Why Arianna Doesn't Get It
I admire Arianna Huffington. She is a strong, bold voice in our media
firmament. But in the last few days, she has advanced an idea which, in
my view, is wrong. She is urging Vice President Biden to resign if the
Obama administration ignores his proposal to concentrate on counter-terrorist operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Arianna argues that by doing so, Biden would be following in the
hallowed tradition of US officials, like Elliot Richardson and Cyrus
Vance, who resigned for reasons of principle. Richardson resigned after
refusing to fire Archibald Cox; he did so to uphold the rule of law and
to prevent the presidential abuse of power. Cyrus Vance resigned to
protest the attempted military rescue of American hostages in Iran,
which he believed jeopardized diplomatic and peaceful efforts to win
their release.
But the flaw in Arianna's reasoning is to equate Biden's advocacy of
counterterrorism with principled stances on law and diplomacy. While
Biden has been an important voice against escalation inside the
administration, his proposal itself is questionable; it advances the
doctrine of preventive military action that would violate
the sovereignty of an American ally and that in the past has resulted
in
the death of innocent citizens. By any reasonable standard, Biden's
position is a violation of international law because the United States
is not under threat of an imminent attack from extremists in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and because the past eight years have made
clear there are reasonable legal
alternatives to protecting American lives in the form of intelligence
and police actions that do not put innocent civilian life at risk.
That an otherwise principled figure like Arianna would, with such
fervor, propose this idea is an indication of how the war on terror has damaged and distorted our society and politics.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I admire Arianna Huffington. She is a strong, bold voice in our media
firmament. But in the last few days, she has advanced an idea which, in
my view, is wrong. She is urging Vice President Biden to resign if the
Obama administration ignores his proposal to concentrate on counter-terrorist operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Arianna argues that by doing so, Biden would be following in the
hallowed tradition of US officials, like Elliot Richardson and Cyrus
Vance, who resigned for reasons of principle. Richardson resigned after
refusing to fire Archibald Cox; he did so to uphold the rule of law and
to prevent the presidential abuse of power. Cyrus Vance resigned to
protest the attempted military rescue of American hostages in Iran,
which he believed jeopardized diplomatic and peaceful efforts to win
their release.
But the flaw in Arianna's reasoning is to equate Biden's advocacy of
counterterrorism with principled stances on law and diplomacy. While
Biden has been an important voice against escalation inside the
administration, his proposal itself is questionable; it advances the
doctrine of preventive military action that would violate
the sovereignty of an American ally and that in the past has resulted
in
the death of innocent citizens. By any reasonable standard, Biden's
position is a violation of international law because the United States
is not under threat of an imminent attack from extremists in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and because the past eight years have made
clear there are reasonable legal
alternatives to protecting American lives in the form of intelligence
and police actions that do not put innocent civilian life at risk.
That an otherwise principled figure like Arianna would, with such
fervor, propose this idea is an indication of how the war on terror has damaged and distorted our society and politics.
I admire Arianna Huffington. She is a strong, bold voice in our media
firmament. But in the last few days, she has advanced an idea which, in
my view, is wrong. She is urging Vice President Biden to resign if the
Obama administration ignores his proposal to concentrate on counter-terrorist operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Arianna argues that by doing so, Biden would be following in the
hallowed tradition of US officials, like Elliot Richardson and Cyrus
Vance, who resigned for reasons of principle. Richardson resigned after
refusing to fire Archibald Cox; he did so to uphold the rule of law and
to prevent the presidential abuse of power. Cyrus Vance resigned to
protest the attempted military rescue of American hostages in Iran,
which he believed jeopardized diplomatic and peaceful efforts to win
their release.
But the flaw in Arianna's reasoning is to equate Biden's advocacy of
counterterrorism with principled stances on law and diplomacy. While
Biden has been an important voice against escalation inside the
administration, his proposal itself is questionable; it advances the
doctrine of preventive military action that would violate
the sovereignty of an American ally and that in the past has resulted
in
the death of innocent citizens. By any reasonable standard, Biden's
position is a violation of international law because the United States
is not under threat of an imminent attack from extremists in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and because the past eight years have made
clear there are reasonable legal
alternatives to protecting American lives in the form of intelligence
and police actions that do not put innocent civilian life at risk.
That an otherwise principled figure like Arianna would, with such
fervor, propose this idea is an indication of how the war on terror has damaged and distorted our society and politics.