consumers will buy their
products. The problem is, American consumers won't start buying against
until they know they have reliable paychecks.
Second-quarter earnings reports are coming
in, and they're making Wall Street smile. Corporate profits are up. And
big American companies are sitting on a gigantic pile of money. The 500
largest non-financial firms held almost a trillion dollars in the second
quarter, and that money pile is growing larger this quarter. Profits
that plummeted in the recession have bounced back. Big businesses have
recovered almost 90 percent of what they lost.
So with all this money and profit, they'll start hiring again,
right? Wrong - for three reasons.
First, lots of their profits are coming from
their overseas operations. So that's where they're investing and
expanding production.
GM now sells more cars in China than it does
in the US, but makes most of them there. The company now employs 32,000
hourly workers in China. But only 52,000 GM hourly workers remain in the
United States - down from 468,000 in 1970.
GM isn't just hiring low-tech assembly
workers in China. Last week the firm broke ground there on a $250
million advanced technology center to develop batteries and other
alternative energy sources.
You and I and other American taxpayers still
own over 60 percent of GM. We bought GM to save GM jobs, remember?
GM officials say no American taxpayer money
is being used to expand in China. But money is fungible.
Because of our generosity, GM can now use the dollars it doesn't have to
spend in the United States meeting its American payrolls and repaying
its creditors, for new investments in China.
Second, big U.S. businesses are investing
their cash in labor-saving technologies. This boosts their productivity,
but not their payrolls.
Last Friday, for example, Ford reported a
$2.6 billion second-quarter profit. The firm is already more than
two-thirds the way to equaling its record 1999 profits. But due to
labor-saving technologies, Ford now has half as many employees as it did
a decade ago.
Wall Street analysts are happy with Ford's
"commitment to keeping capacity in check," according to the Wall
Street Journal. Ford shares rose 5.2 percent Friday. "Keeping
capacity in check" is the Street's way of saying "no new hiring." In
fact, the Street is advising investors to sell the stocks of companies
that talk openly of expanding capacity.
Finally, corporations are using their pile of
money to pay dividends to their shareholders and buy back their own
stock - thereby pushing up share prices.
Last Friday, GE announced it would raise its
dividend by 20 percent and reinstate its share-buyback plan. It's GE's
first dividend increase since the company cut its dividend in early
2009. As a result, GE shares are up more than 5% in the past few days.
Bottom line: Higher corporate profits no
longer lead to higher employment. We're witnessing a great decoupling
of company profits from jobs.
The next supply-side economist who tells you
companies need more incentive (i.e. lower taxes) before they'll hire is
living on another planet.
The reality is this: Big American companies
may never rehire large numbers of workers. And they won't even begin to
think about hiring until they know American consumers will buy their
products. The problem is, American consumers won't start buying against
until they know they have reliable paychecks.