

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I am going down to Washington, D.C. to ask for a handout.
My industry is falling on hard times and needs at least $34 billion to cover basic operating costs--but I assure you the emergency aid isn't just for me and my associates. The truth is my industry is too big to fail, and if it were to go under it would have disastrous effects for the economy and millions of Americans lives.
No, I am not an automaker executive from one of the Big Three (General Motors, Chrysler, Ford)--I teach social studies to 13-year-olds and the Public Schools are my trade.
I am going down to Washington, D.C. to ask for a handout.
My industry is falling on hard times and needs at least $34 billion to cover basic operating costs--but I assure you the emergency aid isn't just for me and my associates. The truth is my industry is too big to fail, and if it were to go under it would have disastrous effects for the economy and millions of Americans lives.
No, I am not an automaker executive from one of the Big Three (General Motors, Chrysler, Ford)--I teach social studies to 13-year-olds and the Public Schools are my trade.
And if "letting GM go is a terrible idea"--as General Motors Corp. Chief Executive Rick Wagoner recently warned Congress in his plea for a bailout of his failing company--then letting our schools fail in the wake of free-falling state budgets would be catastrophic.
The vast majority of school funds come from
state budgets and already more than half the states have cut spending or used reserves, according to The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The downturn in the housing market has led to a drop in state revenue from sales taxes associated with construction materials and other goods. Economists are now certain that local revenues will drop over the next few years as real estate values decline, generating less in local property taxes for school budgets.
In Seattle, where I teach, there is a projected school budget shortfall for the coming year of at least $24 million--an amount that could grow significantly in the face of the recently announced $5.1 billion Washington State budget deficit. The ailing economy has prompted Seattle schools Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson to propose closing at least 9 schools in the District, the second round of school closures in the past few years. But the bitter reality is
that the closing of schools will only save an estimated $3.6 million--nowhere near the tens of millions of dollars we need--and will only serve to create turmoil for the many communities that will loose their neighborhood school.
The argument for letting kids cut to the front of the funding line--ahead of bankers and auto industry executives--is clear: kids are more valuable than Cadillacs.
While spinning rims and glossy chrome on an Escalade embody the image of wealth, America's pupils are far more valuable. Allowing our schools to be de-funded state-by-state would have a catastrophic effect on our economy and our society.
According to Alliance for Excellent Education, a Washington, D.C. based policy and advocacy organization, if the nation's students who dropped out of the class of 2008 had graduated, the US economy would have benefited from an additional $319 billion in income over the course of their lives.
As the Alliance further explains, "In addition to earning higher wages, which results in attendant benefits to local, state, and national economic conditions, high school graduates live longer, are less likely to be teen parents, and are more likely to raise healthier, better-educated children."
"The children are the future" should be cliched common sense--but with a free market system enslaved to short term balance ledgers, we have seen immediate gain outweigh any planning for tomorrow.
GM, Chrysler and Ford, for example, resisted the pressure to make cars with higher standards on fuel efficiency and continued producing flashy SUVs and pickup trucks that were so profitable in the 1990s.
Now that lack of foresight has thrust American auto manufacturers into crisis, they have warmed up to the idea of a government directed economy--as long as it's directed toward saving their own "backseats."
With the public experiencing "bailout fatigue," corporate America is attempting to repackage its image as some kind of militant student leader taking on the powers that be.
In a virtual Chevy Corvette turns Stokely Carmichael, General Motors declared, "Mobilize Now!" on its website, GMfactsandfiction.com. "Tell your U.S. Senators and Representatives that support for the U.S. auto industry is in America 's best economic interest."
This appeal to mobilize masses has the shrill tone of a teacher yelling at a disinterested class, given that the Big Three just cut back health care benefits for some 2 million employees.
If we can keep the funding for the music program, students across America should be taught the old Tom Paxton song that goes,
"I'm changing my name to Chrysler/I am leaving for that great receiving line/When they hand a
million grand out, I'll be standing with my hand out/Yes sir, I'll get mine!"
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I am going down to Washington, D.C. to ask for a handout.
My industry is falling on hard times and needs at least $34 billion to cover basic operating costs--but I assure you the emergency aid isn't just for me and my associates. The truth is my industry is too big to fail, and if it were to go under it would have disastrous effects for the economy and millions of Americans lives.
No, I am not an automaker executive from one of the Big Three (General Motors, Chrysler, Ford)--I teach social studies to 13-year-olds and the Public Schools are my trade.
And if "letting GM go is a terrible idea"--as General Motors Corp. Chief Executive Rick Wagoner recently warned Congress in his plea for a bailout of his failing company--then letting our schools fail in the wake of free-falling state budgets would be catastrophic.
The vast majority of school funds come from
state budgets and already more than half the states have cut spending or used reserves, according to The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The downturn in the housing market has led to a drop in state revenue from sales taxes associated with construction materials and other goods. Economists are now certain that local revenues will drop over the next few years as real estate values decline, generating less in local property taxes for school budgets.
In Seattle, where I teach, there is a projected school budget shortfall for the coming year of at least $24 million--an amount that could grow significantly in the face of the recently announced $5.1 billion Washington State budget deficit. The ailing economy has prompted Seattle schools Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson to propose closing at least 9 schools in the District, the second round of school closures in the past few years. But the bitter reality is
that the closing of schools will only save an estimated $3.6 million--nowhere near the tens of millions of dollars we need--and will only serve to create turmoil for the many communities that will loose their neighborhood school.
The argument for letting kids cut to the front of the funding line--ahead of bankers and auto industry executives--is clear: kids are more valuable than Cadillacs.
While spinning rims and glossy chrome on an Escalade embody the image of wealth, America's pupils are far more valuable. Allowing our schools to be de-funded state-by-state would have a catastrophic effect on our economy and our society.
According to Alliance for Excellent Education, a Washington, D.C. based policy and advocacy organization, if the nation's students who dropped out of the class of 2008 had graduated, the US economy would have benefited from an additional $319 billion in income over the course of their lives.
As the Alliance further explains, "In addition to earning higher wages, which results in attendant benefits to local, state, and national economic conditions, high school graduates live longer, are less likely to be teen parents, and are more likely to raise healthier, better-educated children."
"The children are the future" should be cliched common sense--but with a free market system enslaved to short term balance ledgers, we have seen immediate gain outweigh any planning for tomorrow.
GM, Chrysler and Ford, for example, resisted the pressure to make cars with higher standards on fuel efficiency and continued producing flashy SUVs and pickup trucks that were so profitable in the 1990s.
Now that lack of foresight has thrust American auto manufacturers into crisis, they have warmed up to the idea of a government directed economy--as long as it's directed toward saving their own "backseats."
With the public experiencing "bailout fatigue," corporate America is attempting to repackage its image as some kind of militant student leader taking on the powers that be.
In a virtual Chevy Corvette turns Stokely Carmichael, General Motors declared, "Mobilize Now!" on its website, GMfactsandfiction.com. "Tell your U.S. Senators and Representatives that support for the U.S. auto industry is in America 's best economic interest."
This appeal to mobilize masses has the shrill tone of a teacher yelling at a disinterested class, given that the Big Three just cut back health care benefits for some 2 million employees.
If we can keep the funding for the music program, students across America should be taught the old Tom Paxton song that goes,
"I'm changing my name to Chrysler/I am leaving for that great receiving line/When they hand a
million grand out, I'll be standing with my hand out/Yes sir, I'll get mine!"
I am going down to Washington, D.C. to ask for a handout.
My industry is falling on hard times and needs at least $34 billion to cover basic operating costs--but I assure you the emergency aid isn't just for me and my associates. The truth is my industry is too big to fail, and if it were to go under it would have disastrous effects for the economy and millions of Americans lives.
No, I am not an automaker executive from one of the Big Three (General Motors, Chrysler, Ford)--I teach social studies to 13-year-olds and the Public Schools are my trade.
And if "letting GM go is a terrible idea"--as General Motors Corp. Chief Executive Rick Wagoner recently warned Congress in his plea for a bailout of his failing company--then letting our schools fail in the wake of free-falling state budgets would be catastrophic.
The vast majority of school funds come from
state budgets and already more than half the states have cut spending or used reserves, according to The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The downturn in the housing market has led to a drop in state revenue from sales taxes associated with construction materials and other goods. Economists are now certain that local revenues will drop over the next few years as real estate values decline, generating less in local property taxes for school budgets.
In Seattle, where I teach, there is a projected school budget shortfall for the coming year of at least $24 million--an amount that could grow significantly in the face of the recently announced $5.1 billion Washington State budget deficit. The ailing economy has prompted Seattle schools Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson to propose closing at least 9 schools in the District, the second round of school closures in the past few years. But the bitter reality is
that the closing of schools will only save an estimated $3.6 million--nowhere near the tens of millions of dollars we need--and will only serve to create turmoil for the many communities that will loose their neighborhood school.
The argument for letting kids cut to the front of the funding line--ahead of bankers and auto industry executives--is clear: kids are more valuable than Cadillacs.
While spinning rims and glossy chrome on an Escalade embody the image of wealth, America's pupils are far more valuable. Allowing our schools to be de-funded state-by-state would have a catastrophic effect on our economy and our society.
According to Alliance for Excellent Education, a Washington, D.C. based policy and advocacy organization, if the nation's students who dropped out of the class of 2008 had graduated, the US economy would have benefited from an additional $319 billion in income over the course of their lives.
As the Alliance further explains, "In addition to earning higher wages, which results in attendant benefits to local, state, and national economic conditions, high school graduates live longer, are less likely to be teen parents, and are more likely to raise healthier, better-educated children."
"The children are the future" should be cliched common sense--but with a free market system enslaved to short term balance ledgers, we have seen immediate gain outweigh any planning for tomorrow.
GM, Chrysler and Ford, for example, resisted the pressure to make cars with higher standards on fuel efficiency and continued producing flashy SUVs and pickup trucks that were so profitable in the 1990s.
Now that lack of foresight has thrust American auto manufacturers into crisis, they have warmed up to the idea of a government directed economy--as long as it's directed toward saving their own "backseats."
With the public experiencing "bailout fatigue," corporate America is attempting to repackage its image as some kind of militant student leader taking on the powers that be.
In a virtual Chevy Corvette turns Stokely Carmichael, General Motors declared, "Mobilize Now!" on its website, GMfactsandfiction.com. "Tell your U.S. Senators and Representatives that support for the U.S. auto industry is in America 's best economic interest."
This appeal to mobilize masses has the shrill tone of a teacher yelling at a disinterested class, given that the Big Three just cut back health care benefits for some 2 million employees.
If we can keep the funding for the music program, students across America should be taught the old Tom Paxton song that goes,
"I'm changing my name to Chrysler/I am leaving for that great receiving line/When they hand a
million grand out, I'll be standing with my hand out/Yes sir, I'll get mine!"