

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Anyone who purports to be seriously concerned that an untested Caroline Kennedy might "inherit" the U.S. Senate seat from New York has not been paying attention.
Of course, there is something unseemly about the prospect that John F. Kennedy's daughter -- not to mention the niece of Robert and Ted -- might be appointed to the seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designee Hillary Clinton. Most New Yorkers didn't even know that this particular Kennedy lived in the state. And if she has been known for anything until this year it has been for studiously avoided not just the political stage but most serious public-policy debates.
But the notion that Senate appointments go to the most experienced, or qualified, or honorable, or even most politically-appealing contenders is comic in the extreme.
It is not as if Rod Blagojevich was the first governor to think of bartering off a Senate seat to the highest bidder. The governor of Illinois may stand accused of putting a "for sale" sign on a Senate seat, but the only thing that distinguished him from his appointing peers is that he actually dealt in numbers.
When governors are given the authority to fill vacant Senate seats on a whim, the whim will necessarily be a self-serving one. To think otherwise is to imagine that politicians do not worry about whether they will be reelected, about who will support them with money and endorsements, about how to undermine opponents and help friends.
If New York Governor David Paterson ditches Kennedy and appoints another member of a big-name political family, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, to the Senate seat, it won't be because he thought the edgy AG would be the best senator. It will be to eliminate a potential rival at the state level. And so it goes down the appointment list.
The problem is not Caroline Kennedy, or Andrew Cuomo for that matter. It's not Rod Blagojevich or Paterson. It's the fact that governors get to appoint senators.
When a U.S. House seat goes vacant -- due to death or resignation -- the Constitution requires that a special election be held.
When a U.S. Senate seat goes vacant, a Constitutional loophole allows governors in most states to start wheeling and dealing.
It's a lousy loophole.
Governors should not be in the business of appointing senators, be they Kennedys, Cuomos, Smiths or Jones.
The people should make the pick.
The Constitution should be amended to require that all Senate vacancies be filled by special elections.
Then, if Caroline Kennedy wants to become a senator, she can ask the voters to give it to her -- just as her father did in 1952, just as her uncle did in 1962, just as her other uncle did in 1964, and just as Hillary Clinton did in 2000.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Anyone who purports to be seriously concerned that an untested Caroline Kennedy might "inherit" the U.S. Senate seat from New York has not been paying attention.
Of course, there is something unseemly about the prospect that John F. Kennedy's daughter -- not to mention the niece of Robert and Ted -- might be appointed to the seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designee Hillary Clinton. Most New Yorkers didn't even know that this particular Kennedy lived in the state. And if she has been known for anything until this year it has been for studiously avoided not just the political stage but most serious public-policy debates.
But the notion that Senate appointments go to the most experienced, or qualified, or honorable, or even most politically-appealing contenders is comic in the extreme.
It is not as if Rod Blagojevich was the first governor to think of bartering off a Senate seat to the highest bidder. The governor of Illinois may stand accused of putting a "for sale" sign on a Senate seat, but the only thing that distinguished him from his appointing peers is that he actually dealt in numbers.
When governors are given the authority to fill vacant Senate seats on a whim, the whim will necessarily be a self-serving one. To think otherwise is to imagine that politicians do not worry about whether they will be reelected, about who will support them with money and endorsements, about how to undermine opponents and help friends.
If New York Governor David Paterson ditches Kennedy and appoints another member of a big-name political family, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, to the Senate seat, it won't be because he thought the edgy AG would be the best senator. It will be to eliminate a potential rival at the state level. And so it goes down the appointment list.
The problem is not Caroline Kennedy, or Andrew Cuomo for that matter. It's not Rod Blagojevich or Paterson. It's the fact that governors get to appoint senators.
When a U.S. House seat goes vacant -- due to death or resignation -- the Constitution requires that a special election be held.
When a U.S. Senate seat goes vacant, a Constitutional loophole allows governors in most states to start wheeling and dealing.
It's a lousy loophole.
Governors should not be in the business of appointing senators, be they Kennedys, Cuomos, Smiths or Jones.
The people should make the pick.
The Constitution should be amended to require that all Senate vacancies be filled by special elections.
Then, if Caroline Kennedy wants to become a senator, she can ask the voters to give it to her -- just as her father did in 1952, just as her uncle did in 1962, just as her other uncle did in 1964, and just as Hillary Clinton did in 2000.
Anyone who purports to be seriously concerned that an untested Caroline Kennedy might "inherit" the U.S. Senate seat from New York has not been paying attention.
Of course, there is something unseemly about the prospect that John F. Kennedy's daughter -- not to mention the niece of Robert and Ted -- might be appointed to the seat being vacated by Secretary of State-designee Hillary Clinton. Most New Yorkers didn't even know that this particular Kennedy lived in the state. And if she has been known for anything until this year it has been for studiously avoided not just the political stage but most serious public-policy debates.
But the notion that Senate appointments go to the most experienced, or qualified, or honorable, or even most politically-appealing contenders is comic in the extreme.
It is not as if Rod Blagojevich was the first governor to think of bartering off a Senate seat to the highest bidder. The governor of Illinois may stand accused of putting a "for sale" sign on a Senate seat, but the only thing that distinguished him from his appointing peers is that he actually dealt in numbers.
When governors are given the authority to fill vacant Senate seats on a whim, the whim will necessarily be a self-serving one. To think otherwise is to imagine that politicians do not worry about whether they will be reelected, about who will support them with money and endorsements, about how to undermine opponents and help friends.
If New York Governor David Paterson ditches Kennedy and appoints another member of a big-name political family, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, to the Senate seat, it won't be because he thought the edgy AG would be the best senator. It will be to eliminate a potential rival at the state level. And so it goes down the appointment list.
The problem is not Caroline Kennedy, or Andrew Cuomo for that matter. It's not Rod Blagojevich or Paterson. It's the fact that governors get to appoint senators.
When a U.S. House seat goes vacant -- due to death or resignation -- the Constitution requires that a special election be held.
When a U.S. Senate seat goes vacant, a Constitutional loophole allows governors in most states to start wheeling and dealing.
It's a lousy loophole.
Governors should not be in the business of appointing senators, be they Kennedys, Cuomos, Smiths or Jones.
The people should make the pick.
The Constitution should be amended to require that all Senate vacancies be filled by special elections.
Then, if Caroline Kennedy wants to become a senator, she can ask the voters to give it to her -- just as her father did in 1952, just as her uncle did in 1962, just as her other uncle did in 1964, and just as Hillary Clinton did in 2000.