Protesters gather outside of the headquarters of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management on February 3, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
Federal Workers Sue Over Musk-Led 'Exfiltration' of Data Using Illegal Server
"Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts," said a supporter of the new lawsuit. "The constitutional crisis is already here."
A pair of unnamed federal employees filed a lawsuit on Tuesday seeking to stop lackeys of billionaire Elon Musk from using an illegally connected server to "ingest and store vast quantities" of highly sensitive personal information about government workers and contractors.
The complaint and request for a temporary restraining order, first reported by Wired, was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and it marks the latest in a flurry of high-stakes legal actions aimed at countering Musk's lawless and hostile takeover of key federal agencies and operations.
The new lawsuit was filed against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), an obscure but important agency that has effectively been
seized by Musk associates.
"At some point after 20 January 2025," the complaint states, "OPM allowed unknown individuals to simply bypass its existing systems and security protocols and install one or more new systems to ingest and store vast quantities of [personally identifiable information] about Executive Branch employees (as well as an unknown number of contractors and Judicial Branch employees) for the stated purpose of being able to communicate directly with those individuals without involving other agencies."
"In installing these systems, OPM ignored entirely the rules Congress established in the E-Government Act of 2002 which would safeguard the personal data being transferred into and stored by these systems," the lawsuit continues. "In utilizing these systems to send numerous email messages to individuals across the Executive Branch and beyond, and then insisting that Executive Branch employees must reply by email to the same systems, OPM further exacerbated the situation."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it."
The complaint points to reporting from Caleb Ecarma and Judd Legum, who wrote Tuesday that "a new server being used to control [government databases] has been placed in a conference room" at OPM "that Musk's team is using as their command center."
An anonymous OPM worker described the server as "a piece of commercial hardware they believed was not obtained through the proper federal procurement process," Ecarma and Legum reported.
According to Reuters, "some senior career employees at OPM have had their access revoked to some of the department's data systems" including "a vast database called Enterprise Human Resources Integration, which contains dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades and length of service of government workers."
Sean Vitka, policy director at the Demand Progress Action Fund—an advocacy group that's supporting the new lawsuit—said in a statement Tuesday that "Elon Musk and his team's incompetent and rapid efforts are putting millions of Americans in danger."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it—all orchestrated by the richest man in the world, with billions on the line in other countries, including ones that have recently hacked exactly this kind of sensitive data," said Vitka. "Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts. The constitutional crisis is already here."
As the two federal employees brought their lawsuit, top Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded answers about the "server of unknown nature and origin" that was reportedly installed on OPM premises by Musk associates.
In a letter to Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell, Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) demanded the names of "the individuals who installed and/or accessed the equipment" and information on "whether they were OPM employees at the time of their installation/access of the equipment."
"At best, the Trump administration's actions at OPM to date demonstrate gross negligence, severe incompetence, and a chaotic disregard for the security of our government data and the countless services it enables our agencies to provide to the public," Connolly and Brown wrote. "At worst, we fear that Trump administration officials know full well that their actions threaten to break our government."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A pair of unnamed federal employees filed a lawsuit on Tuesday seeking to stop lackeys of billionaire Elon Musk from using an illegally connected server to "ingest and store vast quantities" of highly sensitive personal information about government workers and contractors.
The complaint and request for a temporary restraining order, first reported by Wired, was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and it marks the latest in a flurry of high-stakes legal actions aimed at countering Musk's lawless and hostile takeover of key federal agencies and operations.
The new lawsuit was filed against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), an obscure but important agency that has effectively been
seized by Musk associates.
"At some point after 20 January 2025," the complaint states, "OPM allowed unknown individuals to simply bypass its existing systems and security protocols and install one or more new systems to ingest and store vast quantities of [personally identifiable information] about Executive Branch employees (as well as an unknown number of contractors and Judicial Branch employees) for the stated purpose of being able to communicate directly with those individuals without involving other agencies."
"In installing these systems, OPM ignored entirely the rules Congress established in the E-Government Act of 2002 which would safeguard the personal data being transferred into and stored by these systems," the lawsuit continues. "In utilizing these systems to send numerous email messages to individuals across the Executive Branch and beyond, and then insisting that Executive Branch employees must reply by email to the same systems, OPM further exacerbated the situation."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it."
The complaint points to reporting from Caleb Ecarma and Judd Legum, who wrote Tuesday that "a new server being used to control [government databases] has been placed in a conference room" at OPM "that Musk's team is using as their command center."
An anonymous OPM worker described the server as "a piece of commercial hardware they believed was not obtained through the proper federal procurement process," Ecarma and Legum reported.
According to Reuters, "some senior career employees at OPM have had their access revoked to some of the department's data systems" including "a vast database called Enterprise Human Resources Integration, which contains dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades and length of service of government workers."
Sean Vitka, policy director at the Demand Progress Action Fund—an advocacy group that's supporting the new lawsuit—said in a statement Tuesday that "Elon Musk and his team's incompetent and rapid efforts are putting millions of Americans in danger."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it—all orchestrated by the richest man in the world, with billions on the line in other countries, including ones that have recently hacked exactly this kind of sensitive data," said Vitka. "Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts. The constitutional crisis is already here."
As the two federal employees brought their lawsuit, top Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded answers about the "server of unknown nature and origin" that was reportedly installed on OPM premises by Musk associates.
In a letter to Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell, Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) demanded the names of "the individuals who installed and/or accessed the equipment" and information on "whether they were OPM employees at the time of their installation/access of the equipment."
"At best, the Trump administration's actions at OPM to date demonstrate gross negligence, severe incompetence, and a chaotic disregard for the security of our government data and the countless services it enables our agencies to provide to the public," Connolly and Brown wrote. "At worst, we fear that Trump administration officials know full well that their actions threaten to break our government."
A pair of unnamed federal employees filed a lawsuit on Tuesday seeking to stop lackeys of billionaire Elon Musk from using an illegally connected server to "ingest and store vast quantities" of highly sensitive personal information about government workers and contractors.
The complaint and request for a temporary restraining order, first reported by Wired, was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and it marks the latest in a flurry of high-stakes legal actions aimed at countering Musk's lawless and hostile takeover of key federal agencies and operations.
The new lawsuit was filed against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), an obscure but important agency that has effectively been
seized by Musk associates.
"At some point after 20 January 2025," the complaint states, "OPM allowed unknown individuals to simply bypass its existing systems and security protocols and install one or more new systems to ingest and store vast quantities of [personally identifiable information] about Executive Branch employees (as well as an unknown number of contractors and Judicial Branch employees) for the stated purpose of being able to communicate directly with those individuals without involving other agencies."
"In installing these systems, OPM ignored entirely the rules Congress established in the E-Government Act of 2002 which would safeguard the personal data being transferred into and stored by these systems," the lawsuit continues. "In utilizing these systems to send numerous email messages to individuals across the Executive Branch and beyond, and then insisting that Executive Branch employees must reply by email to the same systems, OPM further exacerbated the situation."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it."
The complaint points to reporting from Caleb Ecarma and Judd Legum, who wrote Tuesday that "a new server being used to control [government databases] has been placed in a conference room" at OPM "that Musk's team is using as their command center."
An anonymous OPM worker described the server as "a piece of commercial hardware they believed was not obtained through the proper federal procurement process," Ecarma and Legum reported.
According to Reuters, "some senior career employees at OPM have had their access revoked to some of the department's data systems" including "a vast database called Enterprise Human Resources Integration, which contains dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades and length of service of government workers."
Sean Vitka, policy director at the Demand Progress Action Fund—an advocacy group that's supporting the new lawsuit—said in a statement Tuesday that "Elon Musk and his team's incompetent and rapid efforts are putting millions of Americans in danger."
"We are witnessing an unprecedented exfiltration and seizure of the most sensitive kinds of information by unelected, unvetted people with no experience, responsibility, or right to it—all orchestrated by the richest man in the world, with billions on the line in other countries, including ones that have recently hacked exactly this kind of sensitive data," said Vitka. "Millions of Americans and the collective interests of the United States desperately need emergency intervention from the courts. The constitutional crisis is already here."
As the two federal employees brought their lawsuit, top Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded answers about the "server of unknown nature and origin" that was reportedly installed on OPM premises by Musk associates.
In a letter to Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell, Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) demanded the names of "the individuals who installed and/or accessed the equipment" and information on "whether they were OPM employees at the time of their installation/access of the equipment."
"At best, the Trump administration's actions at OPM to date demonstrate gross negligence, severe incompetence, and a chaotic disregard for the security of our government data and the countless services it enables our agencies to provide to the public," Connolly and Brown wrote. "At worst, we fear that Trump administration officials know full well that their actions threaten to break our government."