

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jews of all ages, including rabbis, students and elders, held mass protests and sit-ins in Congressional offices in 25+ cities across the country in the last two weeks. Tens of thousands demonstrated and almost 1,000 have been arrested.
Jewish people all throughout the United States are protesting in unprecedented numbers against Israel’s destruction of Gaza and the United States’ unwavering support. From Albuquerque to Minneapolis, Seattle to Miami, Washington DC to Detroit, students, elders, faith leaders, and activists, many of whom are affiliated with the group Jewish Voice for Peace, are organizing sit-ins in Congressional offices and blocking streets as they demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
These demonstrations were held in over 25 cities, including Washington D.C., New York City, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, New Orleans, Albuquerque, Denver, Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis, and Miami. This is the largest Jewish mobilization in support of Palestinians in American history, and many people who have never before taken action are pouring into the streets.
“For decades, tens of thousands of Jewish Americans have said that the Israeli government does not represent all Jewish people.
For decades, Jewish Americans have criticized the Israeli occupation of Palestine. American Jews are no longer willing to be silent — they are speaking up louder than ever before and taking to the streets to demand an immediate ceasefire. We will not sit by as a genocide is waged in our name, ” says Liv Kunins-Berkowitz, Media Coordinator for Jewish Voice for Peace. The demonstrations have included peaceful marches and prayerful sit-ins at district Congressional offices and in the Capitol. Protesters across the country sang Jewish peace songs, prayed, chanted, and carried banners saying “Ceasefire Now” and “Never Again.”
In Minneapolis on Oct. 16th, hundreds of Jews demanded that Sen. Klobuchar call for a ceasefire in Gaza. After gathering to pray, the group delivered a letter signed by 300 Minnesotans calling for a ceasefire and humanitarian aid. The protesters carried banners in English and Hebrew with slogans that read, “Every life is sacred.”
On Oct. 17th In Miami, police arrested four Jewish protesters who carried signs that said “Ceasefire Now” while blocking the entrance to Sen. Rick Scott’s office. Dozens more protesters outside held signs saying, “Not in My Name” and “Stop the Genocide of Palestinians.”
In Chicago, on Oct. 23rd, dozens of Jewish people affiliated with Jewish Voice for Peace and If Not Now blocked the streets in front of Sen. Tammy Duckworth and Sen. Dick Durbin’s offices. They held a massive banner that read “Mourn the Dead — Fight Like Hell for the Living” and sang Jewish songs of peace. The Chicago police issued citations to several protesters.
In New Orleans on Oct. 24th, hundreds rallied outside of Rep. Troy Carter’s office as a dozen Jewish Americans wearing shirts that said “Jews for Palestinian Liberation. End the Occupation Now” occupied Rep. Troy Carter’s office building. Speakers at the rally included an Arab Jewish speaker who clearly stated, “Our safety lies in standing with each other. It always has.” Rep. Troy Carter ultimately refused to meet with the protesters and threatened protesters with arrest.
In Philadelphia on Oct. 25th, over thirty people blocked the street in front of Sen. John Fetterman’s Philadelphia office, refusing to move until the Senator announced his support for a ceasefire in Gaza. Protesters were joined by hundreds more in the street, who carried a giant puppet of Fetterman wearing a hoodie reading “Silent on Genocide.” Later that same day, protests were also held outside of Fetterman’s district offices in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, and Wilkes Barre.
Since October 7th, the Israeli government has killed more than 8,000 Palestinian people including over 3,000 children. The United States government gives $3.8 billion in aid to Israel each year and President Biden and many other politicians promise more weapons and more funding to Israel. At the same time, many American members of congress are calling for a ceasefire and are endorsing the Ceasefire Now Resolution, put forth by Rep. Rashida Tlaib and Rep. Cori Bush.
Audio/visuals upon request include: Pictures and video of Jewish people singing, praying, chanting, Pictures and videos of protestors holding signs and banners that say “Ceasefire Now,” “Never Again is Now,” and “Not in Our Name,” Pictures and videos of protestors blocking streets, entrances to congressional offices, chaining themselves together, and getting arrested.
Jewish Voice for Peace is a national, grassroots organization inspired by Jewish tradition to work for a just and lasting peace according to principles of human rights, equality, and international law for all the people of Israel and Palestine. JVP has over 200,000 online supporters, over 70 chapters, a youth wing, a Rabbinic Council, an Artist Council, an Academic Advisory Council, and an Advisory Board made up of leading U.S. intellectuals and artists.
(510) 465-1777“Jeff Bezos is spending $200 billion on AI and robotics. Jeff Bezos is replacing hundreds of thousands of his workers at Amazon with robots. Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post.”
The Washington Post editorial board went to the trouble of marking what it called "Bernie Sanders' worst idea yet" on Wednesday, but the progressive US senator shrugged at the label and didn't appear likely to end his push for a moratorium on the construction of new artificial intelligence data centers.
The conservative-leaning editors wrote glowingly of the "mind-blowing amounts of information" that AI data centers can process and dismissively said that businesses that have invested billions of dollars in AI have erroneously been cast as the "villain in the socialist imagination."
They decried "AI doomerism" by politicians and accused lawmakers like Sanders (I-Vt.) of "fearmongering" about the data centers' water consumption and environmental harms—but neglected to mention that the rapid expansion of the massive centers has sparked grassroots outrage, with communities in states including Michigan and Wisconsin demanding that tech giants stay out of their towns, fearing skyrocketing electricity bills among other impacts.
Sanders emphasized that the Post and its owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, have a vested interest in dismissing efforts to stop the AI build-out that President Donald Trump has demanded with his executive order aimed at stopping states from regulating the industry.
Bezos, one of the richest people on the planet, created an AI startup last year with $6.2 billion in funding, some of it from his personal fortune, and Amazon—where Bezos is still the primary shareholder—has announced plans to invest $200 billion in AI and robotics.
"What a surprise," said Sanders sardonically. "The Washington Post doesn't want a moratorium on AI data centers."
Ben Inskeep, a program director for Citizens Action Coalition in Indiana, suggested the editorial board couldn't express its opposition to Sanders' proposal for a moratorium without including "an admission that it is a paid attack dog for Jeff Bezos," pointing to its required disclosure that Bezos' company is in fact investing billions of dollars in AI.
On social media, Sanders followed his response to the Post's attack with a video in which he doubled down on his objections to AI, despite the editorial board's accusation that he and others "grandstand" on the issue and its insistence that he should "be ecstatic about how much AI can help workers."
Sanders said in the video that "AI and robotics are a huge threat to the working class of this country."
"We have got to be prepared to say as loud and clear as we can that this technology is not just going to benefit the billionaires who own it," he said, "but it's going to work for the working families of our country."
"This court has all it needs to conclude that defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly's First Amendment freedoms."
A federal judge delivered a scathing ruling against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's effort to punish a Democratic US senator for warning members of the military against following unlawful orders.
US District Judge Richard Leon on Thursday granted a preliminary injunction that at least temporarily blocked Hegseth from punishing Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired US Navy captain who was one of several Democratic lawmakers to take part in a video that advised military service members that they had a duty to disobey President Donald Trump if he gave them unlawful orders.
In his ruling, Leon eviscerated Hegseth's efforts to reduce Kelly's retirement rank and pay simply for exercising his First Amendment rights.
While Leon acknowledged that active US service members do have certain restrictions on their freedom of speech, he said that these restrictions have never been applied to retired members of the US armed services.
"This court has all it needs to conclude that defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly's First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees," wrote Leon. "To say the least, our retired veterans deserve more respect from their government, and our constitution demands they receive it!"
The judge said he would be granting Kelly's request for an injunction because claims that his First Amendment rights were being violated were "likely to succeed on the merits," further noting that the senator has shown "irreparable harm" being done by Hegseth's efforts to censure him.
Leon concluded his ruling by imploring Hegseth to stop "trying to shrink the First Amendment liberties of retired service members," and instead "reflect and be grateful for the wisdom and expertise that retired service members have brought to public discussions and debate on military matters in our nation over the past 250 years."
Shortly after Leon's ruling, Kelly posted a video on social media in which he highlighted the threats posed by the Trump administration's efforts to silence dissent.
"Today, a federal court made clear that Pete Hegseth violated the Constitution when he tried to punish me for something I said," Kelly remarked. "But this case was never just about me. This administration was sending a message to millions of retired veterans that they too can be censured or demoted just for speaking out. That's why I couldn't let this stand."
Kelly went on to accuse the Trump administration of "cracking down on our rights and trying to make examples out of everyone they can."
Today a federal court made clear Pete Hegseth violated the Constitution when he tried to punish me for something I said.
This is a critical moment to show this administration they can't keep undermining Americans' rights.
I also know this might not be over yet, because Trump… pic.twitter.com/9dRe9pmeCd
— Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) February 12, 2026
Leon's ruling came less than two days after it was reported that Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now serving as US attorney for the District of Columbia, tried to get Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers criminally indicted on undisclosed charges before getting rejected by a DC grand jury.
According to a Wednesday report from NBC News, none of the grand jurors who heard evidence against the Democrats believed prosecutors had done enough to establish probable cause that the Democrats had committed a crime, leading to a rare unanimous rejection of an attempted federal prosecution.
Their boss, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, has said that videotaping officers on the job is a form of "doxing" and "violence."
The US Department of Homeland Security has claimed for months that filming immigration agents on the job constitutes a criminal offense. But under oath during a Senate Homeland Security Committee oversight hearing on Thursday, the leaders of immigration agencies under the department’s umbrella admitted this is not true.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), the chair of the committee, interrogated Todd Lyons, the acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); Rodney Scott, the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection (CBP); and Joseph Edlow, the director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) about the recent surge of agents in Minnesota, which has resulted in the killing of two US citizens since January.
He zeroed in on the case of Alex Pretti, the 37-year-old intensive care unit nurse who was shot by a pair of immigration agents on January 24, showing footage of the incident leading up to Pretti's killing, which DHS claimed was justified prior to any investigation taking place.
"So what we see is the beginning of the encounter with Alexander Pretti. He's filming in the middle of the street," Paul explained after rolling the tape.
The senator then asked Scott and Lyons, "Is filming of ICE or Border Patrol either an assault or a crime in any way?"
They both responded flatly, "No."
Courts have generally affirmed that filming law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment. But this admission by Lyons and Scott is a major deviation from what their parent agency has claimed.
Their boss, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, stated during a July press briefing that “violence” against DHS agents includes “doxing them” and “videotaping them where they’re at when they’re out on operations.”
Even in the wake of last month's shootings, DHS has held to this line, with spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin claiming that “videoing our officers in an effort to dox them and reveal their identities is a federal crime and a felony.”
Agents have been directed to treat those who film ICE as criminals—a DHS bulletin from June described filming at protests as "unlawful civil unrest" tactics and "threats."
Several videos out of Minnesota, Maine, and other places flooded by ICE have documented federal agents telling bystanders to stop recording and issuing threats against them or detaining them.
In one case, a bystander was told that because she was filming, she was going to be put in a "nice little database" and was now "considered a domestic terrorist."
Last month, a federal judge sided with a group of journalists in California who cited the June bulletin to argue that Noem had "established, sanctioned, and ratified an agency policy of treating video recording of DHS agents in public as a threat that may be responded to with force and addressed as a crime," in violation of the First Amendment.