

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Last night, the so-called
"gang of six" -- three Republican and three Democratic senators on the
Senate Finance Committee -- met by conference call and, according to
Senator Max Baucus, the committee's chair, reaffirmed their commitment
"toward a bipartisan health-care reform bill" (read: less coverage and
no public insurance option). The Washington Post reports that
the senators shared tales from their home states, where some have been
besieged by protesters angry about a potential government takeover of
the nation's health care system.
It's come down to these six senators. The House has reported a bill
as has another Senate committee, but all eyes are fixed on Senate
Finance -- and on these three Dems and three Republicans, in
particular. But who, exactly, anointed these six to decide the fate of
the nation's health care?
I don't get it. Of the three Republicans in the gang, the senior
senator is Charles Grassley. In recent weeks, Grassley has refused to
debunk the rumor that the House's health-care bill will spawn "death
panels," empowered to decide whether the sick and old get to live or
die. At an Iowa town meeting last Tuesday Grassley called the president
and Speaker Nancy Pelosi "intellectually dishonest" for claiming the
opposite. On Thursday Grassley told the Washington Post that
Congress should scale back its efforts to overhaul health care in the
wake of intense anger at town hall meetings. But -- wait -- the anger
is largely about distortions such as the "death panels" that Grassley
refuses to debunk.
This week on Fox News Grassley termed the House bill "the Pelosi
Bill," and called it "a government takeover of heath care, exploding
the deficit because it's not paid for and it's got high taxes in it."
I really don't get it. We have a Democratic president in the White
House. Democrats control sixty votes in the Senate, enough to overcome
a filibuster. It is possible to pass health care legislation through
the Senate with 51 votes (that's what George W. Bush did with his tax
cut plan). Democrats control the House. The Speaker of the House, Nancy
Pelosi, is a tough lady. She has said there will be no health care
reform bill without a public option.
So why does the fate of health care rest in Grassley's hands?
It's not even as if the gang represents America. The three Dems on
the gang are from Montana, New Mexico, and North Dakota -- states that
together account for just over 1 percent of Americans. The three
Republicans are from Maine, Wyoming, and Iowa, which together account
for 1.6 percent of the American population.
So, I repeat: Why has it come down to these six? Who anointed them?
Apparently, the White House. At least that's what I'm repeatedly being
told by sources both on the Hill and in the administration. "The
Finance Committee is where the action is. They'll tee-up the final
bill," says someone who should know.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last night, the so-called
"gang of six" -- three Republican and three Democratic senators on the
Senate Finance Committee -- met by conference call and, according to
Senator Max Baucus, the committee's chair, reaffirmed their commitment
"toward a bipartisan health-care reform bill" (read: less coverage and
no public insurance option). The Washington Post reports that
the senators shared tales from their home states, where some have been
besieged by protesters angry about a potential government takeover of
the nation's health care system.
It's come down to these six senators. The House has reported a bill
as has another Senate committee, but all eyes are fixed on Senate
Finance -- and on these three Dems and three Republicans, in
particular. But who, exactly, anointed these six to decide the fate of
the nation's health care?
I don't get it. Of the three Republicans in the gang, the senior
senator is Charles Grassley. In recent weeks, Grassley has refused to
debunk the rumor that the House's health-care bill will spawn "death
panels," empowered to decide whether the sick and old get to live or
die. At an Iowa town meeting last Tuesday Grassley called the president
and Speaker Nancy Pelosi "intellectually dishonest" for claiming the
opposite. On Thursday Grassley told the Washington Post that
Congress should scale back its efforts to overhaul health care in the
wake of intense anger at town hall meetings. But -- wait -- the anger
is largely about distortions such as the "death panels" that Grassley
refuses to debunk.
This week on Fox News Grassley termed the House bill "the Pelosi
Bill," and called it "a government takeover of heath care, exploding
the deficit because it's not paid for and it's got high taxes in it."
I really don't get it. We have a Democratic president in the White
House. Democrats control sixty votes in the Senate, enough to overcome
a filibuster. It is possible to pass health care legislation through
the Senate with 51 votes (that's what George W. Bush did with his tax
cut plan). Democrats control the House. The Speaker of the House, Nancy
Pelosi, is a tough lady. She has said there will be no health care
reform bill without a public option.
So why does the fate of health care rest in Grassley's hands?
It's not even as if the gang represents America. The three Dems on
the gang are from Montana, New Mexico, and North Dakota -- states that
together account for just over 1 percent of Americans. The three
Republicans are from Maine, Wyoming, and Iowa, which together account
for 1.6 percent of the American population.
So, I repeat: Why has it come down to these six? Who anointed them?
Apparently, the White House. At least that's what I'm repeatedly being
told by sources both on the Hill and in the administration. "The
Finance Committee is where the action is. They'll tee-up the final
bill," says someone who should know.
Last night, the so-called
"gang of six" -- three Republican and three Democratic senators on the
Senate Finance Committee -- met by conference call and, according to
Senator Max Baucus, the committee's chair, reaffirmed their commitment
"toward a bipartisan health-care reform bill" (read: less coverage and
no public insurance option). The Washington Post reports that
the senators shared tales from their home states, where some have been
besieged by protesters angry about a potential government takeover of
the nation's health care system.
It's come down to these six senators. The House has reported a bill
as has another Senate committee, but all eyes are fixed on Senate
Finance -- and on these three Dems and three Republicans, in
particular. But who, exactly, anointed these six to decide the fate of
the nation's health care?
I don't get it. Of the three Republicans in the gang, the senior
senator is Charles Grassley. In recent weeks, Grassley has refused to
debunk the rumor that the House's health-care bill will spawn "death
panels," empowered to decide whether the sick and old get to live or
die. At an Iowa town meeting last Tuesday Grassley called the president
and Speaker Nancy Pelosi "intellectually dishonest" for claiming the
opposite. On Thursday Grassley told the Washington Post that
Congress should scale back its efforts to overhaul health care in the
wake of intense anger at town hall meetings. But -- wait -- the anger
is largely about distortions such as the "death panels" that Grassley
refuses to debunk.
This week on Fox News Grassley termed the House bill "the Pelosi
Bill," and called it "a government takeover of heath care, exploding
the deficit because it's not paid for and it's got high taxes in it."
I really don't get it. We have a Democratic president in the White
House. Democrats control sixty votes in the Senate, enough to overcome
a filibuster. It is possible to pass health care legislation through
the Senate with 51 votes (that's what George W. Bush did with his tax
cut plan). Democrats control the House. The Speaker of the House, Nancy
Pelosi, is a tough lady. She has said there will be no health care
reform bill without a public option.
So why does the fate of health care rest in Grassley's hands?
It's not even as if the gang represents America. The three Dems on
the gang are from Montana, New Mexico, and North Dakota -- states that
together account for just over 1 percent of Americans. The three
Republicans are from Maine, Wyoming, and Iowa, which together account
for 1.6 percent of the American population.
So, I repeat: Why has it come down to these six? Who anointed them?
Apparently, the White House. At least that's what I'm repeatedly being
told by sources both on the Hill and in the administration. "The
Finance Committee is where the action is. They'll tee-up the final
bill," says someone who should know.