SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As states scramble to stay afloat -- how are they balancing their
budgets? On the backs of working women of course. The new big trend is
to cut subsidies for child care. And with child care -- poof -- a
critical lifeline to working moms is disappearing. The same states that
cut welfare entitlements in the 90s, forcing moms out to work, are now
cutting the subsidized child care that was promised in return for
workfare.
While the Obama government has provided some aid to states to keep
subsidies up, it is not nearly enough, and some states are just calling
it quits. In California, Governor Schwarzennegger, whose respect for
women is well known, recently proposed to eliminate the entire state
welfare and child care program entirely, affecting 1.4 million people
two thirds children.
In some places, Head Start programs that have been
in place for five decades, are competing for contributions from hedge
funds and running street fairs. Many will have to charge tuition for
the first time this September, exactly the opposite of the vision of
the program.
The bottom line: remember that line about poor women being
the canaries in society's coal mine. That sound you hear is them
choking. As spending on war -- and elections -- continues to rise,
we're suffocating our kids - and their caretakers.
If this is as test -
how much will we really give up? Our society, the richest in the world
by far, seems to be asking the question.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As states scramble to stay afloat -- how are they balancing their
budgets? On the backs of working women of course. The new big trend is
to cut subsidies for child care. And with child care -- poof -- a
critical lifeline to working moms is disappearing. The same states that
cut welfare entitlements in the 90s, forcing moms out to work, are now
cutting the subsidized child care that was promised in return for
workfare.
While the Obama government has provided some aid to states to keep
subsidies up, it is not nearly enough, and some states are just calling
it quits. In California, Governor Schwarzennegger, whose respect for
women is well known, recently proposed to eliminate the entire state
welfare and child care program entirely, affecting 1.4 million people
two thirds children.
In some places, Head Start programs that have been
in place for five decades, are competing for contributions from hedge
funds and running street fairs. Many will have to charge tuition for
the first time this September, exactly the opposite of the vision of
the program.
The bottom line: remember that line about poor women being
the canaries in society's coal mine. That sound you hear is them
choking. As spending on war -- and elections -- continues to rise,
we're suffocating our kids - and their caretakers.
If this is as test -
how much will we really give up? Our society, the richest in the world
by far, seems to be asking the question.
As states scramble to stay afloat -- how are they balancing their
budgets? On the backs of working women of course. The new big trend is
to cut subsidies for child care. And with child care -- poof -- a
critical lifeline to working moms is disappearing. The same states that
cut welfare entitlements in the 90s, forcing moms out to work, are now
cutting the subsidized child care that was promised in return for
workfare.
While the Obama government has provided some aid to states to keep
subsidies up, it is not nearly enough, and some states are just calling
it quits. In California, Governor Schwarzennegger, whose respect for
women is well known, recently proposed to eliminate the entire state
welfare and child care program entirely, affecting 1.4 million people
two thirds children.
In some places, Head Start programs that have been
in place for five decades, are competing for contributions from hedge
funds and running street fairs. Many will have to charge tuition for
the first time this September, exactly the opposite of the vision of
the program.
The bottom line: remember that line about poor women being
the canaries in society's coal mine. That sound you hear is them
choking. As spending on war -- and elections -- continues to rise,
we're suffocating our kids - and their caretakers.
If this is as test -
how much will we really give up? Our society, the richest in the world
by far, seems to be asking the question.