Is It a 'Hood or Verging on Good?
Last Tuesday they were celebrating Inglewood's finest hour in more than a decade: the "grand opening" of a revitalized Market Street, the main downtown thoroughfare. The band was playing, the balloons were swaying and the flowering jacaranda trees were framing a picture of a city on the verge of a renewed civic identity.
Inglewood, City of Champions, put out the welcome mat to show off its $3.6-million renovation effort and illustrate its urban vitality. Mayor Roosevelt Dorn said there's "something good in Inglewood." Now if they could only let the "perception managers" know about it.
What does a city do when outside perceptions cloud its reality? Is it Inglewood or "Inglehood," Inglewood or "Ingle Watts"? As one who lives in the adjacent L.A. neighborhood of Westchester, I've been met with puzzled looks and wide-eyed stares at my residence location. My safety is the immediate concern. If my address were Bel-Air, Brentwood, Westwood or Beverly Hills-adjacent, would safety be the topic of conversation? I've tested the theory, and the other locations lead to excited conversations about where to shop, eat or do business.
In his book, "Public Opinion," journalist Walter Lippmann wrote: "We do not first see, and then define, we define first and then see." In other words, distorting reality is part of the human condition, and it is the "pictures in our heads" that determine reality.
The pictures in our heads in Los Angeles and its surrounding communities are of two cities--one of "neighbor-hoods," the other of neighborhoods. One type of neighborhood is deserving of our attention, our dollars and our investments--places overwhelmingly white and affluent. These are the neighborhoods and communities that are desirable, so much so that even if you aren't lucky enough to live there, you describe your neighborhood as XYZ-adjacent.
The other Los Angeles holds neighborhoods that are better off left alone, not to be experienced firsthand lest you become a victim to its unpredictable cast. These neighborhoods are overwhelmingly African American and Latino, generally less newsworthy and less visible in the business and economic buzz circles, but very visible in those pictures in our heads. Those pictures are often mediated, housed in the Metro sections of newspapers telling us about yet another disaster over there--another sad shooting or tragic mishap that triggers the Pavlovian head nod and the reminder to check our gas gauges if we're ever adjacent to these areas.
Where one person sees a "hood," others see a neighborhood. Where one person sees a city on the verge of revitalization and ripe for community development, others see a city on a desperate or futile path to redefine itself.
When Lippmann published "Public Opinion" in 1922, we had no mass media like today. Even then, he wrote that we live in a world that is constructed by what others tell us--through stories, pictures and newspaper accounts. No one has the ability to directly experience the dramatic accounts we're told or read about, so we must experience them second-hand, through the prism of others' interpretation.
Today's mass media, and individual journalists and reporters, are our prism for the most part. They have an enormous responsibility to tell stories that reflect the reality, and not just the pseudo-reality, of places. Without these stories, our city of Los Angeles will remain divided between neighborhoods and communities deserving of our time and money and those that are not.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last Tuesday they were celebrating Inglewood's finest hour in more than a decade: the "grand opening" of a revitalized Market Street, the main downtown thoroughfare. The band was playing, the balloons were swaying and the flowering jacaranda trees were framing a picture of a city on the verge of a renewed civic identity.
Inglewood, City of Champions, put out the welcome mat to show off its $3.6-million renovation effort and illustrate its urban vitality. Mayor Roosevelt Dorn said there's "something good in Inglewood." Now if they could only let the "perception managers" know about it.
What does a city do when outside perceptions cloud its reality? Is it Inglewood or "Inglehood," Inglewood or "Ingle Watts"? As one who lives in the adjacent L.A. neighborhood of Westchester, I've been met with puzzled looks and wide-eyed stares at my residence location. My safety is the immediate concern. If my address were Bel-Air, Brentwood, Westwood or Beverly Hills-adjacent, would safety be the topic of conversation? I've tested the theory, and the other locations lead to excited conversations about where to shop, eat or do business.
In his book, "Public Opinion," journalist Walter Lippmann wrote: "We do not first see, and then define, we define first and then see." In other words, distorting reality is part of the human condition, and it is the "pictures in our heads" that determine reality.
The pictures in our heads in Los Angeles and its surrounding communities are of two cities--one of "neighbor-hoods," the other of neighborhoods. One type of neighborhood is deserving of our attention, our dollars and our investments--places overwhelmingly white and affluent. These are the neighborhoods and communities that are desirable, so much so that even if you aren't lucky enough to live there, you describe your neighborhood as XYZ-adjacent.
The other Los Angeles holds neighborhoods that are better off left alone, not to be experienced firsthand lest you become a victim to its unpredictable cast. These neighborhoods are overwhelmingly African American and Latino, generally less newsworthy and less visible in the business and economic buzz circles, but very visible in those pictures in our heads. Those pictures are often mediated, housed in the Metro sections of newspapers telling us about yet another disaster over there--another sad shooting or tragic mishap that triggers the Pavlovian head nod and the reminder to check our gas gauges if we're ever adjacent to these areas.
Where one person sees a "hood," others see a neighborhood. Where one person sees a city on the verge of revitalization and ripe for community development, others see a city on a desperate or futile path to redefine itself.
When Lippmann published "Public Opinion" in 1922, we had no mass media like today. Even then, he wrote that we live in a world that is constructed by what others tell us--through stories, pictures and newspaper accounts. No one has the ability to directly experience the dramatic accounts we're told or read about, so we must experience them second-hand, through the prism of others' interpretation.
Today's mass media, and individual journalists and reporters, are our prism for the most part. They have an enormous responsibility to tell stories that reflect the reality, and not just the pseudo-reality, of places. Without these stories, our city of Los Angeles will remain divided between neighborhoods and communities deserving of our time and money and those that are not.
Last Tuesday they were celebrating Inglewood's finest hour in more than a decade: the "grand opening" of a revitalized Market Street, the main downtown thoroughfare. The band was playing, the balloons were swaying and the flowering jacaranda trees were framing a picture of a city on the verge of a renewed civic identity.
Inglewood, City of Champions, put out the welcome mat to show off its $3.6-million renovation effort and illustrate its urban vitality. Mayor Roosevelt Dorn said there's "something good in Inglewood." Now if they could only let the "perception managers" know about it.
What does a city do when outside perceptions cloud its reality? Is it Inglewood or "Inglehood," Inglewood or "Ingle Watts"? As one who lives in the adjacent L.A. neighborhood of Westchester, I've been met with puzzled looks and wide-eyed stares at my residence location. My safety is the immediate concern. If my address were Bel-Air, Brentwood, Westwood or Beverly Hills-adjacent, would safety be the topic of conversation? I've tested the theory, and the other locations lead to excited conversations about where to shop, eat or do business.
In his book, "Public Opinion," journalist Walter Lippmann wrote: "We do not first see, and then define, we define first and then see." In other words, distorting reality is part of the human condition, and it is the "pictures in our heads" that determine reality.
The pictures in our heads in Los Angeles and its surrounding communities are of two cities--one of "neighbor-hoods," the other of neighborhoods. One type of neighborhood is deserving of our attention, our dollars and our investments--places overwhelmingly white and affluent. These are the neighborhoods and communities that are desirable, so much so that even if you aren't lucky enough to live there, you describe your neighborhood as XYZ-adjacent.
The other Los Angeles holds neighborhoods that are better off left alone, not to be experienced firsthand lest you become a victim to its unpredictable cast. These neighborhoods are overwhelmingly African American and Latino, generally less newsworthy and less visible in the business and economic buzz circles, but very visible in those pictures in our heads. Those pictures are often mediated, housed in the Metro sections of newspapers telling us about yet another disaster over there--another sad shooting or tragic mishap that triggers the Pavlovian head nod and the reminder to check our gas gauges if we're ever adjacent to these areas.
Where one person sees a "hood," others see a neighborhood. Where one person sees a city on the verge of revitalization and ripe for community development, others see a city on a desperate or futile path to redefine itself.
When Lippmann published "Public Opinion" in 1922, we had no mass media like today. Even then, he wrote that we live in a world that is constructed by what others tell us--through stories, pictures and newspaper accounts. No one has the ability to directly experience the dramatic accounts we're told or read about, so we must experience them second-hand, through the prism of others' interpretation.
Today's mass media, and individual journalists and reporters, are our prism for the most part. They have an enormous responsibility to tell stories that reflect the reality, and not just the pseudo-reality, of places. Without these stories, our city of Los Angeles will remain divided between neighborhoods and communities deserving of our time and money and those that are not.