SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Reckoning With Ourselves: Malik Nadal Hasan
Nov 08, 2009
The news that a gunman who killed 12 people and injured 31 at the Ft. Hood Army Base in Texas sent me scurrying in anxiety for more information. In addition to the tragic deaths of so many servicemen and women, my fear was that it would be someone who was not Anglo, and even worse, would be an immigrant, or the possibly the worst outcome in the post 9/11 climate-that the shooter was somehow connected to being Muslim.
Indeed, my worst fears were borne out in very little time: Malik Nidal Hasan was a Major in the U.S. Army, serving as a psychiatrist. Set to deploy soon to Iraq or Afghanistan, Maj. Hasan was very upset. His concern, it was initially was reported, was because he had patients who were soldiers returning from war who had suffered severe post-traumatic stress syndrome, and he feared having to face the same situation.
This initial statement should have been enough to force the nation to have a moment of reckoning with our collective conscience: the U.S. has sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to a war zone based on entirely false pretenses: The September 11 events, WMD's, Liberation, Democracy, Taliban, Women's Freedom. When these young soldiers return, if their physical selves are at all intact, their psychic selves are much less so. This is a--very late--moment where we should be asking ourselves how we can possibly live with our deliberate approval of the destruction of the psychic fabric-the deterioration of the emotional, physical, social, interpersonal capacities--of so many members of the next generation.
Instead, the nation's presses ran the tape on mass murderers: loner, psychically unhinged (after all, he was a psychiatrist), foreigner (child of Palestinian immigrants), outcast (pick your weapon: again, child of Palestinian immigrants. Or someone who wanted to escape his obligation to the army), and of course, initially, they (down)played the Muslim card-but they worked hard to include it in the framing of the tragedy. From Thursday afternoon, when it was first reported in the New York Times-to Friday morning, the story of Nadal Hasan went from "an Army Major who lists no religious affilation on his records," to "the child of Palestinian immigrants who was a devout Muslim." By Friday evening: he was someone who offered prayers at the local mosque, surreptitiously intercepted his neighbor's internet, and someone who was filmed on a "security camera" (somehow linking his presence to illegal activity). And what did CNN find on the camera? Someone who wore "traditional Muslim garb of a long white robe and head covering (clearly the camera was warranted). How could this happen in America? Someone who wore long Muslim robes was allowed to be the U.S. Army no less. And yet, no one with whom our sterling journalists spoke, could Nadal Hasan's religious affiliation to his actions.
As these intrepid reporters trolled the Net to find some other salacious detail, they discovered someone with the same name to have posted a note on a blog in defense of suicide bombings as heroic acts. So much for waiting until you have your facts.
To listen to the reports was like watching a deer be hunted. As Hasan moved to his targeted position between the cross-hairs, the media got ready to pull the trigger: Muslim! In less than 24 hours, NPR managed to find a reporter who spoke with another psychiatrist who mentioned "collective worries" about Hasan: he was lazy, he had been counseled numerous times, he was always late for work. And finally, the piece de la resistance: he was supposed to give a medical lecture, and instead launched into a disquisition about Islam-which was described as "his own beliefs," rather than about Islam per se: he mentioned penalties that non-believers should suffer: decapitation, oil poured down one's throat. And another Muslim psychiatrist (the good Muslim, clearly) challenged him publicly as espousing rare views of Islam that other good Muslims don't share...
If we take seriously that these actions stem from Nadal Hasan's religious commitments, then what we should be doing (without condoning Nadal Hasan's actions) --what we are unable to do--is to have a conversation about what a difficult situation he faced: a man's nation is war with his religion. And he was required to go to war against some part of himself-not because Muslims are crazy, lazy, and irresponsible, but because that is how this war has been framed: "America is at war with Islam." Many of us get to avoid this contradiction because we have made decisions-or have means and resources--that allow us to step out of harm's way. Nadal Hasan did not.
Or: we could have been more responsible in our thinking: Maj. Nadal Hasan was facing an existential crisis of already knowing his fate: go to war and return as a shell of your former self. Be met in the way that an Army veteran in these times inevitably is: with an absence of gratitude, support services, or hope for the future. Live the rest of your life as a psychically traumatized human being, whose presence all too vividly-and embarrassingly-- reminds us of the huge costs a significant number of Americans must bear. And do so, while we in the United States avoid reckoning with our own consciences, our bad faith that put these men and women-Americans, soldiers, Muslims, Christians, Jews, mothers, sons, partners-into harm's way without a second thought of the tragic consequences that they-and their families, friends, neighbors-that we, will have to bear for decades to come.
That is the conversation we have yet to have.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Falguni Sheth
Falguni A. Sheth is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Political Theory at Hampshire College. She is the author of Toward a Political Philosophy of Race (SUNY, 2009), explores state-driven racial divisions and persecution. She was formerly an Immigrant Rights Commissioner of San Francisco.
The news that a gunman who killed 12 people and injured 31 at the Ft. Hood Army Base in Texas sent me scurrying in anxiety for more information. In addition to the tragic deaths of so many servicemen and women, my fear was that it would be someone who was not Anglo, and even worse, would be an immigrant, or the possibly the worst outcome in the post 9/11 climate-that the shooter was somehow connected to being Muslim.
Indeed, my worst fears were borne out in very little time: Malik Nidal Hasan was a Major in the U.S. Army, serving as a psychiatrist. Set to deploy soon to Iraq or Afghanistan, Maj. Hasan was very upset. His concern, it was initially was reported, was because he had patients who were soldiers returning from war who had suffered severe post-traumatic stress syndrome, and he feared having to face the same situation.
This initial statement should have been enough to force the nation to have a moment of reckoning with our collective conscience: the U.S. has sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to a war zone based on entirely false pretenses: The September 11 events, WMD's, Liberation, Democracy, Taliban, Women's Freedom. When these young soldiers return, if their physical selves are at all intact, their psychic selves are much less so. This is a--very late--moment where we should be asking ourselves how we can possibly live with our deliberate approval of the destruction of the psychic fabric-the deterioration of the emotional, physical, social, interpersonal capacities--of so many members of the next generation.
Instead, the nation's presses ran the tape on mass murderers: loner, psychically unhinged (after all, he was a psychiatrist), foreigner (child of Palestinian immigrants), outcast (pick your weapon: again, child of Palestinian immigrants. Or someone who wanted to escape his obligation to the army), and of course, initially, they (down)played the Muslim card-but they worked hard to include it in the framing of the tragedy. From Thursday afternoon, when it was first reported in the New York Times-to Friday morning, the story of Nadal Hasan went from "an Army Major who lists no religious affilation on his records," to "the child of Palestinian immigrants who was a devout Muslim." By Friday evening: he was someone who offered prayers at the local mosque, surreptitiously intercepted his neighbor's internet, and someone who was filmed on a "security camera" (somehow linking his presence to illegal activity). And what did CNN find on the camera? Someone who wore "traditional Muslim garb of a long white robe and head covering (clearly the camera was warranted). How could this happen in America? Someone who wore long Muslim robes was allowed to be the U.S. Army no less. And yet, no one with whom our sterling journalists spoke, could Nadal Hasan's religious affiliation to his actions.
As these intrepid reporters trolled the Net to find some other salacious detail, they discovered someone with the same name to have posted a note on a blog in defense of suicide bombings as heroic acts. So much for waiting until you have your facts.
To listen to the reports was like watching a deer be hunted. As Hasan moved to his targeted position between the cross-hairs, the media got ready to pull the trigger: Muslim! In less than 24 hours, NPR managed to find a reporter who spoke with another psychiatrist who mentioned "collective worries" about Hasan: he was lazy, he had been counseled numerous times, he was always late for work. And finally, the piece de la resistance: he was supposed to give a medical lecture, and instead launched into a disquisition about Islam-which was described as "his own beliefs," rather than about Islam per se: he mentioned penalties that non-believers should suffer: decapitation, oil poured down one's throat. And another Muslim psychiatrist (the good Muslim, clearly) challenged him publicly as espousing rare views of Islam that other good Muslims don't share...
If we take seriously that these actions stem from Nadal Hasan's religious commitments, then what we should be doing (without condoning Nadal Hasan's actions) --what we are unable to do--is to have a conversation about what a difficult situation he faced: a man's nation is war with his religion. And he was required to go to war against some part of himself-not because Muslims are crazy, lazy, and irresponsible, but because that is how this war has been framed: "America is at war with Islam." Many of us get to avoid this contradiction because we have made decisions-or have means and resources--that allow us to step out of harm's way. Nadal Hasan did not.
Or: we could have been more responsible in our thinking: Maj. Nadal Hasan was facing an existential crisis of already knowing his fate: go to war and return as a shell of your former self. Be met in the way that an Army veteran in these times inevitably is: with an absence of gratitude, support services, or hope for the future. Live the rest of your life as a psychically traumatized human being, whose presence all too vividly-and embarrassingly-- reminds us of the huge costs a significant number of Americans must bear. And do so, while we in the United States avoid reckoning with our own consciences, our bad faith that put these men and women-Americans, soldiers, Muslims, Christians, Jews, mothers, sons, partners-into harm's way without a second thought of the tragic consequences that they-and their families, friends, neighbors-that we, will have to bear for decades to come.
That is the conversation we have yet to have.
Falguni Sheth
Falguni A. Sheth is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Political Theory at Hampshire College. She is the author of Toward a Political Philosophy of Race (SUNY, 2009), explores state-driven racial divisions and persecution. She was formerly an Immigrant Rights Commissioner of San Francisco.
The news that a gunman who killed 12 people and injured 31 at the Ft. Hood Army Base in Texas sent me scurrying in anxiety for more information. In addition to the tragic deaths of so many servicemen and women, my fear was that it would be someone who was not Anglo, and even worse, would be an immigrant, or the possibly the worst outcome in the post 9/11 climate-that the shooter was somehow connected to being Muslim.
Indeed, my worst fears were borne out in very little time: Malik Nidal Hasan was a Major in the U.S. Army, serving as a psychiatrist. Set to deploy soon to Iraq or Afghanistan, Maj. Hasan was very upset. His concern, it was initially was reported, was because he had patients who were soldiers returning from war who had suffered severe post-traumatic stress syndrome, and he feared having to face the same situation.
This initial statement should have been enough to force the nation to have a moment of reckoning with our collective conscience: the U.S. has sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to a war zone based on entirely false pretenses: The September 11 events, WMD's, Liberation, Democracy, Taliban, Women's Freedom. When these young soldiers return, if their physical selves are at all intact, their psychic selves are much less so. This is a--very late--moment where we should be asking ourselves how we can possibly live with our deliberate approval of the destruction of the psychic fabric-the deterioration of the emotional, physical, social, interpersonal capacities--of so many members of the next generation.
Instead, the nation's presses ran the tape on mass murderers: loner, psychically unhinged (after all, he was a psychiatrist), foreigner (child of Palestinian immigrants), outcast (pick your weapon: again, child of Palestinian immigrants. Or someone who wanted to escape his obligation to the army), and of course, initially, they (down)played the Muslim card-but they worked hard to include it in the framing of the tragedy. From Thursday afternoon, when it was first reported in the New York Times-to Friday morning, the story of Nadal Hasan went from "an Army Major who lists no religious affilation on his records," to "the child of Palestinian immigrants who was a devout Muslim." By Friday evening: he was someone who offered prayers at the local mosque, surreptitiously intercepted his neighbor's internet, and someone who was filmed on a "security camera" (somehow linking his presence to illegal activity). And what did CNN find on the camera? Someone who wore "traditional Muslim garb of a long white robe and head covering (clearly the camera was warranted). How could this happen in America? Someone who wore long Muslim robes was allowed to be the U.S. Army no less. And yet, no one with whom our sterling journalists spoke, could Nadal Hasan's religious affiliation to his actions.
As these intrepid reporters trolled the Net to find some other salacious detail, they discovered someone with the same name to have posted a note on a blog in defense of suicide bombings as heroic acts. So much for waiting until you have your facts.
To listen to the reports was like watching a deer be hunted. As Hasan moved to his targeted position between the cross-hairs, the media got ready to pull the trigger: Muslim! In less than 24 hours, NPR managed to find a reporter who spoke with another psychiatrist who mentioned "collective worries" about Hasan: he was lazy, he had been counseled numerous times, he was always late for work. And finally, the piece de la resistance: he was supposed to give a medical lecture, and instead launched into a disquisition about Islam-which was described as "his own beliefs," rather than about Islam per se: he mentioned penalties that non-believers should suffer: decapitation, oil poured down one's throat. And another Muslim psychiatrist (the good Muslim, clearly) challenged him publicly as espousing rare views of Islam that other good Muslims don't share...
If we take seriously that these actions stem from Nadal Hasan's religious commitments, then what we should be doing (without condoning Nadal Hasan's actions) --what we are unable to do--is to have a conversation about what a difficult situation he faced: a man's nation is war with his religion. And he was required to go to war against some part of himself-not because Muslims are crazy, lazy, and irresponsible, but because that is how this war has been framed: "America is at war with Islam." Many of us get to avoid this contradiction because we have made decisions-or have means and resources--that allow us to step out of harm's way. Nadal Hasan did not.
Or: we could have been more responsible in our thinking: Maj. Nadal Hasan was facing an existential crisis of already knowing his fate: go to war and return as a shell of your former self. Be met in the way that an Army veteran in these times inevitably is: with an absence of gratitude, support services, or hope for the future. Live the rest of your life as a psychically traumatized human being, whose presence all too vividly-and embarrassingly-- reminds us of the huge costs a significant number of Americans must bear. And do so, while we in the United States avoid reckoning with our own consciences, our bad faith that put these men and women-Americans, soldiers, Muslims, Christians, Jews, mothers, sons, partners-into harm's way without a second thought of the tragic consequences that they-and their families, friends, neighbors-that we, will have to bear for decades to come.
That is the conversation we have yet to have.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.