SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.
I think we need a whole lot more public outrage about unsafe food. Maybe the recent front-page articles in the Washington Post and New York Times will do the trick.
Both tell tragic stories of women who developed hemolytic uremia syndrome in response to eating a food contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.
Both reveal the appalling physical and monetary cost of these
illnesses. Recall: we also do not have an effective and affordable
health care system.
To me, the most chilling part of the Times investigation
had to do with the lack of testing for dangerous pathogens. No meat
packing company wants to test. Why not? They know the animals coming
into the plant are contaminated. They know that tests would come up
positive. They know that if they find pathogens, they have to recall
the meat.
It's obvious why meat is contaminated. The making of hamburger is enough to put anyone off, as the letters to today's Times attest. In my book, Safe Food, I discuss a study demonstrating that one pound of commercial hamburger could contain meat from more than 400 cattle. The Times' article
takes such facts to a personal level. The 22-year-old woman who ate the
tainted hamburger is paralyzed from the waist down and likely never to
walk again.
Read these articles and you will understand that meat companies
will not do what is needed to produce safe food unless they are forced
to.
And it's not just hamburger that causes problems. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a new report out
on the ten foods that cause the most cases of foodborne illness in
America. Hamburger isn't even on the list. Instead, it's leafy greens,
eggs, tuna, oysters, potatoes, cheese, ice cream, tomatoes, sprouts,
and berries.
So how come Congress isn't forcing all food producers
to produce safe food? Could it be because there isn't enough public
outrage to counteract industry pressures and make Congress act?
Bill Marler, who represents both of the victims profiled in those articles, is begging Congress to put him out of business.
His message is clear: get busy and pass meaningful food safety legislation, right now, before it is too late.
I'm hoping these articles and the CSPI report will be seen by
senatorial staff who will urge their bosses to support the House bill
passed last spring.
Maybe we need hundreds of thousands of people to deluge Congress with appeals to act on food safety, now.
You would like to do this but don't know how? Easy. Find your own representatives online on the House site and your Senator just as easily. The e-mail addresses are right there waiting to be used.