Apr 06, 2009
Tim Geithner said on Sunday's Face the Nation that
the Treasury might fire the heads of big banks that depend on financing
from the federal government, just as it summarily deposed Rick Wagoner,
the former CEO of General Motors -- and before Wagoner, the heads of
AIG, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. "Where that requires a change in
management and the board, then we will do that," said Geithner.
I
suppose it's comforting to know our government stands ready to fire
corporate executives and directors whenever taxpayer money is on the
line. But I suspect Geithner's new tough line is mostly designed to
reassure a public that's lost all faith in the wisdom of bailing out
Wall Street.
For the sake of the argument, assume he's sincere.
What criterion will an axe-wielding Geithner be using? If precipitous
loss of shareholder value is enough to "require a change in management
and the board," presumably every CEO and director of every big bank now
being bailed out should be fired, starting with Ken Lewis of Bank of
America.
If the criterion is diversion of taxpayer money to uses
other than Congress intended when it first authorized the $700 billion
bailout, the list of soon-to-be-fired CEOs is a bit shorter but still
large. Surely it includes all the bailed-out banks that continue to fly
their executives around the world in company jets, award them
extraordinary pay packages, and run junkets at fancy resorts.
Citigroup's Vikram Pandit (who collected $38.2 million for his
taxpayer-subsidized services in 2008) comes immediately to mind.
Why
stop there? Perhaps Geithner intends to fire executives and directors
of any company that's dependent on taxpayers and is now losing money.
Just think of the corporate house-cleaning this will mean. Hundreds of
agribusiness executives are now at risk as are scores of military
contractors. Hell, the whole pharmaceutical industry depends on
taxpayer support (research subsidized by National Institutes of Health,
sales subsidized through Medicare and Medicaid), and it's doing badly,
so their executives and directors will be gone soon, too.
All
told, about one out of every five large American companies depends on
government contracts, and a majority of these firms are losing money
right now. So ... off with their heads.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich, is the Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. His book include: "Aftershock" (2011), "The Work of Nations" (1992), "Beyond Outrage" (2012) and, "Saving Capitalism" (2016). He is also a founding editor of The American Prospect magazine, former chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." Reich's newest book is "The Common Good" (2019). He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.
Tim Geithner said on Sunday's Face the Nation that
the Treasury might fire the heads of big banks that depend on financing
from the federal government, just as it summarily deposed Rick Wagoner,
the former CEO of General Motors -- and before Wagoner, the heads of
AIG, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. "Where that requires a change in
management and the board, then we will do that," said Geithner.
I
suppose it's comforting to know our government stands ready to fire
corporate executives and directors whenever taxpayer money is on the
line. But I suspect Geithner's new tough line is mostly designed to
reassure a public that's lost all faith in the wisdom of bailing out
Wall Street.
For the sake of the argument, assume he's sincere.
What criterion will an axe-wielding Geithner be using? If precipitous
loss of shareholder value is enough to "require a change in management
and the board," presumably every CEO and director of every big bank now
being bailed out should be fired, starting with Ken Lewis of Bank of
America.
If the criterion is diversion of taxpayer money to uses
other than Congress intended when it first authorized the $700 billion
bailout, the list of soon-to-be-fired CEOs is a bit shorter but still
large. Surely it includes all the bailed-out banks that continue to fly
their executives around the world in company jets, award them
extraordinary pay packages, and run junkets at fancy resorts.
Citigroup's Vikram Pandit (who collected $38.2 million for his
taxpayer-subsidized services in 2008) comes immediately to mind.
Why
stop there? Perhaps Geithner intends to fire executives and directors
of any company that's dependent on taxpayers and is now losing money.
Just think of the corporate house-cleaning this will mean. Hundreds of
agribusiness executives are now at risk as are scores of military
contractors. Hell, the whole pharmaceutical industry depends on
taxpayer support (research subsidized by National Institutes of Health,
sales subsidized through Medicare and Medicaid), and it's doing badly,
so their executives and directors will be gone soon, too.
All
told, about one out of every five large American companies depends on
government contracts, and a majority of these firms are losing money
right now. So ... off with their heads.
Robert Reich
Robert Reich, is the Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and a senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. His book include: "Aftershock" (2011), "The Work of Nations" (1992), "Beyond Outrage" (2012) and, "Saving Capitalism" (2016). He is also a founding editor of The American Prospect magazine, former chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." Reich's newest book is "The Common Good" (2019). He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.
Tim Geithner said on Sunday's Face the Nation that
the Treasury might fire the heads of big banks that depend on financing
from the federal government, just as it summarily deposed Rick Wagoner,
the former CEO of General Motors -- and before Wagoner, the heads of
AIG, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. "Where that requires a change in
management and the board, then we will do that," said Geithner.
I
suppose it's comforting to know our government stands ready to fire
corporate executives and directors whenever taxpayer money is on the
line. But I suspect Geithner's new tough line is mostly designed to
reassure a public that's lost all faith in the wisdom of bailing out
Wall Street.
For the sake of the argument, assume he's sincere.
What criterion will an axe-wielding Geithner be using? If precipitous
loss of shareholder value is enough to "require a change in management
and the board," presumably every CEO and director of every big bank now
being bailed out should be fired, starting with Ken Lewis of Bank of
America.
If the criterion is diversion of taxpayer money to uses
other than Congress intended when it first authorized the $700 billion
bailout, the list of soon-to-be-fired CEOs is a bit shorter but still
large. Surely it includes all the bailed-out banks that continue to fly
their executives around the world in company jets, award them
extraordinary pay packages, and run junkets at fancy resorts.
Citigroup's Vikram Pandit (who collected $38.2 million for his
taxpayer-subsidized services in 2008) comes immediately to mind.
Why
stop there? Perhaps Geithner intends to fire executives and directors
of any company that's dependent on taxpayers and is now losing money.
Just think of the corporate house-cleaning this will mean. Hundreds of
agribusiness executives are now at risk as are scores of military
contractors. Hell, the whole pharmaceutical industry depends on
taxpayer support (research subsidized by National Institutes of Health,
sales subsidized through Medicare and Medicaid), and it's doing badly,
so their executives and directors will be gone soon, too.
All
told, about one out of every five large American companies depends on
government contracts, and a majority of these firms are losing money
right now. So ... off with their heads.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.