False Health-Scare Ad on CNN
A right-wing group called Conservatives for Patients' Rights is airing
a political attack ad against the idea of a public option for health
insurance by turning upside down an analysis showing that 119 million
Americans would jump from their private health insurer to a government
plan if one existed.
A right-wing group called Conservatives for Patients' Rights is airing
a political attack ad against the idea of a public option for health
insurance by turning upside down an analysis showing that 119 million
Americans would jump from their private health insurer to a government
plan if one existed.
According to that analysis, 119 million Americans - roughly two-thirds
of those now on private plans - would defect to a public option if they
had a choice. But the right-wing group, in airing its ad on CNN,
presents that number as a case of denying those Americans the choice of
staying on their private plans.
"Experts
say a government plan could result in 119 million Americans coming off
their existing coverage," a woman's voice intones over the image of a
Wall Street Journal article. "They'd end up on a government-run plan."
However,
those 119 million Americas would be "coming off their existing
coverage," according to the analysis, because many would choose a
public health option over their existing private plan. In other words,
what the CPR group wants to do is to deny those 119 million Americans
the choice that many of them want.
In
opening the ad, CPR leader Rick Scott explicitly flips the issue of
"choice," maintaining that a public option "could mean taking away your
choice."
Scott is a
multimillionaire who built Columbia/HCA into the largest U.S.
health-care company before being removed by the board of directors in
1997 after a fraud investigation that led to a guilty plea for the
company on overbilling state and federal health plans and to a record
$1.7 billion in fines.
Coordinating
Scott's anti-public-option attack ads is the CRC Public Relations firm
that devised the "Swift boat" attacks on Sen. John Kerry's war record
during Campaign 2004. [Washington Post, May 11, 2009]
In
one of the strange twists of the current health-care debate, the
industry's defenders have repeatedly cited the potential 119 million
American defectors to a public option as an argument for denying them
that choice. The argument is that so many Americans would vote with
their pocketbooks against the private insurers and in favor of a
government-run plan that the private industry would collapse.
"As
many as 119 million Americans would shift from private coverage to the
government plan," one of the industry's chief protectors, Sen. Chuck
Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a column for Politico.com, arguing that the result would be cataclysmic for the industry.
Though some analysts question the accuracy of the 119 million estimate,
its use by industry defenders represents a remarkable admission of
failure by private health insurers to meet the needs of their customers.
That failure was underscored again on Wednesday by the findings of a
congressional investigation that two-thirds of the industry used a
faulty database that overcharged patients for seeing out-of-network
doctors. The use of the flawed database cost private insurance
subscribers billions of dollars that they should not otherwise have
paid, the report said.
Given the many complaints that Americans have expressed over the years
about denials, limits and cost of health insurance, it probably
shouldn't be a surprise that millions of Americans would trust a
government-run insurance plan over a private one.
But the main point of U.S. public opinion has been that health care
reform should offer a choice for Americans to pick one or the other.
According to a New York Times/CBS poll,
72 percent of the American people favor "offering everyone a government
administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete
with private health insurance plans."
However, the attack ad appearing on CNN has turned the choice issue
inside out, with the goal of leaving the American people with only the
choice of signing up with a private insurer or going without insurance.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A right-wing group called Conservatives for Patients' Rights is airing
a political attack ad against the idea of a public option for health
insurance by turning upside down an analysis showing that 119 million
Americans would jump from their private health insurer to a government
plan if one existed.
According to that analysis, 119 million Americans - roughly two-thirds
of those now on private plans - would defect to a public option if they
had a choice. But the right-wing group, in airing its ad on CNN,
presents that number as a case of denying those Americans the choice of
staying on their private plans.
"Experts
say a government plan could result in 119 million Americans coming off
their existing coverage," a woman's voice intones over the image of a
Wall Street Journal article. "They'd end up on a government-run plan."
However,
those 119 million Americas would be "coming off their existing
coverage," according to the analysis, because many would choose a
public health option over their existing private plan. In other words,
what the CPR group wants to do is to deny those 119 million Americans
the choice that many of them want.
In
opening the ad, CPR leader Rick Scott explicitly flips the issue of
"choice," maintaining that a public option "could mean taking away your
choice."
Scott is a
multimillionaire who built Columbia/HCA into the largest U.S.
health-care company before being removed by the board of directors in
1997 after a fraud investigation that led to a guilty plea for the
company on overbilling state and federal health plans and to a record
$1.7 billion in fines.
Coordinating
Scott's anti-public-option attack ads is the CRC Public Relations firm
that devised the "Swift boat" attacks on Sen. John Kerry's war record
during Campaign 2004. [Washington Post, May 11, 2009]
In
one of the strange twists of the current health-care debate, the
industry's defenders have repeatedly cited the potential 119 million
American defectors to a public option as an argument for denying them
that choice. The argument is that so many Americans would vote with
their pocketbooks against the private insurers and in favor of a
government-run plan that the private industry would collapse.
"As
many as 119 million Americans would shift from private coverage to the
government plan," one of the industry's chief protectors, Sen. Chuck
Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a column for Politico.com, arguing that the result would be cataclysmic for the industry.
Though some analysts question the accuracy of the 119 million estimate,
its use by industry defenders represents a remarkable admission of
failure by private health insurers to meet the needs of their customers.
That failure was underscored again on Wednesday by the findings of a
congressional investigation that two-thirds of the industry used a
faulty database that overcharged patients for seeing out-of-network
doctors. The use of the flawed database cost private insurance
subscribers billions of dollars that they should not otherwise have
paid, the report said.
Given the many complaints that Americans have expressed over the years
about denials, limits and cost of health insurance, it probably
shouldn't be a surprise that millions of Americans would trust a
government-run insurance plan over a private one.
But the main point of U.S. public opinion has been that health care
reform should offer a choice for Americans to pick one or the other.
According to a New York Times/CBS poll,
72 percent of the American people favor "offering everyone a government
administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete
with private health insurance plans."
However, the attack ad appearing on CNN has turned the choice issue
inside out, with the goal of leaving the American people with only the
choice of signing up with a private insurer or going without insurance.
A right-wing group called Conservatives for Patients' Rights is airing
a political attack ad against the idea of a public option for health
insurance by turning upside down an analysis showing that 119 million
Americans would jump from their private health insurer to a government
plan if one existed.
According to that analysis, 119 million Americans - roughly two-thirds
of those now on private plans - would defect to a public option if they
had a choice. But the right-wing group, in airing its ad on CNN,
presents that number as a case of denying those Americans the choice of
staying on their private plans.
"Experts
say a government plan could result in 119 million Americans coming off
their existing coverage," a woman's voice intones over the image of a
Wall Street Journal article. "They'd end up on a government-run plan."
However,
those 119 million Americas would be "coming off their existing
coverage," according to the analysis, because many would choose a
public health option over their existing private plan. In other words,
what the CPR group wants to do is to deny those 119 million Americans
the choice that many of them want.
In
opening the ad, CPR leader Rick Scott explicitly flips the issue of
"choice," maintaining that a public option "could mean taking away your
choice."
Scott is a
multimillionaire who built Columbia/HCA into the largest U.S.
health-care company before being removed by the board of directors in
1997 after a fraud investigation that led to a guilty plea for the
company on overbilling state and federal health plans and to a record
$1.7 billion in fines.
Coordinating
Scott's anti-public-option attack ads is the CRC Public Relations firm
that devised the "Swift boat" attacks on Sen. John Kerry's war record
during Campaign 2004. [Washington Post, May 11, 2009]
In
one of the strange twists of the current health-care debate, the
industry's defenders have repeatedly cited the potential 119 million
American defectors to a public option as an argument for denying them
that choice. The argument is that so many Americans would vote with
their pocketbooks against the private insurers and in favor of a
government-run plan that the private industry would collapse.
"As
many as 119 million Americans would shift from private coverage to the
government plan," one of the industry's chief protectors, Sen. Chuck
Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote in a column for Politico.com, arguing that the result would be cataclysmic for the industry.
Though some analysts question the accuracy of the 119 million estimate,
its use by industry defenders represents a remarkable admission of
failure by private health insurers to meet the needs of their customers.
That failure was underscored again on Wednesday by the findings of a
congressional investigation that two-thirds of the industry used a
faulty database that overcharged patients for seeing out-of-network
doctors. The use of the flawed database cost private insurance
subscribers billions of dollars that they should not otherwise have
paid, the report said.
Given the many complaints that Americans have expressed over the years
about denials, limits and cost of health insurance, it probably
shouldn't be a surprise that millions of Americans would trust a
government-run insurance plan over a private one.
But the main point of U.S. public opinion has been that health care
reform should offer a choice for Americans to pick one or the other.
According to a New York Times/CBS poll,
72 percent of the American people favor "offering everyone a government
administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete
with private health insurance plans."
However, the attack ad appearing on CNN has turned the choice issue
inside out, with the goal of leaving the American people with only the
choice of signing up with a private insurer or going without insurance.