

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The increasingly incoherent national debate on immigration tends to
polarize between "legal" and "illegal." Those two terms, in addition to
being inherently arbitrary, mask the gradients of exploitation among
immigrants who are living and working legally in various sectors. A
study of women who came to the crab industry of Maryland's Eastern
Shore on H2-B visas--the supposedly lucky ones who entered the country
with the right papers--shows that abuse and oppression can fit
comfortably within the confines of immigration law.
The report, published by Centro de los Derechos del
Migrante and the International Human Rights Law Clinic at American
University's Washington College of Law, examine the women's experiences
both in their homeland and the U.S. and reveal what "legal" immigrant
labor looks like today:
All of the women interviewed earned were paid a piece
rate - typically $2.00 or $2.25 per pound of crabmeat picked. In order
to earn the federal minimum wage of $7.25 over the course of a 40-hour
workweek, a crab picker earning $2.00 per pound must pick 145 lbs of
crabmeat per week, which requires handling over 200 crabs daily. Women
who are unable to work with sufficient speed to earn the minimum wage
are either sent home, or -- in the case of more accommodating employers
-- are switched to an hourly wage rate.....The majority of women interviewed - 54 percent - reported paycheck
deductions for knives, gloves, and other basic tools and safety
equipment. Many of the workers interviewed expressed confusion about
the purpose of different deductions. Few regularly received paystubs....The women interviewed universally reported experiencing cuts on their
hands and arms while picking crabs with sharp knives. In some
instances, the cuts allow a dangerous seaborne bacterium, vibrio
vulnificus, to infect the skin, causing blistering or lesions. A
surprising number of women reported either having suffered from or
witnessing a co-worker suffer from the disease, which has a 50 percent
mortality rate once it enters the bloodstream....Several women interviewed were frustrated that the men hired to wash
and clean the crabs earned more per hour and were given more hours than
the women picking crabmeat.
Still, this is preferable to their trying to eke out a living in
impoverished rural communities in Mexico. The cost of this opportunity
includes debts from heavy (and illegal) recruitment fees, as well as
the burden of being tied to one employer while they work in the U.S.
The findings, reflective of common practices in the two-tier guestworker system,
underscore the absurdity of the threshold that defines "legal" work,
and how easily employers can bend laws or ignore them altogether.
The report calls on state and federal authorities to reform labor
and workplace safety policies and to provide better social services to
migrants--the basic protections to which their work authorization
should entitle them.
Legalization and a path to citizenship are crucial components of
comprehensive immigration reform. But the government-sanctioned
exploitation in the crab industry shows why rights activists balk at the concept of guestworker programs. While
the "illegal" label dehumanizes immigrants, second-class legal status,
perhaps even more dangerously, may paper over injustice, as long as the
labor market takes inequality for granted.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The increasingly incoherent national debate on immigration tends to
polarize between "legal" and "illegal." Those two terms, in addition to
being inherently arbitrary, mask the gradients of exploitation among
immigrants who are living and working legally in various sectors. A
study of women who came to the crab industry of Maryland's Eastern
Shore on H2-B visas--the supposedly lucky ones who entered the country
with the right papers--shows that abuse and oppression can fit
comfortably within the confines of immigration law.
The report, published by Centro de los Derechos del
Migrante and the International Human Rights Law Clinic at American
University's Washington College of Law, examine the women's experiences
both in their homeland and the U.S. and reveal what "legal" immigrant
labor looks like today:
All of the women interviewed earned were paid a piece
rate - typically $2.00 or $2.25 per pound of crabmeat picked. In order
to earn the federal minimum wage of $7.25 over the course of a 40-hour
workweek, a crab picker earning $2.00 per pound must pick 145 lbs of
crabmeat per week, which requires handling over 200 crabs daily. Women
who are unable to work with sufficient speed to earn the minimum wage
are either sent home, or -- in the case of more accommodating employers
-- are switched to an hourly wage rate.....The majority of women interviewed - 54 percent - reported paycheck
deductions for knives, gloves, and other basic tools and safety
equipment. Many of the workers interviewed expressed confusion about
the purpose of different deductions. Few regularly received paystubs....The women interviewed universally reported experiencing cuts on their
hands and arms while picking crabs with sharp knives. In some
instances, the cuts allow a dangerous seaborne bacterium, vibrio
vulnificus, to infect the skin, causing blistering or lesions. A
surprising number of women reported either having suffered from or
witnessing a co-worker suffer from the disease, which has a 50 percent
mortality rate once it enters the bloodstream....Several women interviewed were frustrated that the men hired to wash
and clean the crabs earned more per hour and were given more hours than
the women picking crabmeat.
Still, this is preferable to their trying to eke out a living in
impoverished rural communities in Mexico. The cost of this opportunity
includes debts from heavy (and illegal) recruitment fees, as well as
the burden of being tied to one employer while they work in the U.S.
The findings, reflective of common practices in the two-tier guestworker system,
underscore the absurdity of the threshold that defines "legal" work,
and how easily employers can bend laws or ignore them altogether.
The report calls on state and federal authorities to reform labor
and workplace safety policies and to provide better social services to
migrants--the basic protections to which their work authorization
should entitle them.
Legalization and a path to citizenship are crucial components of
comprehensive immigration reform. But the government-sanctioned
exploitation in the crab industry shows why rights activists balk at the concept of guestworker programs. While
the "illegal" label dehumanizes immigrants, second-class legal status,
perhaps even more dangerously, may paper over injustice, as long as the
labor market takes inequality for granted.
The increasingly incoherent national debate on immigration tends to
polarize between "legal" and "illegal." Those two terms, in addition to
being inherently arbitrary, mask the gradients of exploitation among
immigrants who are living and working legally in various sectors. A
study of women who came to the crab industry of Maryland's Eastern
Shore on H2-B visas--the supposedly lucky ones who entered the country
with the right papers--shows that abuse and oppression can fit
comfortably within the confines of immigration law.
The report, published by Centro de los Derechos del
Migrante and the International Human Rights Law Clinic at American
University's Washington College of Law, examine the women's experiences
both in their homeland and the U.S. and reveal what "legal" immigrant
labor looks like today:
All of the women interviewed earned were paid a piece
rate - typically $2.00 or $2.25 per pound of crabmeat picked. In order
to earn the federal minimum wage of $7.25 over the course of a 40-hour
workweek, a crab picker earning $2.00 per pound must pick 145 lbs of
crabmeat per week, which requires handling over 200 crabs daily. Women
who are unable to work with sufficient speed to earn the minimum wage
are either sent home, or -- in the case of more accommodating employers
-- are switched to an hourly wage rate.....The majority of women interviewed - 54 percent - reported paycheck
deductions for knives, gloves, and other basic tools and safety
equipment. Many of the workers interviewed expressed confusion about
the purpose of different deductions. Few regularly received paystubs....The women interviewed universally reported experiencing cuts on their
hands and arms while picking crabs with sharp knives. In some
instances, the cuts allow a dangerous seaborne bacterium, vibrio
vulnificus, to infect the skin, causing blistering or lesions. A
surprising number of women reported either having suffered from or
witnessing a co-worker suffer from the disease, which has a 50 percent
mortality rate once it enters the bloodstream....Several women interviewed were frustrated that the men hired to wash
and clean the crabs earned more per hour and were given more hours than
the women picking crabmeat.
Still, this is preferable to their trying to eke out a living in
impoverished rural communities in Mexico. The cost of this opportunity
includes debts from heavy (and illegal) recruitment fees, as well as
the burden of being tied to one employer while they work in the U.S.
The findings, reflective of common practices in the two-tier guestworker system,
underscore the absurdity of the threshold that defines "legal" work,
and how easily employers can bend laws or ignore them altogether.
The report calls on state and federal authorities to reform labor
and workplace safety policies and to provide better social services to
migrants--the basic protections to which their work authorization
should entitle them.
Legalization and a path to citizenship are crucial components of
comprehensive immigration reform. But the government-sanctioned
exploitation in the crab industry shows why rights activists balk at the concept of guestworker programs. While
the "illegal" label dehumanizes immigrants, second-class legal status,
perhaps even more dangerously, may paper over injustice, as long as the
labor market takes inequality for granted.