Mar 11, 2009
It's been nominated eight times, but Israel has never won a Best
Foreign Language Film Oscar the 67 times it's been awarded since 1947.
Lebanon has neither won nor been nominated. The two countries were set
to win their first two weeks ago with "Waltz With Bashir." Somehow,
"Departure," a Japanese "Six Feet Under," staged a coup and took the
award, though in my book "Waltz With Bashir" is still the winner, as
were Lebanon, Israel, and a shred of that thing so elusive in stories
out of the Middle East: truth.
had nothing to do with the film. It's officially banned there. It also
had everything to do with it, not just because it's Lebanon's most
popular underground film these days. The movie, by Israeli filmmaker
Ari Folman is an animated documentary about Israel's invasion of
Lebanon in 1982. More particularly, it's Folman's personal
investigation of the most traumatic consequence of that war: The
massacre of up to 3,000 Palestinian civilians by Christian militiamen,
under Israeli supervision, in the refugee sprawls of Sabra and Shatila
on Beirut's fringe.
The events should
be distant history. Folman's movie shocks us into realizing why they
can't be, and why there is no such thing as an "intractable" problem in
the Middle East. There's dishonest (and repressed) memory, the mother
of intractable problems. Then there's the reality of human suffering
bleached of the distorting loyalties to god and country. That's the
suffering Folman comes to terms with, starting with his own. It's the
movie's universal language, touching all that Froman finally remembers
- Israelis, Palestinians, Lebanese, and even, by extension, the
Americans who were dragged into the entirely preventable madness at the
heart of his story.
On June 6, 1982,
Israel invaded Lebanon. Three months and about 18,000 deaths later,
Israel, stopping just short of entering Beirut, the capital, had
achieved its objective. The Palestine Liberation Organization was
defeated, at least in Lebanon, and its fighters dispersed through the
Arab world. Bashir Gemeyel (the Bashir of the movie's title) was a
Christian militia leader allied with Israel. He was as genocidal toward
Palestinians and Muslims as he was revered in Lebanese Christians'
eyes. Rigged into the presidency in the shadow of Israeli tanks, Bashir
was assassinated days before he took office. Israel immediately invaded
Beirut, besieged Sabra and Shatila, mobilized bands of Bashir's men,
and set them loose inside the Palestinian slums, supposedly top "mop
up" remaining Palestinian militants. No one with the barest knowledge
of local bloodlusts, with which Israelis were patently familiar, could
doubt what would happen next. It did. There were no militants in the
camps. Only a massacre.
Ari Folman was
an Israeli soldier in the battalion responsible for sending up flares
at night, from rooftops just outside the camps, so the Christian
militiamen in the Palestinian camps could go about their slaughters
uninterrupted. For more than 20 years Folman had no memory of the
massacre, and only shattered memories of the weeks of wanton violence
leading up to it. He had chosen to repress it all. Who could blame him?
The documentary was his attempt at reconstruction through interviews of
men he served with and a friendly psychiatrist who finally puts it to
him bluntly: "You can't remember the massacre because in your opinion,
the murderers and those around them are the same circle. You felt
guilty at the age of 19. Unwillingly, you took on the role of the Nazi.
You were there firing flares, but you didn't carry out the massacre."
He just helped make it a little more efficient.
was as a consequence of the massacre that President Reagan ordered U.S.
Marines back to Beirut, on a more permanent assignment than their brief
supervision of the evacuation of PLO fighters weeks earlier. There's a
direct link between Sabra and Shatila, the October 1983 bombing that
killed 241 Marines, the rise of Hezbollah in place of the PLO, and the
transformation of South Lebanon into a cyclical launch-pad and target
of vengeful paybacks. That, too, was preventable. Israelis didn't have
to equate occupation with brutality. Americans didn't have to take
side. They did, and still do.
of the massacre has never been fully reckoned with, least of all in
Lebanon, so it's ironic that an Israeli movie is bridging both
countries' memories, and being embraced by both. It's not a solution,
of course. It doesn't repair damages or "heal" anything (as if loss of
that magnitude and the bleeding since can ever heal). It's still only a
movie. But it demolishes convenient assumptions that Arabs and Israelis
don't understand each other. They do, plenty, as first cousins usually
do. But they usually see each other through the lens of official lies,
which for both depend on dehumanizing the other side than seeing it
like the equal that it is. Ari Folman's lens prefers recognition to
© 2023 Pierre Tristam
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.