Guarding the Classroom

Thou hast most traitorously corrupted the youth of the realm in erecting a grammar school . . . .
- Wm. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Act IV

Vigilance.
Without it who knows what sorts of insidious messages would slip into
the curriculum of public schools throughout the country.

The
prospect of President Obama encouraging students to study and stay in
school terrified many on the right who believed that if their children
learn to think for themselves they may eschew the likes of Rush
Limbaugh and his ilk and even, in some cases, their parents. They
feared that the president, being both articulate and intelligent would,
in the brief time allotted, emulate the Pied Piper and lead children
from the classroom into the muddy waters of socialism or fascism,
depending on which commentator was believed.

Florida's Republican Party chairman, Jim Greer,
gave voice to the terrified parents. "As the father of four children, I
am absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread
President Obama's socialist ideology. The idea that school children
across our nation will be forced to watch the President justify his
plans for government-run health care, banks, and automobile companies,
increasing taxes on those who create jobs, and racking up more debt
than any other President, is not only infuriating, but goes against
beliefs of the majority of Americans, while bypassing American parents
through an invasive abuse of power. . . . The address scheduled for
September 8, 2009, does not allow for healthy debate on the President's
agenda, but rather obligates the youngest children in our public school
system to agree with our President's initiatives or be ostracized by
their teachers and classmates. . . .The Democrats have clearly lost the
battle to maintain control of the message this summer, so now that
school is back in session, President Obama has turned to American's
children to spread his liberal lies, indoctrinating American's youngest
children before they have a chance to decide for themselves." (In
fairness to Mr. Greer it must be pointed out that he made his comments
when he didn't know what he was talking about. When he got around to
reading the speech he said he planned to watch it.)

Mark
Steyn of Canada, a political commentator and classroom defender, told
Rush Limbaugh that in wanting to speak to children in school Mr. Obama
was like North Korean leader Kim Jong-il or Saddam Hussein in that he
was creating a cult of personality albeit on a smaller scale than those
two men had done. In case the Greer and Steyn messages failed to
resonate with those concerned with protecting the classroom from the
President, Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota joined the defenders.

According to Politico
the governor told the Minneapolis Star Tribune the speech could be
disruptive. He worried not only about content, which was adequately
addressed by Mr. Greer, but motive. The lesson plan sent to schools
encouraged the students to write to the president. It first suggested
that students write letters saying how they could help the president
but reacting to criticism, the plan was amended to suggest the students
write letters about what the President's goals should be. Either is a
subtle form of indoctrination and, as Mr. Steyn told Mr. Limbaugh,
"slightly unhealthy". The Governor told a radio show that: "There are
going to be questions about-well, what are they going to do with those
names and is that for the purpose of a mailing list?" The governor has
put his finger on a very significant point. Although it was possible
that in 18 minutes Mr. Obama would not cover all the topics anticipated
by Mr. Greer, if the students write the President, Mr. Pawlenty
believes the government will compile a list of names of students that
it can later contact to further propagandize them. The president's
speech was not the only perceived threat to the classroom to rear its
head in September.

In California Governor Schwarzenegger has
been given a piece of legislation to sign that would create a "day of
recognition" for former San Francisco Board of Supervisors member,
Harvey Milk, who was assassinated in 1977. Under California law a "day
of recognition" means that schools "conduct suitable commemorative
exercises." Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, described
all the problems inherent in allowing such a bill to become law saying
that: "The bill is so broad it could encompass all kinds of things.
Remembering the life of Harvey Milk could allow for gay pride parades
on campus or mock gay weddings or cross-dressing. There is no
prohibition of what the bill calls 'suitable commemorative exercises.'
The sky's the limit."

Public education has been seriously
threatened with the start of the new school year. We can only be
grateful for the likes of Messrs. Greer, Pawlenty and Thomasson who are
attempting to ensure that ideas won't find their ways into our
classrooms.