

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Did a substantive Sarah Palin show up? Darn right she did. And if you are an endangered species, look out.
As Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden gave a steady performance, Palin revealed herself to be an understudy of President Bush when she said she did not want to argue about the causes of global warming. Of course she did not want to argue about it on the national stage, because she has been doing as governor of Alaska what Bush has done in the White House: Say you want sound science and then ignore it.
When she ran for governor, Palin said she was unconvinced that human emissions are a major cause of global warming. When even the Bush White House was willing to put the polar bear on the endangered species list, Palin - with Alaska's oil and gas industries in mind - wrote Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne to protest, "I am concerned that the determination made by the service is based on incomplete information . . . The consequences of listing the polar bear will have widespread social and economic impacts without providing any more protection for the bears."
In an even more direct missive to Kempthorne, Palin wrote that endangered species protection "has the potential to damage Alaska's and the nation's economy without any benefit to polar bear numbers or their habitat."
Palin last year referred to the polar bear as an exaggerated "metaphor in the highly charged climate change debate." With a denial of the impact of global warming that is even worse than that of the Bush administration, she confirmed that she herself is a metaphor - for a Republican Party fatally unsound in dealing with sound science.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Did a substantive Sarah Palin show up? Darn right she did. And if you are an endangered species, look out.
As Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden gave a steady performance, Palin revealed herself to be an understudy of President Bush when she said she did not want to argue about the causes of global warming. Of course she did not want to argue about it on the national stage, because she has been doing as governor of Alaska what Bush has done in the White House: Say you want sound science and then ignore it.
When she ran for governor, Palin said she was unconvinced that human emissions are a major cause of global warming. When even the Bush White House was willing to put the polar bear on the endangered species list, Palin - with Alaska's oil and gas industries in mind - wrote Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne to protest, "I am concerned that the determination made by the service is based on incomplete information . . . The consequences of listing the polar bear will have widespread social and economic impacts without providing any more protection for the bears."
In an even more direct missive to Kempthorne, Palin wrote that endangered species protection "has the potential to damage Alaska's and the nation's economy without any benefit to polar bear numbers or their habitat."
Palin last year referred to the polar bear as an exaggerated "metaphor in the highly charged climate change debate." With a denial of the impact of global warming that is even worse than that of the Bush administration, she confirmed that she herself is a metaphor - for a Republican Party fatally unsound in dealing with sound science.
Did a substantive Sarah Palin show up? Darn right she did. And if you are an endangered species, look out.
As Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden gave a steady performance, Palin revealed herself to be an understudy of President Bush when she said she did not want to argue about the causes of global warming. Of course she did not want to argue about it on the national stage, because she has been doing as governor of Alaska what Bush has done in the White House: Say you want sound science and then ignore it.
When she ran for governor, Palin said she was unconvinced that human emissions are a major cause of global warming. When even the Bush White House was willing to put the polar bear on the endangered species list, Palin - with Alaska's oil and gas industries in mind - wrote Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne to protest, "I am concerned that the determination made by the service is based on incomplete information . . . The consequences of listing the polar bear will have widespread social and economic impacts without providing any more protection for the bears."
In an even more direct missive to Kempthorne, Palin wrote that endangered species protection "has the potential to damage Alaska's and the nation's economy without any benefit to polar bear numbers or their habitat."
Palin last year referred to the polar bear as an exaggerated "metaphor in the highly charged climate change debate." With a denial of the impact of global warming that is even worse than that of the Bush administration, she confirmed that she herself is a metaphor - for a Republican Party fatally unsound in dealing with sound science.