SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Give Higher Priority to Farm to School Programs
The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held a
conference call last week with about a thousand of his closest
friends to talk about the Obama administration's initiatives on
child nutrition and physical activity. He started by describing the
twin problems that make this a high priority for the
administration: obesity and hunger. A third of the nation's
children are overweight, and 16.5 million children live in
food-insecure households -- those with hunger or fear of
starvation.
Feb 16, 2010
The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held a
conference call last week with about a thousand of his closest
friends to talk about the Obama administration's initiatives on
child nutrition and physical activity. He started by describing the
twin problems that make this a high priority for the
administration: obesity and hunger. A third of the nation's
children are overweight, and 16.5 million children live in
food-insecure households -- those with hunger or fear of
starvation.
For decades, the federal government has sought to address child
hunger through programs such as the National School Lunch Program,
School Breakfast Program, Snack Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program. These programs are
coming up for review as part of the reauthorization of the Child
Nutrition Act, which will occur this year, and attention will also
be given to how they reduce obesity. Vilsack says the Obama
administration is committing an additional $1 billion to this
effort.
However, I was disappointed not to hear from Secretary Vilsack
or see in the Obama budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2011 a clear
commitment to fund Farm to School programs, which aim to get
locally grown food served to children in school cafeterias. Among
the groups working to do so are the National Farm to School
Network and the Community
Food Security Coalition.
Yes, Vilsack did say that it makes sense to have local farmers
selling produce to schools, he likes the teaching as well as
nutritional opportunities of school gardens, and he wants to see
such initiatives continue. But he didn't commit funding needed to
make it happen. The $50 million that Farm to School initiatives
require is minuscule compared to the overall costs of most child
nutrition programs. Such seed money is needed to find ways to offer
longer-term structural improvements in school food preparation
kitchens and the distribution system. In the meantime, it helps
children gain better eating habits and builds new markets for
farmers and stronger rural economies today.
Farm to School initiatives are moving forward in many states,
and Wisconsin
is one of them. Bills in both houses of the Wisconsin
Legislature would create technical assistance and other support for
schools to purchase local foods, start school gardens, conduct
creative nutrition education, and implement other Farm to School
initiatives. Happily, at a time when so few things are bipartisan,
the obvious good sense of Farm to School's approach has drawn
support from both parties. And it's no surprise that in the
Assembly, the bill's lead sponsor is the Agriculture chair, Amy Sue
Vruwink, who sees the economic opportunities the legislation offers
farmers and rural communities as well as its health benefits for
children.
First lady Michelle Obama recently launched an initiative aiming
to tackle obesity through physical fitness, the Let's Move!
Program. It got and deserves a lot of press because, like Farm to
School, it applies practical good sense to the way schools treat
two of the building blocks of healthy children: healthy food and
plenty of exercise. And if we're really smart, as we build
healthier children, we'll also be building healthier communities
and healthier economies. Farm to School initiatives at the state
and federal level are smart economics and deserve support.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Capital Times
Margaret Krome
Margaret Krome is policy program director for the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute in East Troy, Wis. She coordinates the annual national grass-roots campaign to fund federal programs supported by the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and helps develop federal, state and local programs and policies supporting environmentally sound, profitable and socially responsible agriculture. Margaret writes a semimonthly column for The Capital Times (Madison, Wisconsin)
The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held a
conference call last week with about a thousand of his closest
friends to talk about the Obama administration's initiatives on
child nutrition and physical activity. He started by describing the
twin problems that make this a high priority for the
administration: obesity and hunger. A third of the nation's
children are overweight, and 16.5 million children live in
food-insecure households -- those with hunger or fear of
starvation.
For decades, the federal government has sought to address child
hunger through programs such as the National School Lunch Program,
School Breakfast Program, Snack Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program. These programs are
coming up for review as part of the reauthorization of the Child
Nutrition Act, which will occur this year, and attention will also
be given to how they reduce obesity. Vilsack says the Obama
administration is committing an additional $1 billion to this
effort.
However, I was disappointed not to hear from Secretary Vilsack
or see in the Obama budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2011 a clear
commitment to fund Farm to School programs, which aim to get
locally grown food served to children in school cafeterias. Among
the groups working to do so are the National Farm to School
Network and the Community
Food Security Coalition.
Yes, Vilsack did say that it makes sense to have local farmers
selling produce to schools, he likes the teaching as well as
nutritional opportunities of school gardens, and he wants to see
such initiatives continue. But he didn't commit funding needed to
make it happen. The $50 million that Farm to School initiatives
require is minuscule compared to the overall costs of most child
nutrition programs. Such seed money is needed to find ways to offer
longer-term structural improvements in school food preparation
kitchens and the distribution system. In the meantime, it helps
children gain better eating habits and builds new markets for
farmers and stronger rural economies today.
Farm to School initiatives are moving forward in many states,
and Wisconsin
is one of them. Bills in both houses of the Wisconsin
Legislature would create technical assistance and other support for
schools to purchase local foods, start school gardens, conduct
creative nutrition education, and implement other Farm to School
initiatives. Happily, at a time when so few things are bipartisan,
the obvious good sense of Farm to School's approach has drawn
support from both parties. And it's no surprise that in the
Assembly, the bill's lead sponsor is the Agriculture chair, Amy Sue
Vruwink, who sees the economic opportunities the legislation offers
farmers and rural communities as well as its health benefits for
children.
First lady Michelle Obama recently launched an initiative aiming
to tackle obesity through physical fitness, the Let's Move!
Program. It got and deserves a lot of press because, like Farm to
School, it applies practical good sense to the way schools treat
two of the building blocks of healthy children: healthy food and
plenty of exercise. And if we're really smart, as we build
healthier children, we'll also be building healthier communities
and healthier economies. Farm to School initiatives at the state
and federal level are smart economics and deserve support.
Margaret Krome
Margaret Krome is policy program director for the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute in East Troy, Wis. She coordinates the annual national grass-roots campaign to fund federal programs supported by the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and helps develop federal, state and local programs and policies supporting environmentally sound, profitable and socially responsible agriculture. Margaret writes a semimonthly column for The Capital Times (Madison, Wisconsin)
The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, held a
conference call last week with about a thousand of his closest
friends to talk about the Obama administration's initiatives on
child nutrition and physical activity. He started by describing the
twin problems that make this a high priority for the
administration: obesity and hunger. A third of the nation's
children are overweight, and 16.5 million children live in
food-insecure households -- those with hunger or fear of
starvation.
For decades, the federal government has sought to address child
hunger through programs such as the National School Lunch Program,
School Breakfast Program, Snack Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Program, and Child and Adult Care Food Program. These programs are
coming up for review as part of the reauthorization of the Child
Nutrition Act, which will occur this year, and attention will also
be given to how they reduce obesity. Vilsack says the Obama
administration is committing an additional $1 billion to this
effort.
However, I was disappointed not to hear from Secretary Vilsack
or see in the Obama budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2011 a clear
commitment to fund Farm to School programs, which aim to get
locally grown food served to children in school cafeterias. Among
the groups working to do so are the National Farm to School
Network and the Community
Food Security Coalition.
Yes, Vilsack did say that it makes sense to have local farmers
selling produce to schools, he likes the teaching as well as
nutritional opportunities of school gardens, and he wants to see
such initiatives continue. But he didn't commit funding needed to
make it happen. The $50 million that Farm to School initiatives
require is minuscule compared to the overall costs of most child
nutrition programs. Such seed money is needed to find ways to offer
longer-term structural improvements in school food preparation
kitchens and the distribution system. In the meantime, it helps
children gain better eating habits and builds new markets for
farmers and stronger rural economies today.
Farm to School initiatives are moving forward in many states,
and Wisconsin
is one of them. Bills in both houses of the Wisconsin
Legislature would create technical assistance and other support for
schools to purchase local foods, start school gardens, conduct
creative nutrition education, and implement other Farm to School
initiatives. Happily, at a time when so few things are bipartisan,
the obvious good sense of Farm to School's approach has drawn
support from both parties. And it's no surprise that in the
Assembly, the bill's lead sponsor is the Agriculture chair, Amy Sue
Vruwink, who sees the economic opportunities the legislation offers
farmers and rural communities as well as its health benefits for
children.
First lady Michelle Obama recently launched an initiative aiming
to tackle obesity through physical fitness, the Let's Move!
Program. It got and deserves a lot of press because, like Farm to
School, it applies practical good sense to the way schools treat
two of the building blocks of healthy children: healthy food and
plenty of exercise. And if we're really smart, as we build
healthier children, we'll also be building healthier communities
and healthier economies. Farm to School initiatives at the state
and federal level are smart economics and deserve support.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.