SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Bullying Congressional Progressives: Creepy, Revealing Quote from White House Staffer
Jane Hamsher details
the extremely aggressive tactics the White House and House leadership
used to coerce liberal environmentalist members to vote for the
cap-and-trade bill despite their belief that it helped polluters more
than it did anything else (and remember their ability to do that the
next time they claim that a bill they ostensibly support simply
couldn't pass because it lacked the necessary votes).
Jun 30, 2009
Jane Hamsher details
the extremely aggressive tactics the White House and House leadership
used to coerce liberal environmentalist members to vote for the
cap-and-trade bill despite their belief that it helped polluters more
than it did anything else (and remember their ability to do that the
next time they claim that a bill they ostensibly support simply
couldn't pass because it lacked the necessary votes). Jane quotes from
a Politico article reporting on White House anger towards Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, due to an impassioned floor speech he gave arguing that the bill was so industry-friendly that it would do more harm than good. That article contains this quote:
The
White House is smoking mad at Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who says
he's voting against the climate bill - despite the lobbying of the
entire First Family in the Oval Office last night.If the bill goes down, Obama won't forget Doggett's role, Democrats say.
It's "stunning that he would ignore the wishes not just of his president, but of his constituents and the country," said an administration official.
This
has been a emerging theme among both the White House and House
leadership: that members of Congress have an obligation to carry out
"the wishes of the President" (now, apparently, it's "stunning" when
they defy his dictates). That was the same subservient mentality
that led House Democrats who admitted they opposed the war supplemental
spending and/or the foreign bank bailout to nonetheless vote for the
bill: because they President favored it. The duty of Congress is not
to obey the wishes of the President.
Note, too, that the sort of bullying tactics
that were used for the war supplemental bill and now for the
cap-and-trade bill are only directed towards the House progressives who
want legislation to be less beholden to corporate donors; those tactics
are never invoked against Blue Dogs who play a vital role in impeding
progressive legislation and thus supply the perfect excuse for
Democratic leaders as to why such legislation does not pass (let's see
if these tactics are used against Blue Dogs who impede a public option
for health care, the repeal of DOMA and Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and
various issues relating to the closing of Guantanamo. Will we hear
condemnations from Rahm Emanuel's underlings about how stunning and
outrageous it is that they are defying the wishes of the President?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Salon
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, constitutional lawyer, commentator, author of three New York Times best-selling books on politics and law, and a former staff writer and editor at First Look media. His fifth and latest book is, "No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State," about the U.S. surveillance state and his experiences reporting on the Snowden documents around the world. Glenn's column was featured at Guardian US and Salon. His previous books include: "With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful," "Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics," and "A Tragic Legacy: How a Good vs. Evil Mentality Destroyed the Bush Presidency." He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, a George Polk Award, and was on The Guardian team that won the Pulitzer Prize for public interest journalism in 2014.
Jane Hamsher details
the extremely aggressive tactics the White House and House leadership
used to coerce liberal environmentalist members to vote for the
cap-and-trade bill despite their belief that it helped polluters more
than it did anything else (and remember their ability to do that the
next time they claim that a bill they ostensibly support simply
couldn't pass because it lacked the necessary votes). Jane quotes from
a Politico article reporting on White House anger towards Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, due to an impassioned floor speech he gave arguing that the bill was so industry-friendly that it would do more harm than good. That article contains this quote:
The
White House is smoking mad at Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who says
he's voting against the climate bill - despite the lobbying of the
entire First Family in the Oval Office last night.If the bill goes down, Obama won't forget Doggett's role, Democrats say.
It's "stunning that he would ignore the wishes not just of his president, but of his constituents and the country," said an administration official.
This
has been a emerging theme among both the White House and House
leadership: that members of Congress have an obligation to carry out
"the wishes of the President" (now, apparently, it's "stunning" when
they defy his dictates). That was the same subservient mentality
that led House Democrats who admitted they opposed the war supplemental
spending and/or the foreign bank bailout to nonetheless vote for the
bill: because they President favored it. The duty of Congress is not
to obey the wishes of the President.
Note, too, that the sort of bullying tactics
that were used for the war supplemental bill and now for the
cap-and-trade bill are only directed towards the House progressives who
want legislation to be less beholden to corporate donors; those tactics
are never invoked against Blue Dogs who play a vital role in impeding
progressive legislation and thus supply the perfect excuse for
Democratic leaders as to why such legislation does not pass (let's see
if these tactics are used against Blue Dogs who impede a public option
for health care, the repeal of DOMA and Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and
various issues relating to the closing of Guantanamo. Will we hear
condemnations from Rahm Emanuel's underlings about how stunning and
outrageous it is that they are defying the wishes of the President?
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, constitutional lawyer, commentator, author of three New York Times best-selling books on politics and law, and a former staff writer and editor at First Look media. His fifth and latest book is, "No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State," about the U.S. surveillance state and his experiences reporting on the Snowden documents around the world. Glenn's column was featured at Guardian US and Salon. His previous books include: "With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful," "Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics," and "A Tragic Legacy: How a Good vs. Evil Mentality Destroyed the Bush Presidency." He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, a George Polk Award, and was on The Guardian team that won the Pulitzer Prize for public interest journalism in 2014.
Jane Hamsher details
the extremely aggressive tactics the White House and House leadership
used to coerce liberal environmentalist members to vote for the
cap-and-trade bill despite their belief that it helped polluters more
than it did anything else (and remember their ability to do that the
next time they claim that a bill they ostensibly support simply
couldn't pass because it lacked the necessary votes). Jane quotes from
a Politico article reporting on White House anger towards Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, due to an impassioned floor speech he gave arguing that the bill was so industry-friendly that it would do more harm than good. That article contains this quote:
The
White House is smoking mad at Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who says
he's voting against the climate bill - despite the lobbying of the
entire First Family in the Oval Office last night.If the bill goes down, Obama won't forget Doggett's role, Democrats say.
It's "stunning that he would ignore the wishes not just of his president, but of his constituents and the country," said an administration official.
This
has been a emerging theme among both the White House and House
leadership: that members of Congress have an obligation to carry out
"the wishes of the President" (now, apparently, it's "stunning" when
they defy his dictates). That was the same subservient mentality
that led House Democrats who admitted they opposed the war supplemental
spending and/or the foreign bank bailout to nonetheless vote for the
bill: because they President favored it. The duty of Congress is not
to obey the wishes of the President.
Note, too, that the sort of bullying tactics
that were used for the war supplemental bill and now for the
cap-and-trade bill are only directed towards the House progressives who
want legislation to be less beholden to corporate donors; those tactics
are never invoked against Blue Dogs who play a vital role in impeding
progressive legislation and thus supply the perfect excuse for
Democratic leaders as to why such legislation does not pass (let's see
if these tactics are used against Blue Dogs who impede a public option
for health care, the repeal of DOMA and Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and
various issues relating to the closing of Guantanamo. Will we hear
condemnations from Rahm Emanuel's underlings about how stunning and
outrageous it is that they are defying the wishes of the President?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.