SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Did a CID-Gallup poll last week indicate that a plurality of Hondurans
support the military coup against democratically elected President
Zelaya? Yes, according to the Washington Post [July
9], the Wall Street Journal [July
10], the Christian Science Monitor [July
11], and Reuters [July
9], which all reported that the poll showed 41% in favor of the
coup, with only 28% opposed.
But in fact the poll showed that 46% - a plurality - were *opposed* to
the coup, according to the New York Times[July
10], the Associated Press [July
11] - and the
president of CID-Gallup, in an interview with Voice of
America on July 9.
As of this writing - Sunday evening, 5:30 pm Eastern time - none of
the outlets which reported the poll incorrectly had corrected their
earlier, inaccurate, reports.
In reporting the poll incorrectly, the Post, the
Journal, the Monitor, and Reuters gave the
impression that more Hondurans supported the coup than opposed it,
suggesting that this meant trouble for the international coalition
pressing for the restoration of President Zelaya - which includes
Costa Rican President Arias and Organization of American States
Secretary-General Insulza, as well as the Obama Administration.
Of course, even if a poll had showed a plurality in favor of the coup,
that would not legitimize the coup. But the opinion of the population,
even if difficult to discern in the repression following the coup, is
without question a key fact in understanding the situation. To
misreport such a key fact is to substantially misinform. To fail to
correct such a mistake compounds the error.
The incorrect report of the poll appears to have originated in the
Honduran La Prensa. But the U.S. press should have checked
before simply repeating what was in La Prensa, particularly
on such an important fact, particularly because the result was
counterintuitive.
But perhaps the result was not counterintuitive for these press
outlets, and that may suggest a deeper problem - the U.S. press is out
of touch with the majority of the population in Honduras, and
therefore credulous to results which misreport Honduran public opinion
as being much more similar than it is to the opinions of Honduran
elites.
To ask for corrections, you can contact the Washington Post
here; the Christian
Science Monitor here
; and the Wall Street Journal here.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Did a CID-Gallup poll last week indicate that a plurality of Hondurans
support the military coup against democratically elected President
Zelaya? Yes, according to the Washington Post [July
9], the Wall Street Journal [July
10], the Christian Science Monitor [July
11], and Reuters [July
9], which all reported that the poll showed 41% in favor of the
coup, with only 28% opposed.
But in fact the poll showed that 46% - a plurality - were *opposed* to
the coup, according to the New York Times[July
10], the Associated Press [July
11] - and the
president of CID-Gallup, in an interview with Voice of
America on July 9.
As of this writing - Sunday evening, 5:30 pm Eastern time - none of
the outlets which reported the poll incorrectly had corrected their
earlier, inaccurate, reports.
In reporting the poll incorrectly, the Post, the
Journal, the Monitor, and Reuters gave the
impression that more Hondurans supported the coup than opposed it,
suggesting that this meant trouble for the international coalition
pressing for the restoration of President Zelaya - which includes
Costa Rican President Arias and Organization of American States
Secretary-General Insulza, as well as the Obama Administration.
Of course, even if a poll had showed a plurality in favor of the coup,
that would not legitimize the coup. But the opinion of the population,
even if difficult to discern in the repression following the coup, is
without question a key fact in understanding the situation. To
misreport such a key fact is to substantially misinform. To fail to
correct such a mistake compounds the error.
The incorrect report of the poll appears to have originated in the
Honduran La Prensa. But the U.S. press should have checked
before simply repeating what was in La Prensa, particularly
on such an important fact, particularly because the result was
counterintuitive.
But perhaps the result was not counterintuitive for these press
outlets, and that may suggest a deeper problem - the U.S. press is out
of touch with the majority of the population in Honduras, and
therefore credulous to results which misreport Honduran public opinion
as being much more similar than it is to the opinions of Honduran
elites.
To ask for corrections, you can contact the Washington Post
here; the Christian
Science Monitor here
; and the Wall Street Journal here.
Did a CID-Gallup poll last week indicate that a plurality of Hondurans
support the military coup against democratically elected President
Zelaya? Yes, according to the Washington Post [July
9], the Wall Street Journal [July
10], the Christian Science Monitor [July
11], and Reuters [July
9], which all reported that the poll showed 41% in favor of the
coup, with only 28% opposed.
But in fact the poll showed that 46% - a plurality - were *opposed* to
the coup, according to the New York Times[July
10], the Associated Press [July
11] - and the
president of CID-Gallup, in an interview with Voice of
America on July 9.
As of this writing - Sunday evening, 5:30 pm Eastern time - none of
the outlets which reported the poll incorrectly had corrected their
earlier, inaccurate, reports.
In reporting the poll incorrectly, the Post, the
Journal, the Monitor, and Reuters gave the
impression that more Hondurans supported the coup than opposed it,
suggesting that this meant trouble for the international coalition
pressing for the restoration of President Zelaya - which includes
Costa Rican President Arias and Organization of American States
Secretary-General Insulza, as well as the Obama Administration.
Of course, even if a poll had showed a plurality in favor of the coup,
that would not legitimize the coup. But the opinion of the population,
even if difficult to discern in the repression following the coup, is
without question a key fact in understanding the situation. To
misreport such a key fact is to substantially misinform. To fail to
correct such a mistake compounds the error.
The incorrect report of the poll appears to have originated in the
Honduran La Prensa. But the U.S. press should have checked
before simply repeating what was in La Prensa, particularly
on such an important fact, particularly because the result was
counterintuitive.
But perhaps the result was not counterintuitive for these press
outlets, and that may suggest a deeper problem - the U.S. press is out
of touch with the majority of the population in Honduras, and
therefore credulous to results which misreport Honduran public opinion
as being much more similar than it is to the opinions of Honduran
elites.
To ask for corrections, you can contact the Washington Post
here; the Christian
Science Monitor here
; and the Wall Street Journal here.