SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The High Human Cost of Unsafe Food
Oct 07, 2009
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.