SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Who Were the Democrats Who Voted Against Preventing War with Iran?
May 19, 2007
On Wednesday, the House voted on two amendments to the defense authorization bill that would have restricted the ability of the Bush Administration to launch an attack on Iran.
An amendment introduced by Reps. DeFazio, Paul, Hinchey, and Lee would have explicitly blocked military action against Iran without Congressional authorization. I say "explicitly" because under the Constitution, of course, Congress has the sole power to declare war.
But as the amendment authors have noted, Bush Administration officials have tried to claim that the Bush Administration has the authority to attack Iran without Congressional authorization.
The amendment failed 136-288, with 100 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
A narrower amendment offered by Rep. Andrews would have prevented funds authorized in the bill for the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan from being obligated or expended to plan a contingency operation in Iran. This amendment also failed, but the vote was much closer: 202-216, with 29 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
These amendments, which merely reaffirm the warmaking powers of the Congress under the U.S. Constitution, would have passed if most Democrats voted yes. So who were the Democrats who voted no?
Let's start with the Andrews amendment, on the theory that the narrower amendment gives you a sharper read on who the problem kids are.
Democrats voting no on the Andrews amendment were: Ackerman, Altmire, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Bishop (GA), Boren, Boyd (FL), Carney, Cramer, Cuellar, Donnelly, Herseth Sandlin, Holden, Klein (FL), Lampson, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Melancon, Mitchell, Murtha, Rothman, Salazar, Schwartz, Scott (GA), Sherman, Shuler, Space, Tanner.
Murtha?! What's that about? It was Murtha who originally proposed putting a prohibition against an unauthorized attack on Iran in the supplemental. Murtha co-sponsored DeFazio's bill, and a similar one offered by Representative Jones. Why did Murtha vote no?
Democrats voting no on the DeFazio amendment were:
Ackerman, Altmire, Andrews, Baca, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Berman, Bishop (GA), Bordallo, Boren, Boyd (FL), Boyda (KS), Brown (Corrine), Cardoza, Carney, Castor, Cohen, Cooper, Costa, Cramer, Crowley, Cuellar, Davis (AL), Davis (CA), Davis (Lincoln), DeLauro, Dicks, Donnelly, Edwards, Ellsworth, Emanuel, Etheridge, Giffords, Gordon, Harman, Hastings (FL), Herseth Sandlin, Higgins, Hill, Hinojosa, Hodes, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, Kanjorski, Klein (FL), Lampson, Lantos, Larsen (WA), Levin, Lipinski, Lowey, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Matheson, McCarthy (NY), McIntyre, Meek (FL), Melancon, Miller (NC), Mitchell, Mollohan, Moore (KS), Murphy (Patrick), Murtha, Ortiz, Perlmutter, Pomeroy, Reyes, Rodriguez, Ross, Ruppersberger, Salazar, Sanchez (Loretta), Sarbanes, Schiff, Scott (GA), Sestak, Shea-Porter, Sherman, Shuler, Skelton, Smith (WA), Snyder, Space, Spratt, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Towns, Udall (CO), Van Hollen, Walz (MN), Wasserman Schultz, Waxman, Weiner, Wexler, Wilson (OH).
Murtha also voted against the DeFazio amendment. As I noted last week, Barrow, Berkley, Berman, Cooper, Costa, Hoyer, Lipinski, Ruppersberger, Scott, and Udall voted against the McGovern bill to withdraw from Iraq even though they represent districts that voted for Kerry in 2004.
Jefferson is a member of the Out of Iraq Caucus and co-sponsored a bill against attacking Iran offered by Representative Lee. Andrews and Brown (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted against the DeFazio amendment even though they co-sponsored DeFazio's bill. Towns (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted no although he co-sponsored a similar bill offered by Representative Jones. That information is recorded here.
Tauscher has been targeted by Working for Us for not supporting a Democratic agenda, as The Nation has reported. (Cuellar is also mentioned in this article.)
Thank and spank, praise and punish, as they say. MoveOn is running radio ads expressing disappointment with Hoyer and Senator Levin for undermining Democratic efforts to end the Iraq war. Send your Representative a note to let him or her know what you think about their votes.
Robert Naiman is Senior Policy Analyst and National Coordinator at Just Foreign Policy.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Robert Naiman
Robert Naiman is Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy. Naiman has worked as a policy analyst and researcher at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch. He has masters degrees in economics and mathematics from the University of Illinois and has studied and worked in the Middle East.
On Wednesday, the House voted on two amendments to the defense authorization bill that would have restricted the ability of the Bush Administration to launch an attack on Iran.
An amendment introduced by Reps. DeFazio, Paul, Hinchey, and Lee would have explicitly blocked military action against Iran without Congressional authorization. I say "explicitly" because under the Constitution, of course, Congress has the sole power to declare war.
But as the amendment authors have noted, Bush Administration officials have tried to claim that the Bush Administration has the authority to attack Iran without Congressional authorization.
The amendment failed 136-288, with 100 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
A narrower amendment offered by Rep. Andrews would have prevented funds authorized in the bill for the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan from being obligated or expended to plan a contingency operation in Iran. This amendment also failed, but the vote was much closer: 202-216, with 29 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
These amendments, which merely reaffirm the warmaking powers of the Congress under the U.S. Constitution, would have passed if most Democrats voted yes. So who were the Democrats who voted no?
Let's start with the Andrews amendment, on the theory that the narrower amendment gives you a sharper read on who the problem kids are.
Democrats voting no on the Andrews amendment were: Ackerman, Altmire, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Bishop (GA), Boren, Boyd (FL), Carney, Cramer, Cuellar, Donnelly, Herseth Sandlin, Holden, Klein (FL), Lampson, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Melancon, Mitchell, Murtha, Rothman, Salazar, Schwartz, Scott (GA), Sherman, Shuler, Space, Tanner.
Murtha?! What's that about? It was Murtha who originally proposed putting a prohibition against an unauthorized attack on Iran in the supplemental. Murtha co-sponsored DeFazio's bill, and a similar one offered by Representative Jones. Why did Murtha vote no?
Democrats voting no on the DeFazio amendment were:
Ackerman, Altmire, Andrews, Baca, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Berman, Bishop (GA), Bordallo, Boren, Boyd (FL), Boyda (KS), Brown (Corrine), Cardoza, Carney, Castor, Cohen, Cooper, Costa, Cramer, Crowley, Cuellar, Davis (AL), Davis (CA), Davis (Lincoln), DeLauro, Dicks, Donnelly, Edwards, Ellsworth, Emanuel, Etheridge, Giffords, Gordon, Harman, Hastings (FL), Herseth Sandlin, Higgins, Hill, Hinojosa, Hodes, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, Kanjorski, Klein (FL), Lampson, Lantos, Larsen (WA), Levin, Lipinski, Lowey, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Matheson, McCarthy (NY), McIntyre, Meek (FL), Melancon, Miller (NC), Mitchell, Mollohan, Moore (KS), Murphy (Patrick), Murtha, Ortiz, Perlmutter, Pomeroy, Reyes, Rodriguez, Ross, Ruppersberger, Salazar, Sanchez (Loretta), Sarbanes, Schiff, Scott (GA), Sestak, Shea-Porter, Sherman, Shuler, Skelton, Smith (WA), Snyder, Space, Spratt, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Towns, Udall (CO), Van Hollen, Walz (MN), Wasserman Schultz, Waxman, Weiner, Wexler, Wilson (OH).
Murtha also voted against the DeFazio amendment. As I noted last week, Barrow, Berkley, Berman, Cooper, Costa, Hoyer, Lipinski, Ruppersberger, Scott, and Udall voted against the McGovern bill to withdraw from Iraq even though they represent districts that voted for Kerry in 2004.
Jefferson is a member of the Out of Iraq Caucus and co-sponsored a bill against attacking Iran offered by Representative Lee. Andrews and Brown (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted against the DeFazio amendment even though they co-sponsored DeFazio's bill. Towns (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted no although he co-sponsored a similar bill offered by Representative Jones. That information is recorded here.
Tauscher has been targeted by Working for Us for not supporting a Democratic agenda, as The Nation has reported. (Cuellar is also mentioned in this article.)
Thank and spank, praise and punish, as they say. MoveOn is running radio ads expressing disappointment with Hoyer and Senator Levin for undermining Democratic efforts to end the Iraq war. Send your Representative a note to let him or her know what you think about their votes.
Robert Naiman is Senior Policy Analyst and National Coordinator at Just Foreign Policy.
Robert Naiman
Robert Naiman is Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy. Naiman has worked as a policy analyst and researcher at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch. He has masters degrees in economics and mathematics from the University of Illinois and has studied and worked in the Middle East.
On Wednesday, the House voted on two amendments to the defense authorization bill that would have restricted the ability of the Bush Administration to launch an attack on Iran.
An amendment introduced by Reps. DeFazio, Paul, Hinchey, and Lee would have explicitly blocked military action against Iran without Congressional authorization. I say "explicitly" because under the Constitution, of course, Congress has the sole power to declare war.
But as the amendment authors have noted, Bush Administration officials have tried to claim that the Bush Administration has the authority to attack Iran without Congressional authorization.
The amendment failed 136-288, with 100 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
A narrower amendment offered by Rep. Andrews would have prevented funds authorized in the bill for the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan from being obligated or expended to plan a contingency operation in Iran. This amendment also failed, but the vote was much closer: 202-216, with 29 Democrats voting no. The roll call is here.
These amendments, which merely reaffirm the warmaking powers of the Congress under the U.S. Constitution, would have passed if most Democrats voted yes. So who were the Democrats who voted no?
Let's start with the Andrews amendment, on the theory that the narrower amendment gives you a sharper read on who the problem kids are.
Democrats voting no on the Andrews amendment were: Ackerman, Altmire, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Bishop (GA), Boren, Boyd (FL), Carney, Cramer, Cuellar, Donnelly, Herseth Sandlin, Holden, Klein (FL), Lampson, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Melancon, Mitchell, Murtha, Rothman, Salazar, Schwartz, Scott (GA), Sherman, Shuler, Space, Tanner.
Murtha?! What's that about? It was Murtha who originally proposed putting a prohibition against an unauthorized attack on Iran in the supplemental. Murtha co-sponsored DeFazio's bill, and a similar one offered by Representative Jones. Why did Murtha vote no?
Democrats voting no on the DeFazio amendment were:
Ackerman, Altmire, Andrews, Baca, Barrow, Bean, Berkley, Berman, Bishop (GA), Bordallo, Boren, Boyd (FL), Boyda (KS), Brown (Corrine), Cardoza, Carney, Castor, Cohen, Cooper, Costa, Cramer, Crowley, Cuellar, Davis (AL), Davis (CA), Davis (Lincoln), DeLauro, Dicks, Donnelly, Edwards, Ellsworth, Emanuel, Etheridge, Giffords, Gordon, Harman, Hastings (FL), Herseth Sandlin, Higgins, Hill, Hinojosa, Hodes, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, Kanjorski, Klein (FL), Lampson, Lantos, Larsen (WA), Levin, Lipinski, Lowey, Mahoney (FL), Marshall, Matheson, McCarthy (NY), McIntyre, Meek (FL), Melancon, Miller (NC), Mitchell, Mollohan, Moore (KS), Murphy (Patrick), Murtha, Ortiz, Perlmutter, Pomeroy, Reyes, Rodriguez, Ross, Ruppersberger, Salazar, Sanchez (Loretta), Sarbanes, Schiff, Scott (GA), Sestak, Shea-Porter, Sherman, Shuler, Skelton, Smith (WA), Snyder, Space, Spratt, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Towns, Udall (CO), Van Hollen, Walz (MN), Wasserman Schultz, Waxman, Weiner, Wexler, Wilson (OH).
Murtha also voted against the DeFazio amendment. As I noted last week, Barrow, Berkley, Berman, Cooper, Costa, Hoyer, Lipinski, Ruppersberger, Scott, and Udall voted against the McGovern bill to withdraw from Iraq even though they represent districts that voted for Kerry in 2004.
Jefferson is a member of the Out of Iraq Caucus and co-sponsored a bill against attacking Iran offered by Representative Lee. Andrews and Brown (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted against the DeFazio amendment even though they co-sponsored DeFazio's bill. Towns (Out of Iraq Caucus) voted no although he co-sponsored a similar bill offered by Representative Jones. That information is recorded here.
Tauscher has been targeted by Working for Us for not supporting a Democratic agenda, as The Nation has reported. (Cuellar is also mentioned in this article.)
Thank and spank, praise and punish, as they say. MoveOn is running radio ads expressing disappointment with Hoyer and Senator Levin for undermining Democratic efforts to end the Iraq war. Send your Representative a note to let him or her know what you think about their votes.
Robert Naiman is Senior Policy Analyst and National Coordinator at Just Foreign Policy.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.