Nov 03, 2006
WASHINGTON - The war in Iraq is the issue in the critical Nov.7 election -- and it should be.
Voters surely will want to have a say on the national policy that has taken a huge human toll of casualties, both American and Iraqi, and is draining the U.S. Treasury.
Although they are not on the ballot, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are running scared, with Bush warning that the Democratic approach means that "the terrorists win and America loses."
It's a rare opportunity to weigh in on the nation's foreign policy and to send a message to the president who led the country into an unnecessary war.
This is also a chance for the voters to assess the political fate of the do-nothing rubber-stamp Congress, where lawmakers failed to question the president's motives in creating the Iraqi disaster.
The majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill went along with the October 2002 resolution that the administration took as the go-ahead for the invasion and occupation of the oil-rich country.
Democrats can't complain, but they can see the light and change their minds. They might even be able to propose an exit date and escape being accused by GOP opponents of not supporting the troops -- despite Bush's desperate rhetoric -- since some Republicans are looking for a way out of the quagmire, too.
Other Republican candidates seem to be shying away from the war issue as they put some distance between themselves and Bush. Many aren't eager for the traditional side-by-side public appearances with the president.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said last week that Republican candidates should steer clear of the war in Iraq and get Americans focusing on pocketbook issues.
Not all are taking that advice.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., said in a recent column in the Christian Science Monitor that although "the struggle (meaning the war) is incredibly difficult, the Republican approach is working for America."
Karl Rove, White House political adviser, has been urging party candidates to stick with the tried-and-true emphasis on national security and the war on terrorism, promising it would play well at the polls.
The president also has thrown in a last-minute diatribe against gay marriage.
To take over Capitol Hill and turn Bush into a real lame duck, Democrats need to win 15 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In a midterm correction to help beleaguered Republican candidates, Bush has now rejected the slogan "stay the course" that he and his top advisers had used to flay the Democrats, whom they accused of wanting to "cut and run."
The administration also has been talking loudly about benchmarks and timetables to assure voters that there is some movement toward an Iraq exit strategy.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki denies there is any deal on timing of withdrawal of American troops and dismissed such talk as a campaign ploy for U.S. domestic consumption.
Bush told ABC-TV's George Stephanopoulos on "This Week" on Oct. 22: "We've never been 'stay the course,' " a claim that smoothly ignored repeated statements by the president and other administration officials over the past three years.
The election is not only a referendum on the war but also on the administration's waning credibility.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Helen Thomas
Helen Thomas was an American author and former news service reporter, member of the White House Press Corps and columnist. She worked for the United Press International (UPI) for 57 years, first as a correspondent, and later as White House bureau chief. She was an opinion columnist for Hearst Newspapers from 2000 to 2010, writing on national affairs and the White House. Among other books, she was the author of "Front Row at The White House: My Life and Times" (2000) and "Watchdogs of Democracy?: The Waning Washington Press Corps and How It Has Failed the Public" (2007). Helen passed away on July 20, 2013.
WASHINGTON - The war in Iraq is the issue in the critical Nov.7 election -- and it should be.
Voters surely will want to have a say on the national policy that has taken a huge human toll of casualties, both American and Iraqi, and is draining the U.S. Treasury.
Although they are not on the ballot, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are running scared, with Bush warning that the Democratic approach means that "the terrorists win and America loses."
It's a rare opportunity to weigh in on the nation's foreign policy and to send a message to the president who led the country into an unnecessary war.
This is also a chance for the voters to assess the political fate of the do-nothing rubber-stamp Congress, where lawmakers failed to question the president's motives in creating the Iraqi disaster.
The majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill went along with the October 2002 resolution that the administration took as the go-ahead for the invasion and occupation of the oil-rich country.
Democrats can't complain, but they can see the light and change their minds. They might even be able to propose an exit date and escape being accused by GOP opponents of not supporting the troops -- despite Bush's desperate rhetoric -- since some Republicans are looking for a way out of the quagmire, too.
Other Republican candidates seem to be shying away from the war issue as they put some distance between themselves and Bush. Many aren't eager for the traditional side-by-side public appearances with the president.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said last week that Republican candidates should steer clear of the war in Iraq and get Americans focusing on pocketbook issues.
Not all are taking that advice.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., said in a recent column in the Christian Science Monitor that although "the struggle (meaning the war) is incredibly difficult, the Republican approach is working for America."
Karl Rove, White House political adviser, has been urging party candidates to stick with the tried-and-true emphasis on national security and the war on terrorism, promising it would play well at the polls.
The president also has thrown in a last-minute diatribe against gay marriage.
To take over Capitol Hill and turn Bush into a real lame duck, Democrats need to win 15 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In a midterm correction to help beleaguered Republican candidates, Bush has now rejected the slogan "stay the course" that he and his top advisers had used to flay the Democrats, whom they accused of wanting to "cut and run."
The administration also has been talking loudly about benchmarks and timetables to assure voters that there is some movement toward an Iraq exit strategy.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki denies there is any deal on timing of withdrawal of American troops and dismissed such talk as a campaign ploy for U.S. domestic consumption.
Bush told ABC-TV's George Stephanopoulos on "This Week" on Oct. 22: "We've never been 'stay the course,' " a claim that smoothly ignored repeated statements by the president and other administration officials over the past three years.
The election is not only a referendum on the war but also on the administration's waning credibility.
Helen Thomas
Helen Thomas was an American author and former news service reporter, member of the White House Press Corps and columnist. She worked for the United Press International (UPI) for 57 years, first as a correspondent, and later as White House bureau chief. She was an opinion columnist for Hearst Newspapers from 2000 to 2010, writing on national affairs and the White House. Among other books, she was the author of "Front Row at The White House: My Life and Times" (2000) and "Watchdogs of Democracy?: The Waning Washington Press Corps and How It Has Failed the Public" (2007). Helen passed away on July 20, 2013.
WASHINGTON - The war in Iraq is the issue in the critical Nov.7 election -- and it should be.
Voters surely will want to have a say on the national policy that has taken a huge human toll of casualties, both American and Iraqi, and is draining the U.S. Treasury.
Although they are not on the ballot, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are running scared, with Bush warning that the Democratic approach means that "the terrorists win and America loses."
It's a rare opportunity to weigh in on the nation's foreign policy and to send a message to the president who led the country into an unnecessary war.
This is also a chance for the voters to assess the political fate of the do-nothing rubber-stamp Congress, where lawmakers failed to question the president's motives in creating the Iraqi disaster.
The majority of Democrats on Capitol Hill went along with the October 2002 resolution that the administration took as the go-ahead for the invasion and occupation of the oil-rich country.
Democrats can't complain, but they can see the light and change their minds. They might even be able to propose an exit date and escape being accused by GOP opponents of not supporting the troops -- despite Bush's desperate rhetoric -- since some Republicans are looking for a way out of the quagmire, too.
Other Republican candidates seem to be shying away from the war issue as they put some distance between themselves and Bush. Many aren't eager for the traditional side-by-side public appearances with the president.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said last week that Republican candidates should steer clear of the war in Iraq and get Americans focusing on pocketbook issues.
Not all are taking that advice.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., said in a recent column in the Christian Science Monitor that although "the struggle (meaning the war) is incredibly difficult, the Republican approach is working for America."
Karl Rove, White House political adviser, has been urging party candidates to stick with the tried-and-true emphasis on national security and the war on terrorism, promising it would play well at the polls.
The president also has thrown in a last-minute diatribe against gay marriage.
To take over Capitol Hill and turn Bush into a real lame duck, Democrats need to win 15 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In a midterm correction to help beleaguered Republican candidates, Bush has now rejected the slogan "stay the course" that he and his top advisers had used to flay the Democrats, whom they accused of wanting to "cut and run."
The administration also has been talking loudly about benchmarks and timetables to assure voters that there is some movement toward an Iraq exit strategy.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki denies there is any deal on timing of withdrawal of American troops and dismissed such talk as a campaign ploy for U.S. domestic consumption.
Bush told ABC-TV's George Stephanopoulos on "This Week" on Oct. 22: "We've never been 'stay the course,' " a claim that smoothly ignored repeated statements by the president and other administration officials over the past three years.
The election is not only a referendum on the war but also on the administration's waning credibility.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.