

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Nearly three years and three foreign secretaries on from Liberty's first call for an investigation into UK involvement in extraordinary rendition flights, the Government has admitted that US rendition flights did stop on UK territory.
While I welcome Mr Miliband's admission and apology to the House of Commons - tardy and not entirely unsurprising though it may be - it certainly raises the question as to why it took us so long to get to this point. Liberty first wrote to the Foreign Secretary, then Jack Straw, in November 2005 expressing concern that the UK was complicit in torture flights. Rebuffed, we tried again the following year with his successor, Margaret Beckett. Once again, we were given short shrift.
So here we are, tainted by this ugly practice. It is easy to feel smug and superior about the Bush administration and, yes, its use of kidnap and torture is reprehensible in the extreme. But the "they didn't tell us!" excuse doesn't wash. Since when was our sovereign government dependent on another to keep us informed about what is happening on UK territory?
Our Government had a responsibility to investigate the allegations, a responsibility it systematically ducked. Rather than looking the other way with fingers stuck firmly in ears, there should have been a proactive and aggressive inquiry into when and why US military flights were accessing our airspace.
What should the next step be? The first must be to ensure we are never party to the shame that is extraordinary rendition ever again.
The second must be a full and proper investigation a lot closer to home. Then we can perhaps begin to forge a new "special relationship" with our cousins across the Atlantic at this historic moment in their political history.
This time, the relationship will be based on democratic values rather than our shared guilt in the grubbiest secret of the war on terror.
Shami Chakrabarti is the director of Liberty.
(c) 2008 independent.co.uk
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Nearly three years and three foreign secretaries on from Liberty's first call for an investigation into UK involvement in extraordinary rendition flights, the Government has admitted that US rendition flights did stop on UK territory.
While I welcome Mr Miliband's admission and apology to the House of Commons - tardy and not entirely unsurprising though it may be - it certainly raises the question as to why it took us so long to get to this point. Liberty first wrote to the Foreign Secretary, then Jack Straw, in November 2005 expressing concern that the UK was complicit in torture flights. Rebuffed, we tried again the following year with his successor, Margaret Beckett. Once again, we were given short shrift.
So here we are, tainted by this ugly practice. It is easy to feel smug and superior about the Bush administration and, yes, its use of kidnap and torture is reprehensible in the extreme. But the "they didn't tell us!" excuse doesn't wash. Since when was our sovereign government dependent on another to keep us informed about what is happening on UK territory?
Our Government had a responsibility to investigate the allegations, a responsibility it systematically ducked. Rather than looking the other way with fingers stuck firmly in ears, there should have been a proactive and aggressive inquiry into when and why US military flights were accessing our airspace.
What should the next step be? The first must be to ensure we are never party to the shame that is extraordinary rendition ever again.
The second must be a full and proper investigation a lot closer to home. Then we can perhaps begin to forge a new "special relationship" with our cousins across the Atlantic at this historic moment in their political history.
This time, the relationship will be based on democratic values rather than our shared guilt in the grubbiest secret of the war on terror.
Shami Chakrabarti is the director of Liberty.
(c) 2008 independent.co.uk
Nearly three years and three foreign secretaries on from Liberty's first call for an investigation into UK involvement in extraordinary rendition flights, the Government has admitted that US rendition flights did stop on UK territory.
While I welcome Mr Miliband's admission and apology to the House of Commons - tardy and not entirely unsurprising though it may be - it certainly raises the question as to why it took us so long to get to this point. Liberty first wrote to the Foreign Secretary, then Jack Straw, in November 2005 expressing concern that the UK was complicit in torture flights. Rebuffed, we tried again the following year with his successor, Margaret Beckett. Once again, we were given short shrift.
So here we are, tainted by this ugly practice. It is easy to feel smug and superior about the Bush administration and, yes, its use of kidnap and torture is reprehensible in the extreme. But the "they didn't tell us!" excuse doesn't wash. Since when was our sovereign government dependent on another to keep us informed about what is happening on UK territory?
Our Government had a responsibility to investigate the allegations, a responsibility it systematically ducked. Rather than looking the other way with fingers stuck firmly in ears, there should have been a proactive and aggressive inquiry into when and why US military flights were accessing our airspace.
What should the next step be? The first must be to ensure we are never party to the shame that is extraordinary rendition ever again.
The second must be a full and proper investigation a lot closer to home. Then we can perhaps begin to forge a new "special relationship" with our cousins across the Atlantic at this historic moment in their political history.
This time, the relationship will be based on democratic values rather than our shared guilt in the grubbiest secret of the war on terror.
Shami Chakrabarti is the director of Liberty.
(c) 2008 independent.co.uk