Denying Responsibility for the Wars One Cheers On

David Brooks' column today
perfectly illustrates what lies at the core of our political
discourse: namely, self-loving tribalistic blindness laced with a
pathological refusal to accept responsibility for one's actions.
Brooks claims there is a unique evil that one finds in the "fringes of
the Muslim world":

Most people
select stories that lead toward cooperation and goodness. But over the
past few decades a malevolent narrative has emerged.

That
narrative has emerged on the fringes of the Muslim world. It is a
narrative that sees human history as a war between Islam on the one
side and Christianity and Judaism on the other. This narrative causes its adherents to shrink their circle of concern. They don't see others as fully human.They come to believe others can be blamelessly murdered and that, in fact, it is admirable to do so.

This
narrative is embraced by a small minority. But it has caused
incredible amounts of suffering within the Muslim world, in Israel, in
the U.S. and elsewhere. With their suicide bombings and terrorist acts,
adherents to this narrative have made themselves central to global
politics. They are the ones who go into crowded rooms, shout "Allahu akbar," or "God is great," and then start murdering.

But Brooks himself was a vehement, vicious advocate for the attack on Iraq, which caused this:

The
2003 US-led invasion of Iraq has resulted in the deaths of many Iraqi
civilians . . . Many international organizations, governments and
non-governmental organizations have counted excess civilian casualties using such methods; however all have reported different numbers. Reports range from 128,000 to 1,033,000.

That's
at least 128,000 innocent human beings -- at least -- whose lives were
eradicated by the war Brooks repeatedly cheered on. It also resulted
in this: "More
than 4 million Iraqis have now been displaced by violence in the
country." But Brooks accuses Islamic fanatics -- but not himself -- of
"causing incredible amounts of suffering."

Brooks also justified the Israeli attack on Gaza, including its worst excesses -- a war that wiped out the lives of 1,400 Palestinians (including 252 children under the age of 16) and that entailed "the
shooting of [Gazan] civilians with white flags, the firing of white
phosphorus shells and charges that Israeli soldiers used Palestinian
men as human shields," all of which, according to a U.N. investigation,
were "the result of deliberate guidance issued to soldiers." He also cheered on the Israeli bombing campaign of Lebanon and derided those calling for a cease-fire, even as the war wiped out more than 1,000 Lebanese people,
at least 300 of whom were women and children, during which "Israeli
warplanes also targeted many moving vehicles that turned out to be
carrying only civilians trying to flee the conflict." And Brooks is
now demanding escalation of the war in yet another Muslim country, this one in Afghanistan -- making it the fourth separate war on Muslims he's cheered on in the last six years alone.

So
here's a person who is constantly advocating and justifying the
killing, bombing, and slaughtering of Muslims, including well over 100,000 innocent civilians. And yet today he writes a column saying: Look over there at those radical Muslims; can you believe how degraded and inhumane they are? In fact, he says, "they"
-- those Muslims over there -- "don't see others as fully human. They
come to believe others can be blamelessly murdered and that, in fact,
it is admirable to do so." That's from the same person who cheerleads
for the endless deaths of Muslims and destruction of the Muslim world
while thinking that it makes him strong, resolute, Churchillian, righteous and noble
-- exactly that which he accuses "fringe Muslims" of doing. And even
as he blames the U.S. for "absolving" radical Muslims for the "evil" of
their choices, Brooks will never make the connection between what he
does and its results because he believes he is free from accountability
and that his righteousness justifies the killings he desires -- again,
exactly that which he says today is the hallmark of Islamic
monsters ("They come to believe others can be blamelessly murdered and
that, in fact, it is admirable to do so").

The
tribalistic narcissism and depraved refusal to accept responsibility
for the consequences of one's actions on vivid display here is hardly
unique to Brooks. The very same people who express such moral outrage
and self-righteous horror over events like the Fort Hood shootings
themselves have immense amounts of innocent human blood on their hands,
but they simply avert their eyes from what they have caused or believe
that they are too inherently Good to be responsible, let alone
culpable, for what they unleash.