SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A $15 Billion Jumpstart for the Big Three?
Dec 10, 2008
After digesting an abysmal November unemployment report,
House Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is a "car czar" away from working
out the kinks for a $15 billion auto Hail Mary, less than half the
amount requested by the Detroit Three. This bridge loan will supposedly
keep the auto industry running on fumes until March, when Obama's pit
crew can step in.
The numbers the automakers want are big to be sure, but not
compared to those of the banking industry. Yet, Congress is
transferring the caution they should have employed in determining the
Troubled Assets Relief Program to the auto industry.
The American auto industry's lifeline is less than a fraction of
what it cost to bailout AIG alone. And no one from AIG had to face the
Senate Banking Committee to get its $152 billion rescue package.
Indeed, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.)
thought that the automakers made a better case for federal help than
the financial industry did. Of course, Wall Street had the Treasury
Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairman batting for them, whereas the
automakers were on their own. Unfortunately for auto execs, Detroit's
poor business model is far more transparent than Wall Street's. With
Wall Street, the lack of clarity helped bag the money.
So what's the problem? Well, unless the economy turns around within
the next three months or Americans spend their last bits of credit on
D-3 cars, merely getting government loans and cutting expenses won't be
enough to stave off the next request for dough-way before March.
That's why Sen. Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) question
to the execs, "How are you going to pay it back?" was spot-on. So was
the one about why the execs were only asking for $34 billion, rather
than the $75 to $125 billion that the automakers said they'd ultimately
need to avoid bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy is a scary thought. But there's a scarier one: the dreaded, risky, murky, unregulated financial instrument known as credit default swaps.
When GM's CEO, Rick Wagoner, said, "there's a significant amount of
credit default swaps that would be triggered in a bankruptcy, in
addition to credit lines with major institutions," eyebrows raised.
Still, the only thing that will fix a cash flow problem is cash flow. Ford is considering
the sale of Volvo, but the problem is a lack of buyers. Every car
company is hurting. Every private equity company, even those that own
car companies, is watching from the sidelines.
So, maybe the conversation in Congress should have centered on
trying to figure out a way to make money out of existing inventory. If
languishing vehicles are part of the problem, let's make them part of
the solution, too.
Subsidizing low-cost consumer driven purchases would move current
inventory and pre-establish a set of buyers to switch into the new
lines of more fuel-efficient cars when they come about. This would
ensure present and future cash flow. Otherwise, layoffs, UAW
concessions, not funding off-book health care plans, closing plants,
and the fire sale of brands, just won't plug the dam of losses. That
said, trillions of dollars hasn't stopped the fallout from Wall Street, either.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Mother Jones
Nomi Prins
Nomi Prins is a former Wall Street executive and author. Her newest book is "Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World" (2019). Her previous books include "Other People's Money: The Corporate Mugging of America" (2006).
After digesting an abysmal November unemployment report,
House Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is a "car czar" away from working
out the kinks for a $15 billion auto Hail Mary, less than half the
amount requested by the Detroit Three. This bridge loan will supposedly
keep the auto industry running on fumes until March, when Obama's pit
crew can step in.
The numbers the automakers want are big to be sure, but not
compared to those of the banking industry. Yet, Congress is
transferring the caution they should have employed in determining the
Troubled Assets Relief Program to the auto industry.
The American auto industry's lifeline is less than a fraction of
what it cost to bailout AIG alone. And no one from AIG had to face the
Senate Banking Committee to get its $152 billion rescue package.
Indeed, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.)
thought that the automakers made a better case for federal help than
the financial industry did. Of course, Wall Street had the Treasury
Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairman batting for them, whereas the
automakers were on their own. Unfortunately for auto execs, Detroit's
poor business model is far more transparent than Wall Street's. With
Wall Street, the lack of clarity helped bag the money.
So what's the problem? Well, unless the economy turns around within
the next three months or Americans spend their last bits of credit on
D-3 cars, merely getting government loans and cutting expenses won't be
enough to stave off the next request for dough-way before March.
That's why Sen. Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) question
to the execs, "How are you going to pay it back?" was spot-on. So was
the one about why the execs were only asking for $34 billion, rather
than the $75 to $125 billion that the automakers said they'd ultimately
need to avoid bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy is a scary thought. But there's a scarier one: the dreaded, risky, murky, unregulated financial instrument known as credit default swaps.
When GM's CEO, Rick Wagoner, said, "there's a significant amount of
credit default swaps that would be triggered in a bankruptcy, in
addition to credit lines with major institutions," eyebrows raised.
Still, the only thing that will fix a cash flow problem is cash flow. Ford is considering
the sale of Volvo, but the problem is a lack of buyers. Every car
company is hurting. Every private equity company, even those that own
car companies, is watching from the sidelines.
So, maybe the conversation in Congress should have centered on
trying to figure out a way to make money out of existing inventory. If
languishing vehicles are part of the problem, let's make them part of
the solution, too.
Subsidizing low-cost consumer driven purchases would move current
inventory and pre-establish a set of buyers to switch into the new
lines of more fuel-efficient cars when they come about. This would
ensure present and future cash flow. Otherwise, layoffs, UAW
concessions, not funding off-book health care plans, closing plants,
and the fire sale of brands, just won't plug the dam of losses. That
said, trillions of dollars hasn't stopped the fallout from Wall Street, either.
Nomi Prins
Nomi Prins is a former Wall Street executive and author. Her newest book is "Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World" (2019). Her previous books include "Other People's Money: The Corporate Mugging of America" (2006).
After digesting an abysmal November unemployment report,
House Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is a "car czar" away from working
out the kinks for a $15 billion auto Hail Mary, less than half the
amount requested by the Detroit Three. This bridge loan will supposedly
keep the auto industry running on fumes until March, when Obama's pit
crew can step in.
The numbers the automakers want are big to be sure, but not
compared to those of the banking industry. Yet, Congress is
transferring the caution they should have employed in determining the
Troubled Assets Relief Program to the auto industry.
The American auto industry's lifeline is less than a fraction of
what it cost to bailout AIG alone. And no one from AIG had to face the
Senate Banking Committee to get its $152 billion rescue package.
Indeed, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.)
thought that the automakers made a better case for federal help than
the financial industry did. Of course, Wall Street had the Treasury
Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairman batting for them, whereas the
automakers were on their own. Unfortunately for auto execs, Detroit's
poor business model is far more transparent than Wall Street's. With
Wall Street, the lack of clarity helped bag the money.
So what's the problem? Well, unless the economy turns around within
the next three months or Americans spend their last bits of credit on
D-3 cars, merely getting government loans and cutting expenses won't be
enough to stave off the next request for dough-way before March.
That's why Sen. Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) question
to the execs, "How are you going to pay it back?" was spot-on. So was
the one about why the execs were only asking for $34 billion, rather
than the $75 to $125 billion that the automakers said they'd ultimately
need to avoid bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy is a scary thought. But there's a scarier one: the dreaded, risky, murky, unregulated financial instrument known as credit default swaps.
When GM's CEO, Rick Wagoner, said, "there's a significant amount of
credit default swaps that would be triggered in a bankruptcy, in
addition to credit lines with major institutions," eyebrows raised.
Still, the only thing that will fix a cash flow problem is cash flow. Ford is considering
the sale of Volvo, but the problem is a lack of buyers. Every car
company is hurting. Every private equity company, even those that own
car companies, is watching from the sidelines.
So, maybe the conversation in Congress should have centered on
trying to figure out a way to make money out of existing inventory. If
languishing vehicles are part of the problem, let's make them part of
the solution, too.
Subsidizing low-cost consumer driven purchases would move current
inventory and pre-establish a set of buyers to switch into the new
lines of more fuel-efficient cars when they come about. This would
ensure present and future cash flow. Otherwise, layoffs, UAW
concessions, not funding off-book health care plans, closing plants,
and the fire sale of brands, just won't plug the dam of losses. That
said, trillions of dollars hasn't stopped the fallout from Wall Street, either.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.