

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
There is one group of veterans that isn't allowed to march in the national memorial parade in Washington on Monday.
That's the Veterans for Peace, Delwin Anderson Memorial chapter, based in D.C. It's named after a World War II vet who fought in Italy and then worked for the VA for many years designing programs for injured veterans.
The group had applied to join the National Memorial Day parade.
And initially, anyway, it was accepted.
But then, late last month, the group was told that it didn't meet the criteria to participate.
The American Veterans Center, which runs the parade, told them "we cannot have elements in the parade that have any type of political message or wish to promote a point of view."
But other groups, like the American Legion, will be participating in the parade.
Its creed is to defend "God and country" and to "foster and perpetuate a 100 percent Americanism."
And check out the list of major sponsors for the parade. They include: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, the nation of Kuwait, the U.S. Army, and even the NRA.
"We're striving to keep political statements out of the parade," says Jordan Cross, communications director of the American Veterans Center. "Last year, we had two groups who supported the war, and we turned them down."
Cross says that when the American Veterans Center looked more closely at the Vets for Peace application and "saw what they were requesting, to carry a coffin in the parade, and all that jazz," it decided not to let them participate.
Michael Marceau, a wounded Vietnam vet, serves as vice president of the D.C. Vets for Peace group. "We're puzzled," he said, adding that he felt "very disrespected."
Caroline Anderson, the widow of Delwin Anderson, was supposed to ride in the parade in a convertible. Bashful, she doesn't want to talk about herself or on behalf of the Vets for Peace chapter. But she is not happy about the expulsion. "It's a great disappointment," she says, "to feel that other veterans would not allow them to be with them and march, just because they're for peace."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
There is one group of veterans that isn't allowed to march in the national memorial parade in Washington on Monday.
That's the Veterans for Peace, Delwin Anderson Memorial chapter, based in D.C. It's named after a World War II vet who fought in Italy and then worked for the VA for many years designing programs for injured veterans.
The group had applied to join the National Memorial Day parade.
And initially, anyway, it was accepted.
But then, late last month, the group was told that it didn't meet the criteria to participate.
The American Veterans Center, which runs the parade, told them "we cannot have elements in the parade that have any type of political message or wish to promote a point of view."
But other groups, like the American Legion, will be participating in the parade.
Its creed is to defend "God and country" and to "foster and perpetuate a 100 percent Americanism."
And check out the list of major sponsors for the parade. They include: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, the nation of Kuwait, the U.S. Army, and even the NRA.
"We're striving to keep political statements out of the parade," says Jordan Cross, communications director of the American Veterans Center. "Last year, we had two groups who supported the war, and we turned them down."
Cross says that when the American Veterans Center looked more closely at the Vets for Peace application and "saw what they were requesting, to carry a coffin in the parade, and all that jazz," it decided not to let them participate.
Michael Marceau, a wounded Vietnam vet, serves as vice president of the D.C. Vets for Peace group. "We're puzzled," he said, adding that he felt "very disrespected."
Caroline Anderson, the widow of Delwin Anderson, was supposed to ride in the parade in a convertible. Bashful, she doesn't want to talk about herself or on behalf of the Vets for Peace chapter. But she is not happy about the expulsion. "It's a great disappointment," she says, "to feel that other veterans would not allow them to be with them and march, just because they're for peace."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive
There is one group of veterans that isn't allowed to march in the national memorial parade in Washington on Monday.
That's the Veterans for Peace, Delwin Anderson Memorial chapter, based in D.C. It's named after a World War II vet who fought in Italy and then worked for the VA for many years designing programs for injured veterans.
The group had applied to join the National Memorial Day parade.
And initially, anyway, it was accepted.
But then, late last month, the group was told that it didn't meet the criteria to participate.
The American Veterans Center, which runs the parade, told them "we cannot have elements in the parade that have any type of political message or wish to promote a point of view."
But other groups, like the American Legion, will be participating in the parade.
Its creed is to defend "God and country" and to "foster and perpetuate a 100 percent Americanism."
And check out the list of major sponsors for the parade. They include: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, the nation of Kuwait, the U.S. Army, and even the NRA.
"We're striving to keep political statements out of the parade," says Jordan Cross, communications director of the American Veterans Center. "Last year, we had two groups who supported the war, and we turned them down."
Cross says that when the American Veterans Center looked more closely at the Vets for Peace application and "saw what they were requesting, to carry a coffin in the parade, and all that jazz," it decided not to let them participate.
Michael Marceau, a wounded Vietnam vet, serves as vice president of the D.C. Vets for Peace group. "We're puzzled," he said, adding that he felt "very disrespected."
Caroline Anderson, the widow of Delwin Anderson, was supposed to ride in the parade in a convertible. Bashful, she doesn't want to talk about herself or on behalf of the Vets for Peace chapter. But she is not happy about the expulsion. "It's a great disappointment," she says, "to feel that other veterans would not allow them to be with them and march, just because they're for peace."
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive