

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
If going head to head with bankers alone is too scary for Warren
Buffett, why are the rest of us being thrown to the financial wolves?
Warren Buffett's annual letter to his shareholders came out this weekend. The gist of it is "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
That's Buffett, one of the world's richest men, warning his clients
that their financial advisers' advice is skewed by the financial system
in which they operate -- which is a very biased place.
If going head to head with bankers alone is too scary for Warren
Buffett, why are the rest of us being thrown to the financial wolves?
Warren Buffett's annual letter to his shareholders came out this weekend. The gist of it is "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
That's Buffett, one of the world's richest men, warning his clients
that their financial advisers' advice is skewed by the financial system
in which they operate -- which is a very biased place.
Merit or no merit -- and no matter how it turns out -- bankers make
fees off deal making, so deal-making's what they push. There' s no
banker's bonus for advising clients to wise up or sit tight.
So investors need independent protection, argues Buffett. Don't go it alone.
If only Buffett worked for us.
In the Senate, chair Christopher Dodd seems to have given up on
protecting consumers. An independent agency to protect against abuse by
financial institutions was supposed to be the consumer part of the quid
pro quo for accepting the taxpayer bailout of banks.
Now -- ironically, just as Buffett's letter was being published, the
man it'll take to make it happen -- Christopher Dodd -- is agreeing to
defang the agency, strip it of independence and most prosecution power
-- its a victory for all those Republicans and business groups who've
poured billions --inclulding billions of bailout dollars - into
lobbying against any agency with teeth.
Dodd seems to be giving up. But he hasn't even fought for the agency
yet. He could start by inviting the Oracle of Omaha to testify. Banks
too skewed for Berkshire Hathaway investors shouldn't be loosed on us.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
If going head to head with bankers alone is too scary for Warren
Buffett, why are the rest of us being thrown to the financial wolves?
Warren Buffett's annual letter to his shareholders came out this weekend. The gist of it is "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
That's Buffett, one of the world's richest men, warning his clients
that their financial advisers' advice is skewed by the financial system
in which they operate -- which is a very biased place.
Merit or no merit -- and no matter how it turns out -- bankers make
fees off deal making, so deal-making's what they push. There' s no
banker's bonus for advising clients to wise up or sit tight.
So investors need independent protection, argues Buffett. Don't go it alone.
If only Buffett worked for us.
In the Senate, chair Christopher Dodd seems to have given up on
protecting consumers. An independent agency to protect against abuse by
financial institutions was supposed to be the consumer part of the quid
pro quo for accepting the taxpayer bailout of banks.
Now -- ironically, just as Buffett's letter was being published, the
man it'll take to make it happen -- Christopher Dodd -- is agreeing to
defang the agency, strip it of independence and most prosecution power
-- its a victory for all those Republicans and business groups who've
poured billions --inclulding billions of bailout dollars - into
lobbying against any agency with teeth.
Dodd seems to be giving up. But he hasn't even fought for the agency
yet. He could start by inviting the Oracle of Omaha to testify. Banks
too skewed for Berkshire Hathaway investors shouldn't be loosed on us.
If going head to head with bankers alone is too scary for Warren
Buffett, why are the rest of us being thrown to the financial wolves?
Warren Buffett's annual letter to his shareholders came out this weekend. The gist of it is "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
That's Buffett, one of the world's richest men, warning his clients
that their financial advisers' advice is skewed by the financial system
in which they operate -- which is a very biased place.
Merit or no merit -- and no matter how it turns out -- bankers make
fees off deal making, so deal-making's what they push. There' s no
banker's bonus for advising clients to wise up or sit tight.
So investors need independent protection, argues Buffett. Don't go it alone.
If only Buffett worked for us.
In the Senate, chair Christopher Dodd seems to have given up on
protecting consumers. An independent agency to protect against abuse by
financial institutions was supposed to be the consumer part of the quid
pro quo for accepting the taxpayer bailout of banks.
Now -- ironically, just as Buffett's letter was being published, the
man it'll take to make it happen -- Christopher Dodd -- is agreeing to
defang the agency, strip it of independence and most prosecution power
-- its a victory for all those Republicans and business groups who've
poured billions --inclulding billions of bailout dollars - into
lobbying against any agency with teeth.
Dodd seems to be giving up. But he hasn't even fought for the agency
yet. He could start by inviting the Oracle of Omaha to testify. Banks
too skewed for Berkshire Hathaway investors shouldn't be loosed on us.