Jun 17, 2010
ONE IMAGE captures the truth and enormity of the Gulf oil spill, even
more than the muck-soaked pelicans.
It's the live video feed of oil spewing into the ocean, which BP was forced to post on the Internet,
thanks to US Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts. Gaining
access to the video was a major battle. Now, the relentless scrutiny of
that undersea eye - actually 12 undersea eyes attached to a dozen
camera-bearing robots - keeps the pressure on the oil company.
It also keeps the pressure on President Obama as he tries to buff up a
tarnished commander-in-chief image. Whether Obama is meeting with BP
executives or walking along Gulf beaches, the camera never blinks on the
worst environmental disaster in US history.
It's a damning fountain of truth, brought to the public by Markey, a
fellow Democrat. Watching the brown crude gurgling in the corner of the
screen as Obama or BP executives address the crisis is akin to watching
the Dow drop when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner first unveiled the
administration's financial bail-out plan.
The BP-owned rig exploded on April 20 and sank on April 22. It took
several weeks days before BP released any film of the undersea leak, and
the company first showed only a few minutes of video. On May 19,
Markey, who chairs the House subcommittee on Energy and the Environment,
pressed scientists to assess the extent of the disaster. Their spill
estimates - up to 70,000 barrels a day - mirrored what one BP official
told Markey a week after the explosion, and were much higher than what
BP officials were telling the public. Afterwards, Markey demanded that
BP post the spill-cam or let Markey's office do it. Under increasing
public pressure, BP gave the video feed to Markey.
Shortly after it went live at 1:30 p.m. on May 20, the website - globalwarming.house.gov/spillcam
- crashed.
Markey went to battle once again, when he realized BP was providing
only one shot from one camera. Markey also challenged BP's plan to
completely shut down the video when it undertook the "top kill''
procedure, a strategy that ultimately failed to stop the gusher. When
news of the proposed black-out became public, BP backed down. Live feeds
from all 12 cameras have been available ever since.
The video feed is now available on other websites, including BP's.
But a computer in Markey's committee office in the basement of the
Longworth Building still runs all 12 camera feeds, 24/7, directly into
the pool feed for major network and cable programs.
"The spill-cam has allowed the public and independent scientists
access to the crime scene,'' said Markey. "This is a real time video of
BP's real world disaster.''
Markey said he still doesn't trust BP. During the next phase of the
effort to cap the spill, he wants BP to apply the fluorescent dye that
experts say is necessary to accurately measure the speed and quantity of
the oil that continues to spew.
The amount of oil is important, since BP is liable for every barrel
it spills. Markey believes the company deliberately tried to keep the
video from the public to limit its liability.
According to a lengthy article on the spill in Rolling Stone
magazine, the Obama administration also had access to the video "from
the earliest days of the disaster.''
Asked to respond, Markey ducked, saying, "The president said that if
there were one thing he would do over again, he would not have trusted
BP. In those first couple of weeks, I think that obviously BP was trying
to limit is liability rather than protect the livability of the Gulf.''
The video serves as a constant and powerful reminder of man's
encroachment on environment - "a crime against nature,'' as Markey puts
it.
It also measures rhetoric against reality.
In his Oval Office address, Obama said that efforts to stop the spill
should soon "capture up to 90 percent of the oil leading out of the
well.''
No one should believe projections like that until the image on the
video shifts to a trickle and finally, thankfully stops.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 Boston Globe
ONE IMAGE captures the truth and enormity of the Gulf oil spill, even
more than the muck-soaked pelicans.
It's the live video feed of oil spewing into the ocean, which BP was forced to post on the Internet,
thanks to US Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts. Gaining
access to the video was a major battle. Now, the relentless scrutiny of
that undersea eye - actually 12 undersea eyes attached to a dozen
camera-bearing robots - keeps the pressure on the oil company.
It also keeps the pressure on President Obama as he tries to buff up a
tarnished commander-in-chief image. Whether Obama is meeting with BP
executives or walking along Gulf beaches, the camera never blinks on the
worst environmental disaster in US history.
It's a damning fountain of truth, brought to the public by Markey, a
fellow Democrat. Watching the brown crude gurgling in the corner of the
screen as Obama or BP executives address the crisis is akin to watching
the Dow drop when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner first unveiled the
administration's financial bail-out plan.
The BP-owned rig exploded on April 20 and sank on April 22. It took
several weeks days before BP released any film of the undersea leak, and
the company first showed only a few minutes of video. On May 19,
Markey, who chairs the House subcommittee on Energy and the Environment,
pressed scientists to assess the extent of the disaster. Their spill
estimates - up to 70,000 barrels a day - mirrored what one BP official
told Markey a week after the explosion, and were much higher than what
BP officials were telling the public. Afterwards, Markey demanded that
BP post the spill-cam or let Markey's office do it. Under increasing
public pressure, BP gave the video feed to Markey.
Shortly after it went live at 1:30 p.m. on May 20, the website - globalwarming.house.gov/spillcam
- crashed.
Markey went to battle once again, when he realized BP was providing
only one shot from one camera. Markey also challenged BP's plan to
completely shut down the video when it undertook the "top kill''
procedure, a strategy that ultimately failed to stop the gusher. When
news of the proposed black-out became public, BP backed down. Live feeds
from all 12 cameras have been available ever since.
The video feed is now available on other websites, including BP's.
But a computer in Markey's committee office in the basement of the
Longworth Building still runs all 12 camera feeds, 24/7, directly into
the pool feed for major network and cable programs.
"The spill-cam has allowed the public and independent scientists
access to the crime scene,'' said Markey. "This is a real time video of
BP's real world disaster.''
Markey said he still doesn't trust BP. During the next phase of the
effort to cap the spill, he wants BP to apply the fluorescent dye that
experts say is necessary to accurately measure the speed and quantity of
the oil that continues to spew.
The amount of oil is important, since BP is liable for every barrel
it spills. Markey believes the company deliberately tried to keep the
video from the public to limit its liability.
According to a lengthy article on the spill in Rolling Stone
magazine, the Obama administration also had access to the video "from
the earliest days of the disaster.''
Asked to respond, Markey ducked, saying, "The president said that if
there were one thing he would do over again, he would not have trusted
BP. In those first couple of weeks, I think that obviously BP was trying
to limit is liability rather than protect the livability of the Gulf.''
The video serves as a constant and powerful reminder of man's
encroachment on environment - "a crime against nature,'' as Markey puts
it.
It also measures rhetoric against reality.
In his Oval Office address, Obama said that efforts to stop the spill
should soon "capture up to 90 percent of the oil leading out of the
well.''
No one should believe projections like that until the image on the
video shifts to a trickle and finally, thankfully stops.
ONE IMAGE captures the truth and enormity of the Gulf oil spill, even
more than the muck-soaked pelicans.
It's the live video feed of oil spewing into the ocean, which BP was forced to post on the Internet,
thanks to US Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts. Gaining
access to the video was a major battle. Now, the relentless scrutiny of
that undersea eye - actually 12 undersea eyes attached to a dozen
camera-bearing robots - keeps the pressure on the oil company.
It also keeps the pressure on President Obama as he tries to buff up a
tarnished commander-in-chief image. Whether Obama is meeting with BP
executives or walking along Gulf beaches, the camera never blinks on the
worst environmental disaster in US history.
It's a damning fountain of truth, brought to the public by Markey, a
fellow Democrat. Watching the brown crude gurgling in the corner of the
screen as Obama or BP executives address the crisis is akin to watching
the Dow drop when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner first unveiled the
administration's financial bail-out plan.
The BP-owned rig exploded on April 20 and sank on April 22. It took
several weeks days before BP released any film of the undersea leak, and
the company first showed only a few minutes of video. On May 19,
Markey, who chairs the House subcommittee on Energy and the Environment,
pressed scientists to assess the extent of the disaster. Their spill
estimates - up to 70,000 barrels a day - mirrored what one BP official
told Markey a week after the explosion, and were much higher than what
BP officials were telling the public. Afterwards, Markey demanded that
BP post the spill-cam or let Markey's office do it. Under increasing
public pressure, BP gave the video feed to Markey.
Shortly after it went live at 1:30 p.m. on May 20, the website - globalwarming.house.gov/spillcam
- crashed.
Markey went to battle once again, when he realized BP was providing
only one shot from one camera. Markey also challenged BP's plan to
completely shut down the video when it undertook the "top kill''
procedure, a strategy that ultimately failed to stop the gusher. When
news of the proposed black-out became public, BP backed down. Live feeds
from all 12 cameras have been available ever since.
The video feed is now available on other websites, including BP's.
But a computer in Markey's committee office in the basement of the
Longworth Building still runs all 12 camera feeds, 24/7, directly into
the pool feed for major network and cable programs.
"The spill-cam has allowed the public and independent scientists
access to the crime scene,'' said Markey. "This is a real time video of
BP's real world disaster.''
Markey said he still doesn't trust BP. During the next phase of the
effort to cap the spill, he wants BP to apply the fluorescent dye that
experts say is necessary to accurately measure the speed and quantity of
the oil that continues to spew.
The amount of oil is important, since BP is liable for every barrel
it spills. Markey believes the company deliberately tried to keep the
video from the public to limit its liability.
According to a lengthy article on the spill in Rolling Stone
magazine, the Obama administration also had access to the video "from
the earliest days of the disaster.''
Asked to respond, Markey ducked, saying, "The president said that if
there were one thing he would do over again, he would not have trusted
BP. In those first couple of weeks, I think that obviously BP was trying
to limit is liability rather than protect the livability of the Gulf.''
The video serves as a constant and powerful reminder of man's
encroachment on environment - "a crime against nature,'' as Markey puts
it.
It also measures rhetoric against reality.
In his Oval Office address, Obama said that efforts to stop the spill
should soon "capture up to 90 percent of the oil leading out of the
well.''
No one should believe projections like that until the image on the
video shifts to a trickle and finally, thankfully stops.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.