SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The recent Taliban attacks on Kabul provide another wake-up call
about why this war in Afghanistan simply isn't going to work. It won't
bring security to Afghans. It won't turn Afghanistan into a democracy.
And it won't make us safer.
In fact, the war killed more people in Afghanistan last year
than the year before-40 percent more civilians, according to the United
Nations. And the body count this year is already shaping up to be
higher than last year. That goes for U.S. troops too.
And President Obama's escalation, the 30,000 new troops he just
announced he's sending to Afghanistan? That's not helping either. The
Taliban have mostly stayed in the countryside, based in the small
villages where almost 80 percent of Afghans live. But now, after Obama
announced that the additional troops would be deployed in Afghanistan's
"population centers," meaning the cities, guess where the Taliban
headed for their most recent assault?
The same thing happens when U.S. troops go after Taliban or
al-Qaeda targets-they may or may not kill the "right" person, but they
consistently do kill a whole bunch of people guilty only of being in
the very wrong place at the very wrong time. The "wrong" people get
killed.
And what happens then? The grieving and outraged family,
friends, and tribe members of those "wrong" people get angry. Very
angry. They start to hate those who killed their family members-us-even
if they never did before. And some of them turn to violence when they
never would have before. This isn't new-military and political leaders
acknowledge that we're creating more terrorists than we're killing. And
still the policymakers aren't hearing it.
So it doesn't make us safer. And here at home we have another
problem too. Alongside the horrifying human cost-young soldiers killed,
others coming home with horrifying life-shattering injuries, others
returning to face traumatic brain injury and PTSD-we have to pay the
financial cost for this war.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost us $950
billion. Yes, BILLION. That's not counting the $137 billion Congress
appropriated for spending between now and September. And that also
doesn't count the cost of those 30,000 new troops going to Afghanistan,
which will cost roughly $30 billion more just for their first year.
Altogether, that means by the end of this year we will have
spent about $1.08 trillion. Yes, TRILLION-a number so big it's
practically incomprehensible.
What else could we do with that money? Well, just the cost of
the current escalation could provide about six million people with
health care. Or generate 600,000 well-paid green jobs.
Which is more likely to make us safer? Opposition to the U.S.
war in Afghanistan, which peaked at almost 60 percent just a month or
so ago, has dropped after Obama's escalation speech at West Point.
We've got a lot of work to do to make sure his administration knows
this war won't make us safer, and it just costs too much-too many lives
and too much money. Are you listening, President Obama?
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The recent Taliban attacks on Kabul provide another wake-up call
about why this war in Afghanistan simply isn't going to work. It won't
bring security to Afghans. It won't turn Afghanistan into a democracy.
And it won't make us safer.
In fact, the war killed more people in Afghanistan last year
than the year before-40 percent more civilians, according to the United
Nations. And the body count this year is already shaping up to be
higher than last year. That goes for U.S. troops too.
And President Obama's escalation, the 30,000 new troops he just
announced he's sending to Afghanistan? That's not helping either. The
Taliban have mostly stayed in the countryside, based in the small
villages where almost 80 percent of Afghans live. But now, after Obama
announced that the additional troops would be deployed in Afghanistan's
"population centers," meaning the cities, guess where the Taliban
headed for their most recent assault?
The same thing happens when U.S. troops go after Taliban or
al-Qaeda targets-they may or may not kill the "right" person, but they
consistently do kill a whole bunch of people guilty only of being in
the very wrong place at the very wrong time. The "wrong" people get
killed.
And what happens then? The grieving and outraged family,
friends, and tribe members of those "wrong" people get angry. Very
angry. They start to hate those who killed their family members-us-even
if they never did before. And some of them turn to violence when they
never would have before. This isn't new-military and political leaders
acknowledge that we're creating more terrorists than we're killing. And
still the policymakers aren't hearing it.
So it doesn't make us safer. And here at home we have another
problem too. Alongside the horrifying human cost-young soldiers killed,
others coming home with horrifying life-shattering injuries, others
returning to face traumatic brain injury and PTSD-we have to pay the
financial cost for this war.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost us $950
billion. Yes, BILLION. That's not counting the $137 billion Congress
appropriated for spending between now and September. And that also
doesn't count the cost of those 30,000 new troops going to Afghanistan,
which will cost roughly $30 billion more just for their first year.
Altogether, that means by the end of this year we will have
spent about $1.08 trillion. Yes, TRILLION-a number so big it's
practically incomprehensible.
What else could we do with that money? Well, just the cost of
the current escalation could provide about six million people with
health care. Or generate 600,000 well-paid green jobs.
Which is more likely to make us safer? Opposition to the U.S.
war in Afghanistan, which peaked at almost 60 percent just a month or
so ago, has dropped after Obama's escalation speech at West Point.
We've got a lot of work to do to make sure his administration knows
this war won't make us safer, and it just costs too much-too many lives
and too much money. Are you listening, President Obama?
The recent Taliban attacks on Kabul provide another wake-up call
about why this war in Afghanistan simply isn't going to work. It won't
bring security to Afghans. It won't turn Afghanistan into a democracy.
And it won't make us safer.
In fact, the war killed more people in Afghanistan last year
than the year before-40 percent more civilians, according to the United
Nations. And the body count this year is already shaping up to be
higher than last year. That goes for U.S. troops too.
And President Obama's escalation, the 30,000 new troops he just
announced he's sending to Afghanistan? That's not helping either. The
Taliban have mostly stayed in the countryside, based in the small
villages where almost 80 percent of Afghans live. But now, after Obama
announced that the additional troops would be deployed in Afghanistan's
"population centers," meaning the cities, guess where the Taliban
headed for their most recent assault?
The same thing happens when U.S. troops go after Taliban or
al-Qaeda targets-they may or may not kill the "right" person, but they
consistently do kill a whole bunch of people guilty only of being in
the very wrong place at the very wrong time. The "wrong" people get
killed.
And what happens then? The grieving and outraged family,
friends, and tribe members of those "wrong" people get angry. Very
angry. They start to hate those who killed their family members-us-even
if they never did before. And some of them turn to violence when they
never would have before. This isn't new-military and political leaders
acknowledge that we're creating more terrorists than we're killing. And
still the policymakers aren't hearing it.
So it doesn't make us safer. And here at home we have another
problem too. Alongside the horrifying human cost-young soldiers killed,
others coming home with horrifying life-shattering injuries, others
returning to face traumatic brain injury and PTSD-we have to pay the
financial cost for this war.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost us $950
billion. Yes, BILLION. That's not counting the $137 billion Congress
appropriated for spending between now and September. And that also
doesn't count the cost of those 30,000 new troops going to Afghanistan,
which will cost roughly $30 billion more just for their first year.
Altogether, that means by the end of this year we will have
spent about $1.08 trillion. Yes, TRILLION-a number so big it's
practically incomprehensible.
What else could we do with that money? Well, just the cost of
the current escalation could provide about six million people with
health care. Or generate 600,000 well-paid green jobs.
Which is more likely to make us safer? Opposition to the U.S.
war in Afghanistan, which peaked at almost 60 percent just a month or
so ago, has dropped after Obama's escalation speech at West Point.
We've got a lot of work to do to make sure his administration knows
this war won't make us safer, and it just costs too much-too many lives
and too much money. Are you listening, President Obama?