To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×

Paranoid Politics: Say Hello, Wave Goodbye

A few weeks ago we had Joe Stack, crashing his plane
into an IRS building in the name of tax freedom. Next up: last week's
assault on the Pentagon at the hands of John Patrick Bedell in which two
Pentagon police officers were wounded before the well-dressed gunman was shot
and killed.

FBI investigators are looking at a number of Web posts
believed to have been written by Bedell. One post, The New York Times reports, speaks of the author's
interest in "establishing the truth of events such as the September 11
demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains
itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and
murder."

Another post reads: "I have an intense personal
desire for freedom...my desire for freedom is inevitably centered on the role
of government in society."

As cliche as Richard Hofstadter's celebrated 1964
essay "The Paranoid
Style in American Politics" may have become, it's impossible to
ignore its lasting relevance.

"American politics has often been an arena for
angry minds. In recent years we have seen angry minds at work mainly among
extreme right-wingers, who have now demonstrated in the Goldwater movement how
much political leverage can be got out of the animosities and passions of a
small minority. But behind this I believe there is a style of mind that is far
from new and that is not necessarily right-wing."

The essay is worth revisiting, if only to remind
ourselves that the Joe Stack's and John Bedell's of the world are
not necessarily certifiably nuts, which is often how they are characterized by
those invoking the "paranoid style" theory.

But Hofstadter was careful to note that "in using
the expression 'paranoid style' I am not speaking in a clinical
sense, but borrowing a clinical term for other purposes."

In fact, the late historian wrote, "the idea of
the paranoid style as a force in politics would have little contemporary
relevance or historical value if it were applied only to men with profoundly
disturbed minds. It is the use of paranoid modes of expression by more or less
normal people that makes the phenomenon significant."

So even if you're not into history, you gotta
give it up to Hofstadter for offering insights that are still useful today in
identifying the politics of paranoia - from the near evil omnipotence ascribed
to political enemies ("a kind of amoral superman") to the obsession
with pedantry ("McCarthy's 96-page pamphlet McCarthyism contains no
less than 313 footnote references").

Not a happy diagnosis, for sure, but useful in a world
full of birthers, "death-panel" demagogues, and tea party patriots.

And though neither Stack nor Bedell have been tied to
any particular hate group, it would be naive to think they weren't
animated by the same re-surging spirit discussed in a new report by the
well-known hate-group tracking organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
It's no coincidence conservatives have called Stack a hero.

The SPLC report, "Rage on the
Right," documents a 244 percent increase in the number of active Patriot
groups in 2009, up from 149 groups in 2008 to 512 groups in 2009.

Militias - "the paramilitary arm of the Patriot
movement" - were a big reason for the growth, with the number of militias
increasing from 42 in 2008 to 127 in 2009.

According to the report, these groups have been stoked
over the nation's shifting demographics, rising debt, economic
stagnation, and a laundry-list of Obama administration initiatives labeled as
"socialist" and/or "fascist."

Mark Potok, editor of SPLC's Intelligence Report, sees it as cause for
"grave concern," considering that "the people associated with
the Patriot movement during its 1990s heyday produced an enormous amount of
violence, most dramatically the Oklahoma
City bombing that left 168 people dead."

Keep in mind, Potok says, the Patriot movement has
embedded itself deep into the conservative political scene. "The
'tea parties' and similar groups that have sprung up in recent
months cannot fairly be considered extremist groups, but they are shot through
with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism," the
report says.

The most sobering aspect about paranoid politics - to
resurrect Hofstadter again - is that "it comes in waves of different
intensity" and "appears to be all but ineradicable."

But that shouldn't be a
cause for despair because Stefan Zweig is right: "every wave, regardless
of how high and forceful it crests, must eventually collapse within
itself."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

A few weeks ago we had Joe Stack, crashing his plane
into an IRS building in the name of tax freedom. Next up: last week's
assault on the Pentagon at the hands of John Patrick Bedell in which two
Pentagon police officers were wounded before the well-dressed gunman was shot
and killed.

FBI investigators are looking at a number of Web posts
believed to have been written by Bedell. One post, The New York Times reports, speaks of the author's
interest in "establishing the truth of events such as the September 11
demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains
itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and
murder."

Another post reads: "I have an intense personal
desire for freedom...my desire for freedom is inevitably centered on the role
of government in society."

As cliche as Richard Hofstadter's celebrated 1964
essay "The Paranoid
Style in American Politics" may have become, it's impossible to
ignore its lasting relevance.

"American politics has often been an arena for
angry minds. In recent years we have seen angry minds at work mainly among
extreme right-wingers, who have now demonstrated in the Goldwater movement how
much political leverage can be got out of the animosities and passions of a
small minority. But behind this I believe there is a style of mind that is far
from new and that is not necessarily right-wing."

The essay is worth revisiting, if only to remind
ourselves that the Joe Stack's and John Bedell's of the world are
not necessarily certifiably nuts, which is often how they are characterized by
those invoking the "paranoid style" theory.

But Hofstadter was careful to note that "in using
the expression 'paranoid style' I am not speaking in a clinical
sense, but borrowing a clinical term for other purposes."

In fact, the late historian wrote, "the idea of
the paranoid style as a force in politics would have little contemporary
relevance or historical value if it were applied only to men with profoundly
disturbed minds. It is the use of paranoid modes of expression by more or less
normal people that makes the phenomenon significant."

So even if you're not into history, you gotta
give it up to Hofstadter for offering insights that are still useful today in
identifying the politics of paranoia - from the near evil omnipotence ascribed
to political enemies ("a kind of amoral superman") to the obsession
with pedantry ("McCarthy's 96-page pamphlet McCarthyism contains no
less than 313 footnote references").

Not a happy diagnosis, for sure, but useful in a world
full of birthers, "death-panel" demagogues, and tea party patriots.

And though neither Stack nor Bedell have been tied to
any particular hate group, it would be naive to think they weren't
animated by the same re-surging spirit discussed in a new report by the
well-known hate-group tracking organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
It's no coincidence conservatives have called Stack a hero.

The SPLC report, "Rage on the
Right," documents a 244 percent increase in the number of active Patriot
groups in 2009, up from 149 groups in 2008 to 512 groups in 2009.

Militias - "the paramilitary arm of the Patriot
movement" - were a big reason for the growth, with the number of militias
increasing from 42 in 2008 to 127 in 2009.

According to the report, these groups have been stoked
over the nation's shifting demographics, rising debt, economic
stagnation, and a laundry-list of Obama administration initiatives labeled as
"socialist" and/or "fascist."

Mark Potok, editor of SPLC's Intelligence Report, sees it as cause for
"grave concern," considering that "the people associated with
the Patriot movement during its 1990s heyday produced an enormous amount of
violence, most dramatically the Oklahoma
City bombing that left 168 people dead."

Keep in mind, Potok says, the Patriot movement has
embedded itself deep into the conservative political scene. "The
'tea parties' and similar groups that have sprung up in recent
months cannot fairly be considered extremist groups, but they are shot through
with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism," the
report says.

The most sobering aspect about paranoid politics - to
resurrect Hofstadter again - is that "it comes in waves of different
intensity" and "appears to be all but ineradicable."

But that shouldn't be a
cause for despair because Stefan Zweig is right: "every wave, regardless
of how high and forceful it crests, must eventually collapse within
itself."

A few weeks ago we had Joe Stack, crashing his plane
into an IRS building in the name of tax freedom. Next up: last week's
assault on the Pentagon at the hands of John Patrick Bedell in which two
Pentagon police officers were wounded before the well-dressed gunman was shot
and killed.

FBI investigators are looking at a number of Web posts
believed to have been written by Bedell. One post, The New York Times reports, speaks of the author's
interest in "establishing the truth of events such as the September 11
demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains
itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and
murder."

Another post reads: "I have an intense personal
desire for freedom...my desire for freedom is inevitably centered on the role
of government in society."

As cliche as Richard Hofstadter's celebrated 1964
essay "The Paranoid
Style in American Politics" may have become, it's impossible to
ignore its lasting relevance.

"American politics has often been an arena for
angry minds. In recent years we have seen angry minds at work mainly among
extreme right-wingers, who have now demonstrated in the Goldwater movement how
much political leverage can be got out of the animosities and passions of a
small minority. But behind this I believe there is a style of mind that is far
from new and that is not necessarily right-wing."

The essay is worth revisiting, if only to remind
ourselves that the Joe Stack's and John Bedell's of the world are
not necessarily certifiably nuts, which is often how they are characterized by
those invoking the "paranoid style" theory.

But Hofstadter was careful to note that "in using
the expression 'paranoid style' I am not speaking in a clinical
sense, but borrowing a clinical term for other purposes."

In fact, the late historian wrote, "the idea of
the paranoid style as a force in politics would have little contemporary
relevance or historical value if it were applied only to men with profoundly
disturbed minds. It is the use of paranoid modes of expression by more or less
normal people that makes the phenomenon significant."

So even if you're not into history, you gotta
give it up to Hofstadter for offering insights that are still useful today in
identifying the politics of paranoia - from the near evil omnipotence ascribed
to political enemies ("a kind of amoral superman") to the obsession
with pedantry ("McCarthy's 96-page pamphlet McCarthyism contains no
less than 313 footnote references").

Not a happy diagnosis, for sure, but useful in a world
full of birthers, "death-panel" demagogues, and tea party patriots.

And though neither Stack nor Bedell have been tied to
any particular hate group, it would be naive to think they weren't
animated by the same re-surging spirit discussed in a new report by the
well-known hate-group tracking organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
It's no coincidence conservatives have called Stack a hero.

The SPLC report, "Rage on the
Right," documents a 244 percent increase in the number of active Patriot
groups in 2009, up from 149 groups in 2008 to 512 groups in 2009.

Militias - "the paramilitary arm of the Patriot
movement" - were a big reason for the growth, with the number of militias
increasing from 42 in 2008 to 127 in 2009.

According to the report, these groups have been stoked
over the nation's shifting demographics, rising debt, economic
stagnation, and a laundry-list of Obama administration initiatives labeled as
"socialist" and/or "fascist."

Mark Potok, editor of SPLC's Intelligence Report, sees it as cause for
"grave concern," considering that "the people associated with
the Patriot movement during its 1990s heyday produced an enormous amount of
violence, most dramatically the Oklahoma
City bombing that left 168 people dead."

Keep in mind, Potok says, the Patriot movement has
embedded itself deep into the conservative political scene. "The
'tea parties' and similar groups that have sprung up in recent
months cannot fairly be considered extremist groups, but they are shot through
with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism," the
report says.

The most sobering aspect about paranoid politics - to
resurrect Hofstadter again - is that "it comes in waves of different
intensity" and "appears to be all but ineradicable."

But that shouldn't be a
cause for despair because Stefan Zweig is right: "every wave, regardless
of how high and forceful it crests, must eventually collapse within
itself."