Delusion by Exclusion-The Damaging Impact of Global Media Misogyny

The issue of gender discrimination in the media is a deeply personal
issue to me because I am a writer who puts a lot of effort into
highlighting women's human rights issues. In other words, not only do I
write about this issue, I am also a victim of it. On the occasions that
I submit a piece for publication and it gets rejected and then I see
that the publication has far more bylines by men than women, I have to
wonder. Or more to the point, I don't.

The issue of gender discrimination in the media is a deeply personal
issue to me because I am a writer who puts a lot of effort into
highlighting women's human rights issues. In other words, not only do I
write about this issue, I am also a victim of it. On the occasions that
I submit a piece for publication and it gets rejected and then I see
that the publication has far more bylines by men than women, I have to
wonder. Or more to the point, I don't.

The systemic invisibilizing and trivializing of women's lives and
voices by the media is a deeply damaging misogyny and the preliminary
data from the latest Who Makes the News report confirms
that persistent media misogyny is alive and well throughout the world.
While there have been some improvements since 1995, the 2010 findings,
while not surprising, are truly appalling.

The findings in this preliminary report are based on an analysis of
6,902 news items containing 14,044 news subjects including people
interviewed in the news in 42 countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America,
the Caribbean region, Pacific Islands and Europe. The data for North
America has not yet been released.

Here are some of the highlights from lengthy and very illuminating
report (the final version will be out later this year):

It matters profoundly who and what is selected to appear
in news coverage and how individuals and events are portrayed. Equally,
it matters who is left out and what is not covered. The three previous
GMMPs showed that women are grossly underrepresented in news
coverage in contrast to men, resulting in news that paints a picture of
a world in which women are largely absent
. The studies
equally revealed a paucity of women's views and opinions in mainstream
news media content in contrast to men's perspectives, resulting
in a male-centered view of the world
. The Fourth GMMP has
produced mixed results as demonstrated in the key findings below.

Representation:

  • 24% of the people interviewed, heard, seen or read about in
    mainstream broadcast and print news are female.
  • Only 16% of all stories focus specifically on women.
  • Women have achieved near parity as givers of popular opinion in news
    stories. At the same time, less than one out of every five experts
    interviewed is female.
  • An analysis of media coverage on selected issues of special concern
    to women contained in the Beijing Platform for Action reveals such
    issues receive an average of less than 1.5% media attention each.
  • Of the three mediums, mainstream radio is least likely to contain
    news on issues of concern to women. Print news contained the highest
    proportion of stories on all five themes, suggesting that newspapers
    would be the most effective medium for issues of concern to women to
    find space in the mainstream news agenda.

Delivering the news:

  • Overall, news stories by female reporters are much fewer than news
    stories by male reporters. In 2010 the percentage of stories by female
    reporters on radio was lower than in 2005, a drastic drop from 45% to
    27%. 44% of stories on television were reported by women, up from 42%.
    Newspaper stories by female reporters increased from 29% to 35%.
  • News stories by female reporters are almost twice as likely to
    challenge gender stereotypes than stories by male reporters.
  • News stories by female reporters have considerably more female news
    subjects than stories by male reporters.

Journalistic practice:

  • Almost one half (48%) of all news stories reinforce gender
    stereotypes, while 8% of news stories challenge gender stereotypes.
  • Only 12% of news stories highlight issues of gender equality or
    inequality. The percentage of news stories that shed light on an aspect
    of gender equality or inequality in the story has tripled in the last
    five years. Nevertheless, stories that miss the opportunity to highlight
    (in) equality issues are by far more numerous.
  • Women are five times as likely as men to be portrayed in their roles
    as wives, mothers, etc.
  • Only 9% of news stories mention gender equality policies or human
    and women's rights legal instruments.

If you are thinking that the North American data when it comes out
will paint a vastly better picture, think again. The NPR ombudsman recently reported that NPR
is a long way from gender parity finding that,

12 outside commentators appeared at least 20 times in
the last 15 months. The only woman is former NPR staffer, Cokie
Roberts.

Otherwise, males dominate, especially on subjects of sports, politics
and the economy.

NPR listeners heard 2,502 male sources and 877 female sources on the
shows we sampled. In other words, only 26 percent of the 3,379 voices
were female, while 74 percent were male.

Numerous other reports also point to gender
imbalances in the U.S. media (Be sure to also see the Gender, Media and
Power slide show that can be accessed on the right sidebar of the Feminist
Peace Network
website as well as the numerous posts on
FPN and articles that I have written on the subject as
well).

There is no shortage of examples of the persistent invisibilizing
and objectification of women. This list of 25 Twitter "Insiders" to follow only
contains 4 women. And take a look at this very disturbing documentation
of mainstream advertising porn as well.

Here in Kentucky where I live, the Louisville Courier Journal
publishes a magazine called HerScene, a relatively new publication
that came into being roughly around the time that print media hit the
financial skids and the CJ radically cut the size of the newspaper.

It arrives every few months with my morning newspaper and is filled
with helpful tidbits on wardrobe, grooming, home decorating,
entertaining and advertisements. Well, actually it is mostly
advertisements. Is there a similar publication for men? Of course
not. In other words, we women have been tasked the very important job
of shopping til we drop in order to keep the male-centric print media
alive.

As I said at the outset, this is a very personal issue to me. The
statistics above document both the challenge women in media face getting
their voices heard and the difficulty getting coverage of issues that
impact women's lives. There are days I think my time would be equally
well served lying in bed with a romance novel eating bon bons or hiking
along the edge of the sea. And I do those things, but mostly I keep
writing and speaking out, even though the odds of my work being
published are worse than awful.

While I want to believe that it couldn't be as bad as it is, the
truth is that what we are told is the truth is really a very
male-centric vision because it does not adequately include the needs or
voices of more than half the population of the world. And that
skewered story isn't the news, it is a dangerous fiction that we cannot afford to continue to allow to be perpetuated.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.