SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Karzai Did the Deals That Made Him a Winner Anyway
Nov 02, 2009
The scene was evocative, Abdullah Abdullah making
his stand against corruption in front of hundreds of grizzled old
warriors and tribal chiefs. The setting was the huge tent built for the
loya jirga
after the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, an apt symbol of a new
beginning as the former comrade of the great Mujaheddin commander Ahmed
Shah Masood threw down a gauntlet for a possible future challenge to Hamid Karzai for the leadership of Afghanistan.
Despite
all the criticism heaped on Mr Karzai for fraud in the election and for
all the surprisingly strong showing of Mr Abdullah, there was always
going to be one winner in this race, Hamid Karzai.
The demographics of Afghanistan
mean that Mr Karzai, from the majority Pashtun population, could not be
beaten by a man who is of mixed Pashtun and Tajik parentage, but draws
his support overwhelmingly from Tajiks. Besides, deals done by Mr
Karzai had ensured that he would have got the other significant
minority votes, the Uzbeks and Hazaras.
It is one of the ironies of the electoral
mess that Mr Karzai would probably have won in the first round of the
polls even without his supporters engaging in massive and blatant
ballot stuffing. To his surprise and anger he was penalised for the
fraud and forced to run a second round.
The
incumbent president and his followers, and indeed many Afghans who do
not directly support him blame the West for putting them through a
second electoral process.
Around $300m (PS180m) has been spent so far on the elections. And then there are the lives of soldiers,
civilians and officials lost in attacks by the Taliban who vowed to
disrupt the polls. Further costs, human and material, to get Mr Karzai
to his 50 per cent of votes officially needed for victory would cause
an international outcry. Many UN
staff, who have seen seven of their colleagues murdered - five last
week in Kabul - in the course of election work, are close to revolt
against taking part in such an empty exercise.
The
likely course now is election officials will take the matter to the
supreme court which could waive the rules demanding a second round.
Western officials insist that Mr Karzai will in future be pressurised
to carry out reforms and take a firmer stand against corruption. But
they will have to continue dealing with Hamid Karzai. There is no one
else around.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Independent
The scene was evocative, Abdullah Abdullah making
his stand against corruption in front of hundreds of grizzled old
warriors and tribal chiefs. The setting was the huge tent built for the
loya jirga
after the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, an apt symbol of a new
beginning as the former comrade of the great Mujaheddin commander Ahmed
Shah Masood threw down a gauntlet for a possible future challenge to Hamid Karzai for the leadership of Afghanistan.
Despite
all the criticism heaped on Mr Karzai for fraud in the election and for
all the surprisingly strong showing of Mr Abdullah, there was always
going to be one winner in this race, Hamid Karzai.
The demographics of Afghanistan
mean that Mr Karzai, from the majority Pashtun population, could not be
beaten by a man who is of mixed Pashtun and Tajik parentage, but draws
his support overwhelmingly from Tajiks. Besides, deals done by Mr
Karzai had ensured that he would have got the other significant
minority votes, the Uzbeks and Hazaras.
It is one of the ironies of the electoral
mess that Mr Karzai would probably have won in the first round of the
polls even without his supporters engaging in massive and blatant
ballot stuffing. To his surprise and anger he was penalised for the
fraud and forced to run a second round.
The
incumbent president and his followers, and indeed many Afghans who do
not directly support him blame the West for putting them through a
second electoral process.
Around $300m (PS180m) has been spent so far on the elections. And then there are the lives of soldiers,
civilians and officials lost in attacks by the Taliban who vowed to
disrupt the polls. Further costs, human and material, to get Mr Karzai
to his 50 per cent of votes officially needed for victory would cause
an international outcry. Many UN
staff, who have seen seven of their colleagues murdered - five last
week in Kabul - in the course of election work, are close to revolt
against taking part in such an empty exercise.
The
likely course now is election officials will take the matter to the
supreme court which could waive the rules demanding a second round.
Western officials insist that Mr Karzai will in future be pressurised
to carry out reforms and take a firmer stand against corruption. But
they will have to continue dealing with Hamid Karzai. There is no one
else around.
The scene was evocative, Abdullah Abdullah making
his stand against corruption in front of hundreds of grizzled old
warriors and tribal chiefs. The setting was the huge tent built for the
loya jirga
after the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, an apt symbol of a new
beginning as the former comrade of the great Mujaheddin commander Ahmed
Shah Masood threw down a gauntlet for a possible future challenge to Hamid Karzai for the leadership of Afghanistan.
Despite
all the criticism heaped on Mr Karzai for fraud in the election and for
all the surprisingly strong showing of Mr Abdullah, there was always
going to be one winner in this race, Hamid Karzai.
The demographics of Afghanistan
mean that Mr Karzai, from the majority Pashtun population, could not be
beaten by a man who is of mixed Pashtun and Tajik parentage, but draws
his support overwhelmingly from Tajiks. Besides, deals done by Mr
Karzai had ensured that he would have got the other significant
minority votes, the Uzbeks and Hazaras.
It is one of the ironies of the electoral
mess that Mr Karzai would probably have won in the first round of the
polls even without his supporters engaging in massive and blatant
ballot stuffing. To his surprise and anger he was penalised for the
fraud and forced to run a second round.
The
incumbent president and his followers, and indeed many Afghans who do
not directly support him blame the West for putting them through a
second electoral process.
Around $300m (PS180m) has been spent so far on the elections. And then there are the lives of soldiers,
civilians and officials lost in attacks by the Taliban who vowed to
disrupt the polls. Further costs, human and material, to get Mr Karzai
to his 50 per cent of votes officially needed for victory would cause
an international outcry. Many UN
staff, who have seen seven of their colleagues murdered - five last
week in Kabul - in the course of election work, are close to revolt
against taking part in such an empty exercise.
The
likely course now is election officials will take the matter to the
supreme court which could waive the rules demanding a second round.
Western officials insist that Mr Karzai will in future be pressurised
to carry out reforms and take a firmer stand against corruption. But
they will have to continue dealing with Hamid Karzai. There is no one
else around.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.