

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
You can't pick up your newspaper, listen to your radio or turn on your television set these days without being confronted by a deeply earnest George W. Bush telling you how well the war in Iraq is going. It's reached the point where I'm afraid to open my closet door for fear he might pop out, ready to make his pitch.
Oh, he made a few mistakes at the beginning, he'll tell you, but basically the war was a swell idea and it's working out and he'd do it again if he had the chance. He even took his act out on the road to audiences that were not pre-selected for servile adulation, a first for him.
It's been a whirlwind performance, particularly from a president who is famous for never admitting mistakes or explaining what he's doing.
"My conviction comes down to this," he said. "We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them....
"And I have never been more certain that America's actions in Iraq are essential to the security of our citizens, and will lay the foundation of peace for our children and grandchildren."
It was miles ahead of any other speech he's given on Iraq. Not that I buy it, you understand, but when a president looks straight into the camera and forcefully defends his policy in terms of good and evil, well, he's pretty hard to beat.
Predictably, his approval rating in the "Washington Post"-ABC poll shot up to 47 percent from a low of 39 a month before.
Apparently, he's putting great store in the results of the recent Iraqi election, which he called "a landmark day in the history of liberty."
Which it could well be, I suppose, but it seems to me that when you're talking about the Middle East, you have to be careful what you wish for.
The most likely outcome of a democratic Iraq is a repressive, fundamentalist Islamic government with little respect for the rights of minorities and none for the rights of women. One, moreover, that is eager to fall into the welcoming arms of its Shiite neighbor, Iran, which hates our guts and is working to develop nuclear weapons. And if the Iraqi Shiite majority is reluctant to share oil revenues with their former overlords, the Sunni, you have the recipe for civil war.
But the real nightmare scenario is that Iraq, once we leave, becomes the new Afghanistan, a safe haven and training ground for terrorists who seek to destroy us at home and abroad.
For this, we've spent $200 billion to $300 billion, suffered 2,158 dead (and counting) and God knows how many thousands maimed?
I don't see that as a good bargain. The Iraq election was a start and a good one, but only a start. We have a long way to go in Iraq and the odds are against us.
But this is the holiday (Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, etc.) season, time to focus on good news. For example:
A federal judge in Pennsylvania struck down a Dover, Pa., school board rule that required teachers to tell students that evolution was a flawed theory and that there were alternative explanations of humankind's beginnings, "Intelligent Design" for one.
The mildest of intrusions into the classroom, you would think, but Judge John E. Jones got right to the heart of things:
"We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom, in violation of the Establishment Clause.
"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID (Intelligent Design) is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism and not a scientific theory."
The judge, a Bush appointee, didn't say you couldn't teach Intelligent Design in school, merely that you couldn't teach it in a science class. It was a blow struck for common sense and clear thinking.
Which, in these dismal days, qualifies as good news indeed.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
You can't pick up your newspaper, listen to your radio or turn on your television set these days without being confronted by a deeply earnest George W. Bush telling you how well the war in Iraq is going. It's reached the point where I'm afraid to open my closet door for fear he might pop out, ready to make his pitch.
Oh, he made a few mistakes at the beginning, he'll tell you, but basically the war was a swell idea and it's working out and he'd do it again if he had the chance. He even took his act out on the road to audiences that were not pre-selected for servile adulation, a first for him.
It's been a whirlwind performance, particularly from a president who is famous for never admitting mistakes or explaining what he's doing.
"My conviction comes down to this," he said. "We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them....
"And I have never been more certain that America's actions in Iraq are essential to the security of our citizens, and will lay the foundation of peace for our children and grandchildren."
It was miles ahead of any other speech he's given on Iraq. Not that I buy it, you understand, but when a president looks straight into the camera and forcefully defends his policy in terms of good and evil, well, he's pretty hard to beat.
Predictably, his approval rating in the "Washington Post"-ABC poll shot up to 47 percent from a low of 39 a month before.
Apparently, he's putting great store in the results of the recent Iraqi election, which he called "a landmark day in the history of liberty."
Which it could well be, I suppose, but it seems to me that when you're talking about the Middle East, you have to be careful what you wish for.
The most likely outcome of a democratic Iraq is a repressive, fundamentalist Islamic government with little respect for the rights of minorities and none for the rights of women. One, moreover, that is eager to fall into the welcoming arms of its Shiite neighbor, Iran, which hates our guts and is working to develop nuclear weapons. And if the Iraqi Shiite majority is reluctant to share oil revenues with their former overlords, the Sunni, you have the recipe for civil war.
But the real nightmare scenario is that Iraq, once we leave, becomes the new Afghanistan, a safe haven and training ground for terrorists who seek to destroy us at home and abroad.
For this, we've spent $200 billion to $300 billion, suffered 2,158 dead (and counting) and God knows how many thousands maimed?
I don't see that as a good bargain. The Iraq election was a start and a good one, but only a start. We have a long way to go in Iraq and the odds are against us.
But this is the holiday (Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, etc.) season, time to focus on good news. For example:
A federal judge in Pennsylvania struck down a Dover, Pa., school board rule that required teachers to tell students that evolution was a flawed theory and that there were alternative explanations of humankind's beginnings, "Intelligent Design" for one.
The mildest of intrusions into the classroom, you would think, but Judge John E. Jones got right to the heart of things:
"We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom, in violation of the Establishment Clause.
"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID (Intelligent Design) is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism and not a scientific theory."
The judge, a Bush appointee, didn't say you couldn't teach Intelligent Design in school, merely that you couldn't teach it in a science class. It was a blow struck for common sense and clear thinking.
Which, in these dismal days, qualifies as good news indeed.
You can't pick up your newspaper, listen to your radio or turn on your television set these days without being confronted by a deeply earnest George W. Bush telling you how well the war in Iraq is going. It's reached the point where I'm afraid to open my closet door for fear he might pop out, ready to make his pitch.
Oh, he made a few mistakes at the beginning, he'll tell you, but basically the war was a swell idea and it's working out and he'd do it again if he had the chance. He even took his act out on the road to audiences that were not pre-selected for servile adulation, a first for him.
It's been a whirlwind performance, particularly from a president who is famous for never admitting mistakes or explaining what he's doing.
"My conviction comes down to this," he said. "We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them....
"And I have never been more certain that America's actions in Iraq are essential to the security of our citizens, and will lay the foundation of peace for our children and grandchildren."
It was miles ahead of any other speech he's given on Iraq. Not that I buy it, you understand, but when a president looks straight into the camera and forcefully defends his policy in terms of good and evil, well, he's pretty hard to beat.
Predictably, his approval rating in the "Washington Post"-ABC poll shot up to 47 percent from a low of 39 a month before.
Apparently, he's putting great store in the results of the recent Iraqi election, which he called "a landmark day in the history of liberty."
Which it could well be, I suppose, but it seems to me that when you're talking about the Middle East, you have to be careful what you wish for.
The most likely outcome of a democratic Iraq is a repressive, fundamentalist Islamic government with little respect for the rights of minorities and none for the rights of women. One, moreover, that is eager to fall into the welcoming arms of its Shiite neighbor, Iran, which hates our guts and is working to develop nuclear weapons. And if the Iraqi Shiite majority is reluctant to share oil revenues with their former overlords, the Sunni, you have the recipe for civil war.
But the real nightmare scenario is that Iraq, once we leave, becomes the new Afghanistan, a safe haven and training ground for terrorists who seek to destroy us at home and abroad.
For this, we've spent $200 billion to $300 billion, suffered 2,158 dead (and counting) and God knows how many thousands maimed?
I don't see that as a good bargain. The Iraq election was a start and a good one, but only a start. We have a long way to go in Iraq and the odds are against us.
But this is the holiday (Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, etc.) season, time to focus on good news. For example:
A federal judge in Pennsylvania struck down a Dover, Pa., school board rule that required teachers to tell students that evolution was a flawed theory and that there were alternative explanations of humankind's beginnings, "Intelligent Design" for one.
The mildest of intrusions into the classroom, you would think, but Judge John E. Jones got right to the heart of things:
"We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom, in violation of the Establishment Clause.
"The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID (Intelligent Design) is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism and not a scientific theory."
The judge, a Bush appointee, didn't say you couldn't teach Intelligent Design in school, merely that you couldn't teach it in a science class. It was a blow struck for common sense and clear thinking.
Which, in these dismal days, qualifies as good news indeed.