The Citizen and the Publisher
This is what separated us from you; we made demands. You were satisfied to serve the power of the nation and we dreamed of giving ours her truth.
-- Albert Camus, 'Letters to a German Friend'
Earlier this month, Janis Besler Heaphy, publisher and president of the Sacramento Bee, gave a commencement speech at California State University at Sacramento that was fitting of a true patriot and all that it means to be an American: "The terrorist attacks awakened a sense of patriotism long dormant in this country. We have been reminded of our greatness and how lucky we are to be Americans. But that blessing comes with responsibilities." That responsibility, illustrated in her remarks before she was booed off stage, is to ask the questions and serve the citizenry, however difficult those questions are to ask or however much they may disagree with official government policy. We may never know the motivations of those who shouted and stomped. Perhaps there was a mix of those put off by her questioning the erosion of civil liberties in a time of war--and others who thought she 'rained' on their day to shine. My country, right or wrong, meets the world is your oyster. Whatever the cause, it's the consequence of their actions that brought the university and the publisher a certain amount of fame and fallout. What it brought us as citizens was a textbook example of our democracy at work. It is Heaphy's act of dissent, her willingness to question those who derive their power from the consent of the governed, to dissent in a public setting, and on a campus university, that deserves our congratulations.
How many of us since September 11 have noticed examples of where distinctions between official policy in Washington and personal opinion have all but disappeared? In such an atmosphere, no official mandate of censorship is required. We self-censor remarks, internalize our difference of opinion, and throw our ideals--for a world without war and all forms of violence--out the window marked "unsound."
Then along comes someone like Janis Besler Heaphy, newspaper publisher. Who would have thought that a university commencement address would generate more than its usual polite applause and "let's get this over with" feeling among the crowd. Heaphy's speech reiterated what we already know: citizens in a democracy need information in order to provide informed consent to those who serve us. And a free and vigorous press is the best vehicle to fight for the whole story, not just what official Washington wants us to know. If the citizenry of the United States does not want the whole story, only parts of it that favor 'our side' in a war, then we shouldn't be surprised if journalists and newspaper publishers stop asking the questions.
Luckily for us, Heaphy remembered who she was.
We live in a time of great sensitivity and a wish not to hurt feelings. Emotions are running high and sentimentality reigns. In time, we will look back at Janis Besler Heaphy's Commencement Address as the highest mark of a public servant, who, like the true patriot, is one who shows a higher loyalty to the country it can be than to a country that it is. Heaphy may have been stung by how some received her speech in the moment of its making, but in the long run she will have strengthened our values as a citizenry and the proper role of the university. Read her speech, without interruption, and see the duty and beauty in asking questions.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This is what separated us from you; we made demands. You were satisfied to serve the power of the nation and we dreamed of giving ours her truth.
-- Albert Camus, 'Letters to a German Friend'
Earlier this month, Janis Besler Heaphy, publisher and president of the Sacramento Bee, gave a commencement speech at California State University at Sacramento that was fitting of a true patriot and all that it means to be an American: "The terrorist attacks awakened a sense of patriotism long dormant in this country. We have been reminded of our greatness and how lucky we are to be Americans. But that blessing comes with responsibilities." That responsibility, illustrated in her remarks before she was booed off stage, is to ask the questions and serve the citizenry, however difficult those questions are to ask or however much they may disagree with official government policy. We may never know the motivations of those who shouted and stomped. Perhaps there was a mix of those put off by her questioning the erosion of civil liberties in a time of war--and others who thought she 'rained' on their day to shine. My country, right or wrong, meets the world is your oyster. Whatever the cause, it's the consequence of their actions that brought the university and the publisher a certain amount of fame and fallout. What it brought us as citizens was a textbook example of our democracy at work. It is Heaphy's act of dissent, her willingness to question those who derive their power from the consent of the governed, to dissent in a public setting, and on a campus university, that deserves our congratulations.
How many of us since September 11 have noticed examples of where distinctions between official policy in Washington and personal opinion have all but disappeared? In such an atmosphere, no official mandate of censorship is required. We self-censor remarks, internalize our difference of opinion, and throw our ideals--for a world without war and all forms of violence--out the window marked "unsound."
Then along comes someone like Janis Besler Heaphy, newspaper publisher. Who would have thought that a university commencement address would generate more than its usual polite applause and "let's get this over with" feeling among the crowd. Heaphy's speech reiterated what we already know: citizens in a democracy need information in order to provide informed consent to those who serve us. And a free and vigorous press is the best vehicle to fight for the whole story, not just what official Washington wants us to know. If the citizenry of the United States does not want the whole story, only parts of it that favor 'our side' in a war, then we shouldn't be surprised if journalists and newspaper publishers stop asking the questions.
Luckily for us, Heaphy remembered who she was.
We live in a time of great sensitivity and a wish not to hurt feelings. Emotions are running high and sentimentality reigns. In time, we will look back at Janis Besler Heaphy's Commencement Address as the highest mark of a public servant, who, like the true patriot, is one who shows a higher loyalty to the country it can be than to a country that it is. Heaphy may have been stung by how some received her speech in the moment of its making, but in the long run she will have strengthened our values as a citizenry and the proper role of the university. Read her speech, without interruption, and see the duty and beauty in asking questions.
This is what separated us from you; we made demands. You were satisfied to serve the power of the nation and we dreamed of giving ours her truth.
-- Albert Camus, 'Letters to a German Friend'
Earlier this month, Janis Besler Heaphy, publisher and president of the Sacramento Bee, gave a commencement speech at California State University at Sacramento that was fitting of a true patriot and all that it means to be an American: "The terrorist attacks awakened a sense of patriotism long dormant in this country. We have been reminded of our greatness and how lucky we are to be Americans. But that blessing comes with responsibilities." That responsibility, illustrated in her remarks before she was booed off stage, is to ask the questions and serve the citizenry, however difficult those questions are to ask or however much they may disagree with official government policy. We may never know the motivations of those who shouted and stomped. Perhaps there was a mix of those put off by her questioning the erosion of civil liberties in a time of war--and others who thought she 'rained' on their day to shine. My country, right or wrong, meets the world is your oyster. Whatever the cause, it's the consequence of their actions that brought the university and the publisher a certain amount of fame and fallout. What it brought us as citizens was a textbook example of our democracy at work. It is Heaphy's act of dissent, her willingness to question those who derive their power from the consent of the governed, to dissent in a public setting, and on a campus university, that deserves our congratulations.
How many of us since September 11 have noticed examples of where distinctions between official policy in Washington and personal opinion have all but disappeared? In such an atmosphere, no official mandate of censorship is required. We self-censor remarks, internalize our difference of opinion, and throw our ideals--for a world without war and all forms of violence--out the window marked "unsound."
Then along comes someone like Janis Besler Heaphy, newspaper publisher. Who would have thought that a university commencement address would generate more than its usual polite applause and "let's get this over with" feeling among the crowd. Heaphy's speech reiterated what we already know: citizens in a democracy need information in order to provide informed consent to those who serve us. And a free and vigorous press is the best vehicle to fight for the whole story, not just what official Washington wants us to know. If the citizenry of the United States does not want the whole story, only parts of it that favor 'our side' in a war, then we shouldn't be surprised if journalists and newspaper publishers stop asking the questions.
Luckily for us, Heaphy remembered who she was.
We live in a time of great sensitivity and a wish not to hurt feelings. Emotions are running high and sentimentality reigns. In time, we will look back at Janis Besler Heaphy's Commencement Address as the highest mark of a public servant, who, like the true patriot, is one who shows a higher loyalty to the country it can be than to a country that it is. Heaphy may have been stung by how some received her speech in the moment of its making, but in the long run she will have strengthened our values as a citizenry and the proper role of the university. Read her speech, without interruption, and see the duty and beauty in asking questions.