Teachers Need to Confront, Denounce Obama's 'Race to the Top'
It's best to quickly recognize the red flags in any
failing
relationship. This way, ties can be severed instead of allowing things
to
linger forever in dysfunction. For Democrats and teachers' unions, the
writing is on the wall. The two are simply going in opposite
directions.
It's best to quickly recognize the red flags in any
failing
relationship. This way, ties can be severed instead of allowing things
to
linger forever in dysfunction. For Democrats and teachers' unions, the
writing is on the wall. The two are simply going in opposite
directions.
The Democrats continue on the road to corporate-inspired
charter schools, using the tried and true method of "stronger teacher
evaluations" to undermine "underperforming" schools and teachers - thus
opening
the door wide to private charter schools with their non-union
workforce.
Obama's Race to the Top education "reform" has enshrined
these odious goals into government policy, and the once love-struck
teachers'
unions have hastily exited the honeymoon stage with the Obama
administration,
heading toward a quick divorce.
Rank and file teachers have already quit the Obama
administration, and by extension the Democrats as a whole. Evidence of
this was on display during the national conventions of the two largest
teacher
unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American
Federation of
Teachers (AFT).
The NEA convention voted in favor of a resolution of "no
confidence" in Obama's Race to the Top program, essentially voting "no
confidence" in the Obama administration. The AFT convention was not
allowed to
vote on a similar resolution, but the rank and file applauded loudest
when the
AFT President, Randi Weingarten, spoke about the betrayal of the Obama
administration. The NEA did not invite Obama administration officials to
the convention, because, according to The New York Times, "...union
officials
feared that [Obama] administration speakers would face heckling." (July 4, 2010).
The president of the NEA, Dennis Van Roekel, summarized
teacher's experience with the Obama administration:
"Today our members face the most anti-educator,
anti-union,
anti-student environment I have ever experienced." This is an
extraordinary statement. Not only is it true, but it highlights that
President Obama is more anti-teacher than was President Bush, who
introduced
the anti-teacher No Child Left Behind.
In fact, the situation for teachers is worse than either
union president is willing to say. State budget crises are destroying
the
funding for public education and teachers are being laid-off by the
thousands,
while others accept wage freezes, larger classes, and other
concessions.
On top of this, a flood of new state laws around the
country
is being implemented by Democrats and Republicans "working together" in
accordance with Obama's Race to the Top campaign. The New York Times
explains:
"...with states across the nation facing huge budget
shortfalls,
governors, legislators, mayors and educators in about three dozen states
have
been working to win Race to the Top money by bringing their school
policies in
line with President Obama's education agenda." (May 31, 2010).
The barrage of new state laws makes it easier for states
to
create private charter schools - at the expense of public education -
and to
fire union teachers (based on their students' test scores). Job security
and public education are both under massive attack.
On July 23rd,
241 teachers were fired in Washington D.C., based on
their
student's test scores. Examples like this are now becoming common. If
unions cannot prevent these mass firings from happening, their power
becomes
decimated.
But this frontal assault is not being labeled as such by
many teacher union officials. Some union leaders are minimizing the
destruction caused by the Obama administration, simply referring to his
policies as "misguided" or "flawed," rather than condemning the
Democrats as
"blatantly anti-union" or "destructive to public education."
This is because many union leaders are deathly afraid of
ending their co-dependent relationship with the Democrats, no matter
what level
of domestic violence occurs. These union officials make excuses for the
Democrats, or justify their cooperation with the politicians, by
claiming that
the union needs "a seat at the table." But at this table teachers are on
the menu, and the Democrats are only willing to listen to union advice
as to
how the teachers are best served - grilled, roasted, skewered.
A big test will come this November, when mid-term
elections
will take place all over the country. Will teachers' unions use funds
and
resources to help elect Democrats, after tens of millions were wasted to
elect
Obama and his Race to the Top cohorts in Congress?
Some union leaders will argue, "Yes, we will support good
Democrats." Fair enough, but a good Democrat is not someone that simply
says, "I support unions and teachers." A necessary condition for
teachers'
unions to support politicians must be that they condemn Obama's Race to
the
Top, while declaring allegiance to the job security of teachers, and
thus they
must refuse to cooperate with the corporate-inspired scheme to make
teachers'
evaluations based on students test scores, so as to create more charter
schools.
Also, politicians who are given union support must have a
plan to fully fund public education and reject the current trend of
cutting
funds to education and social services, using budget deficits as an
excuse.
Raising taxes on the rich and corporations - as Oregon did - is
one
way for teachers to survive the state budget crises.
Ultimately, teachers' unions need to officially declare
their defunct relationship with the Democrats is "over" and work with
politically independent labor candidates, with a future eye towards
creating a
union-led political party that would represent the interests of all
working
people.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's best to quickly recognize the red flags in any
failing
relationship. This way, ties can be severed instead of allowing things
to
linger forever in dysfunction. For Democrats and teachers' unions, the
writing is on the wall. The two are simply going in opposite
directions.
The Democrats continue on the road to corporate-inspired
charter schools, using the tried and true method of "stronger teacher
evaluations" to undermine "underperforming" schools and teachers - thus
opening
the door wide to private charter schools with their non-union
workforce.
Obama's Race to the Top education "reform" has enshrined
these odious goals into government policy, and the once love-struck
teachers'
unions have hastily exited the honeymoon stage with the Obama
administration,
heading toward a quick divorce.
Rank and file teachers have already quit the Obama
administration, and by extension the Democrats as a whole. Evidence of
this was on display during the national conventions of the two largest
teacher
unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American
Federation of
Teachers (AFT).
The NEA convention voted in favor of a resolution of "no
confidence" in Obama's Race to the Top program, essentially voting "no
confidence" in the Obama administration. The AFT convention was not
allowed to
vote on a similar resolution, but the rank and file applauded loudest
when the
AFT President, Randi Weingarten, spoke about the betrayal of the Obama
administration. The NEA did not invite Obama administration officials to
the convention, because, according to The New York Times, "...union
officials
feared that [Obama] administration speakers would face heckling." (July 4, 2010).
The president of the NEA, Dennis Van Roekel, summarized
teacher's experience with the Obama administration:
"Today our members face the most anti-educator,
anti-union,
anti-student environment I have ever experienced." This is an
extraordinary statement. Not only is it true, but it highlights that
President Obama is more anti-teacher than was President Bush, who
introduced
the anti-teacher No Child Left Behind.
In fact, the situation for teachers is worse than either
union president is willing to say. State budget crises are destroying
the
funding for public education and teachers are being laid-off by the
thousands,
while others accept wage freezes, larger classes, and other
concessions.
On top of this, a flood of new state laws around the
country
is being implemented by Democrats and Republicans "working together" in
accordance with Obama's Race to the Top campaign. The New York Times
explains:
"...with states across the nation facing huge budget
shortfalls,
governors, legislators, mayors and educators in about three dozen states
have
been working to win Race to the Top money by bringing their school
policies in
line with President Obama's education agenda." (May 31, 2010).
The barrage of new state laws makes it easier for states
to
create private charter schools - at the expense of public education -
and to
fire union teachers (based on their students' test scores). Job security
and public education are both under massive attack.
On July 23rd,
241 teachers were fired in Washington D.C., based on
their
student's test scores. Examples like this are now becoming common. If
unions cannot prevent these mass firings from happening, their power
becomes
decimated.
But this frontal assault is not being labeled as such by
many teacher union officials. Some union leaders are minimizing the
destruction caused by the Obama administration, simply referring to his
policies as "misguided" or "flawed," rather than condemning the
Democrats as
"blatantly anti-union" or "destructive to public education."
This is because many union leaders are deathly afraid of
ending their co-dependent relationship with the Democrats, no matter
what level
of domestic violence occurs. These union officials make excuses for the
Democrats, or justify their cooperation with the politicians, by
claiming that
the union needs "a seat at the table." But at this table teachers are on
the menu, and the Democrats are only willing to listen to union advice
as to
how the teachers are best served - grilled, roasted, skewered.
A big test will come this November, when mid-term
elections
will take place all over the country. Will teachers' unions use funds
and
resources to help elect Democrats, after tens of millions were wasted to
elect
Obama and his Race to the Top cohorts in Congress?
Some union leaders will argue, "Yes, we will support good
Democrats." Fair enough, but a good Democrat is not someone that simply
says, "I support unions and teachers." A necessary condition for
teachers'
unions to support politicians must be that they condemn Obama's Race to
the
Top, while declaring allegiance to the job security of teachers, and
thus they
must refuse to cooperate with the corporate-inspired scheme to make
teachers'
evaluations based on students test scores, so as to create more charter
schools.
Also, politicians who are given union support must have a
plan to fully fund public education and reject the current trend of
cutting
funds to education and social services, using budget deficits as an
excuse.
Raising taxes on the rich and corporations - as Oregon did - is
one
way for teachers to survive the state budget crises.
Ultimately, teachers' unions need to officially declare
their defunct relationship with the Democrats is "over" and work with
politically independent labor candidates, with a future eye towards
creating a
union-led political party that would represent the interests of all
working
people.
It's best to quickly recognize the red flags in any
failing
relationship. This way, ties can be severed instead of allowing things
to
linger forever in dysfunction. For Democrats and teachers' unions, the
writing is on the wall. The two are simply going in opposite
directions.
The Democrats continue on the road to corporate-inspired
charter schools, using the tried and true method of "stronger teacher
evaluations" to undermine "underperforming" schools and teachers - thus
opening
the door wide to private charter schools with their non-union
workforce.
Obama's Race to the Top education "reform" has enshrined
these odious goals into government policy, and the once love-struck
teachers'
unions have hastily exited the honeymoon stage with the Obama
administration,
heading toward a quick divorce.
Rank and file teachers have already quit the Obama
administration, and by extension the Democrats as a whole. Evidence of
this was on display during the national conventions of the two largest
teacher
unions, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American
Federation of
Teachers (AFT).
The NEA convention voted in favor of a resolution of "no
confidence" in Obama's Race to the Top program, essentially voting "no
confidence" in the Obama administration. The AFT convention was not
allowed to
vote on a similar resolution, but the rank and file applauded loudest
when the
AFT President, Randi Weingarten, spoke about the betrayal of the Obama
administration. The NEA did not invite Obama administration officials to
the convention, because, according to The New York Times, "...union
officials
feared that [Obama] administration speakers would face heckling." (July 4, 2010).
The president of the NEA, Dennis Van Roekel, summarized
teacher's experience with the Obama administration:
"Today our members face the most anti-educator,
anti-union,
anti-student environment I have ever experienced." This is an
extraordinary statement. Not only is it true, but it highlights that
President Obama is more anti-teacher than was President Bush, who
introduced
the anti-teacher No Child Left Behind.
In fact, the situation for teachers is worse than either
union president is willing to say. State budget crises are destroying
the
funding for public education and teachers are being laid-off by the
thousands,
while others accept wage freezes, larger classes, and other
concessions.
On top of this, a flood of new state laws around the
country
is being implemented by Democrats and Republicans "working together" in
accordance with Obama's Race to the Top campaign. The New York Times
explains:
"...with states across the nation facing huge budget
shortfalls,
governors, legislators, mayors and educators in about three dozen states
have
been working to win Race to the Top money by bringing their school
policies in
line with President Obama's education agenda." (May 31, 2010).
The barrage of new state laws makes it easier for states
to
create private charter schools - at the expense of public education -
and to
fire union teachers (based on their students' test scores). Job security
and public education are both under massive attack.
On July 23rd,
241 teachers were fired in Washington D.C., based on
their
student's test scores. Examples like this are now becoming common. If
unions cannot prevent these mass firings from happening, their power
becomes
decimated.
But this frontal assault is not being labeled as such by
many teacher union officials. Some union leaders are minimizing the
destruction caused by the Obama administration, simply referring to his
policies as "misguided" or "flawed," rather than condemning the
Democrats as
"blatantly anti-union" or "destructive to public education."
This is because many union leaders are deathly afraid of
ending their co-dependent relationship with the Democrats, no matter
what level
of domestic violence occurs. These union officials make excuses for the
Democrats, or justify their cooperation with the politicians, by
claiming that
the union needs "a seat at the table." But at this table teachers are on
the menu, and the Democrats are only willing to listen to union advice
as to
how the teachers are best served - grilled, roasted, skewered.
A big test will come this November, when mid-term
elections
will take place all over the country. Will teachers' unions use funds
and
resources to help elect Democrats, after tens of millions were wasted to
elect
Obama and his Race to the Top cohorts in Congress?
Some union leaders will argue, "Yes, we will support good
Democrats." Fair enough, but a good Democrat is not someone that simply
says, "I support unions and teachers." A necessary condition for
teachers'
unions to support politicians must be that they condemn Obama's Race to
the
Top, while declaring allegiance to the job security of teachers, and
thus they
must refuse to cooperate with the corporate-inspired scheme to make
teachers'
evaluations based on students test scores, so as to create more charter
schools.
Also, politicians who are given union support must have a
plan to fully fund public education and reject the current trend of
cutting
funds to education and social services, using budget deficits as an
excuse.
Raising taxes on the rich and corporations - as Oregon did - is
one
way for teachers to survive the state budget crises.
Ultimately, teachers' unions need to officially declare
their defunct relationship with the Democrats is "over" and work with
politically independent labor candidates, with a future eye towards
creating a
union-led political party that would represent the interests of all
working
people.