SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I've been joking the last few years that if you invested in military stocks on January 20, 2001, you'd be sitting pretty right now.
Well, now I've got some more evidence to back up that not-so-funny joke.
Since the Iraq War began, aerospace and defense industry stocks have more than doubled.
General Dynamics did even better than that.
Its stock has tripled.
Banking on its Abrams tanks and Stryker troop transports, General Dynamics gobbled up $2.35 billion "in war revenue last year," according to Bloomberg News.
"The war has been a huge benefit to almost all contractors," William Hartung of the New America Foundation told Bloomberg.
War profiteering is not news, I suppose. But it is disgusting. And those who are profiting from the war are Bush and Cheney's cronies in the corporate boardrooms. For them, war is not a bloody tragedy, it's a golden opportunity. Bush's "base" is doing just fine.
Almost 100 years ago, back in 1911, Fighting Bob La Follette, the pioneer of the Progressive movement and founder of the magazine I'm working for, opposed U.S. intervention in Mexico and asked a crucial question:
"Have we come to this point, that patriotism, valor, and life and death are openly made the pawns of Wall Street's politicians, to be moved about as suits the greater profits of Wall Street's master spirits?"
Unfortunately, the answer to that question is yes.
La Follette also said, in January 1917, "If our nation manufactured its own munitions in its own factories at cost, it would take the private profit out of war, and the war traders out of American politics.'
Alas, the war traders have not yet been expelled from the temple of American politics.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I've been joking the last few years that if you invested in military stocks on January 20, 2001, you'd be sitting pretty right now.
Well, now I've got some more evidence to back up that not-so-funny joke.
Since the Iraq War began, aerospace and defense industry stocks have more than doubled.
General Dynamics did even better than that.
Its stock has tripled.
Banking on its Abrams tanks and Stryker troop transports, General Dynamics gobbled up $2.35 billion "in war revenue last year," according to Bloomberg News.
"The war has been a huge benefit to almost all contractors," William Hartung of the New America Foundation told Bloomberg.
War profiteering is not news, I suppose. But it is disgusting. And those who are profiting from the war are Bush and Cheney's cronies in the corporate boardrooms. For them, war is not a bloody tragedy, it's a golden opportunity. Bush's "base" is doing just fine.
Almost 100 years ago, back in 1911, Fighting Bob La Follette, the pioneer of the Progressive movement and founder of the magazine I'm working for, opposed U.S. intervention in Mexico and asked a crucial question:
"Have we come to this point, that patriotism, valor, and life and death are openly made the pawns of Wall Street's politicians, to be moved about as suits the greater profits of Wall Street's master spirits?"
Unfortunately, the answer to that question is yes.
La Follette also said, in January 1917, "If our nation manufactured its own munitions in its own factories at cost, it would take the private profit out of war, and the war traders out of American politics.'
Alas, the war traders have not yet been expelled from the temple of American politics.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive
I've been joking the last few years that if you invested in military stocks on January 20, 2001, you'd be sitting pretty right now.
Well, now I've got some more evidence to back up that not-so-funny joke.
Since the Iraq War began, aerospace and defense industry stocks have more than doubled.
General Dynamics did even better than that.
Its stock has tripled.
Banking on its Abrams tanks and Stryker troop transports, General Dynamics gobbled up $2.35 billion "in war revenue last year," according to Bloomberg News.
"The war has been a huge benefit to almost all contractors," William Hartung of the New America Foundation told Bloomberg.
War profiteering is not news, I suppose. But it is disgusting. And those who are profiting from the war are Bush and Cheney's cronies in the corporate boardrooms. For them, war is not a bloody tragedy, it's a golden opportunity. Bush's "base" is doing just fine.
Almost 100 years ago, back in 1911, Fighting Bob La Follette, the pioneer of the Progressive movement and founder of the magazine I'm working for, opposed U.S. intervention in Mexico and asked a crucial question:
"Have we come to this point, that patriotism, valor, and life and death are openly made the pawns of Wall Street's politicians, to be moved about as suits the greater profits of Wall Street's master spirits?"
Unfortunately, the answer to that question is yes.
La Follette also said, in January 1917, "If our nation manufactured its own munitions in its own factories at cost, it would take the private profit out of war, and the war traders out of American politics.'
Alas, the war traders have not yet been expelled from the temple of American politics.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2008 The Progressive