American Electric Power's Mountaineer coal power plant was seen with a since-abandoned carbon capture unit in New Haven, West Virginia on October 30, 2009. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
Analysis Exposes Taxpayer Billions 'Wasted' on Dead-End Carbon Capture Schemes
Food & Water Watch said "this track record should elicit serious concern" as Congress dumps billions more into failed carbon capture technology.
An analysis published this week shows that past congressional efforts to bolster fossil fuel industry-backed carbon capture schemes have amounted to little more than a sinkhole of taxpayer money--a pertinent warning as Congress moves once again to pump billions of dollars into the failed technology as the climate crisis intensifies.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
As a cautionary tale, the report from Food & Water Watch points to the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a stimulus package that put forth $3.4 billion for the research and development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects.
The results weren't exactly encouraging. Food & Water Watch notes that "out of 11 large-scale demonstration projects selected by the Department of Energy (DOE), nine were funded by the ARRA and only two remain operational."
"Of the five commercial power plant projects," the analysis shows, "only one (Petra Nova) ever reached operation and Petra Nova faced serious challenges, forcing the plant to close after fewer than four years."
Food & Water Watch says "this track record should elicit serious concern," given that the recently approved Inflation Reduction Act "increases federal tax credits for CCS technology, putting even more public dollars on the line for a technology with a failed track record."
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, a law crafted in part by top Big Oil ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), also greenlights $2.1 billion in loans and grants for new CCS infrastructure, which fossil fuel companies have embraced in what environmentalists say is a cynical ploy to stave off effective climate action.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out," Food & Water Watch declared, "is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
In a press release, Food & Water Watch concisely summarized carbon capture's record: "Billions of wasted dollars."
One failed CCS initiative that Food & Water Watch examines in its analysis is a project that was supposed to be built in Manchin's home state. As the report notes, "American Electric Power (AEP) attempted to capture the CO2 emissions from a 235-megawatt coal electric power generator in West Virginia and inject the CO2 into geological storage near the facility."
"AEP withdrew from the project at the definition stage of development, after receiving over $16 million from the [Department of Energy]," the report explains. "AEP claimed that the project would not be viable without additional federal support or legislation limiting emissions. Though the DOE was willing to shoulder half the $668 million cost of the project, AEP was unable to force ratepayers to cover the other half. If completed, the CCS-equipped unit would have represented 18% of the electric capacity of the power plant."
Food & Water Watch has repeatedly expressed concerns about the Inflation Reduction Act's support for carbon capture, given its history of failure. In some cases, major carbon capture efforts in the United States have produced a net increase in carbon emissions.
That raises questions about the Inflation Reduction Act's potential to slash U.S. carbon emissions by 40%, a key claim of the law's proponents. As Food & Water Watch observed in an August analysis, estimates of the new law's emissions-slashing potential rest on "highly dubious predictions about the effectiveness of carbon capture, and the notion that the industry would see massive growth in just a matter of months."
In their latest report, the climate group argues that even supposed carbon capture success stories are highly questionable.
"Archer Daniels Midland's Decatur project, which received $141 million from the DOE and began operation in 2017, aims to sequester 1 million tons of CO2 per year from an ethanol plant in Decatur, Illinois," the report reads.
But "ADM's CCS facility only captures the emissions that are a byproduct of the fermentation process, leaving a wide range of uncaptured emissions from ethanol production," the analysis continues. "Food & Water Watch estimates that ADM's ethanol production at this facility requires 8.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 260 million kWh of electricity. Emissions from these sources are equal to 1.066 million metric tons per year and equal the emissions ADM plans to capture from the fermentation process."
"In 2020," the report adds, "ADM admitted that the technology to capture these emissions doesn't exist."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An analysis published this week shows that past congressional efforts to bolster fossil fuel industry-backed carbon capture schemes have amounted to little more than a sinkhole of taxpayer money--a pertinent warning as Congress moves once again to pump billions of dollars into the failed technology as the climate crisis intensifies.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
As a cautionary tale, the report from Food & Water Watch points to the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a stimulus package that put forth $3.4 billion for the research and development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects.
The results weren't exactly encouraging. Food & Water Watch notes that "out of 11 large-scale demonstration projects selected by the Department of Energy (DOE), nine were funded by the ARRA and only two remain operational."
"Of the five commercial power plant projects," the analysis shows, "only one (Petra Nova) ever reached operation and Petra Nova faced serious challenges, forcing the plant to close after fewer than four years."
Food & Water Watch says "this track record should elicit serious concern," given that the recently approved Inflation Reduction Act "increases federal tax credits for CCS technology, putting even more public dollars on the line for a technology with a failed track record."
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, a law crafted in part by top Big Oil ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), also greenlights $2.1 billion in loans and grants for new CCS infrastructure, which fossil fuel companies have embraced in what environmentalists say is a cynical ploy to stave off effective climate action.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out," Food & Water Watch declared, "is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
In a press release, Food & Water Watch concisely summarized carbon capture's record: "Billions of wasted dollars."
One failed CCS initiative that Food & Water Watch examines in its analysis is a project that was supposed to be built in Manchin's home state. As the report notes, "American Electric Power (AEP) attempted to capture the CO2 emissions from a 235-megawatt coal electric power generator in West Virginia and inject the CO2 into geological storage near the facility."
"AEP withdrew from the project at the definition stage of development, after receiving over $16 million from the [Department of Energy]," the report explains. "AEP claimed that the project would not be viable without additional federal support or legislation limiting emissions. Though the DOE was willing to shoulder half the $668 million cost of the project, AEP was unable to force ratepayers to cover the other half. If completed, the CCS-equipped unit would have represented 18% of the electric capacity of the power plant."
Food & Water Watch has repeatedly expressed concerns about the Inflation Reduction Act's support for carbon capture, given its history of failure. In some cases, major carbon capture efforts in the United States have produced a net increase in carbon emissions.
That raises questions about the Inflation Reduction Act's potential to slash U.S. carbon emissions by 40%, a key claim of the law's proponents. As Food & Water Watch observed in an August analysis, estimates of the new law's emissions-slashing potential rest on "highly dubious predictions about the effectiveness of carbon capture, and the notion that the industry would see massive growth in just a matter of months."
In their latest report, the climate group argues that even supposed carbon capture success stories are highly questionable.
"Archer Daniels Midland's Decatur project, which received $141 million from the DOE and began operation in 2017, aims to sequester 1 million tons of CO2 per year from an ethanol plant in Decatur, Illinois," the report reads.
But "ADM's CCS facility only captures the emissions that are a byproduct of the fermentation process, leaving a wide range of uncaptured emissions from ethanol production," the analysis continues. "Food & Water Watch estimates that ADM's ethanol production at this facility requires 8.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 260 million kWh of electricity. Emissions from these sources are equal to 1.066 million metric tons per year and equal the emissions ADM plans to capture from the fermentation process."
"In 2020," the report adds, "ADM admitted that the technology to capture these emissions doesn't exist."
An analysis published this week shows that past congressional efforts to bolster fossil fuel industry-backed carbon capture schemes have amounted to little more than a sinkhole of taxpayer money--a pertinent warning as Congress moves once again to pump billions of dollars into the failed technology as the climate crisis intensifies.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
As a cautionary tale, the report from Food & Water Watch points to the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a stimulus package that put forth $3.4 billion for the research and development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects.
The results weren't exactly encouraging. Food & Water Watch notes that "out of 11 large-scale demonstration projects selected by the Department of Energy (DOE), nine were funded by the ARRA and only two remain operational."
"Of the five commercial power plant projects," the analysis shows, "only one (Petra Nova) ever reached operation and Petra Nova faced serious challenges, forcing the plant to close after fewer than four years."
Food & Water Watch says "this track record should elicit serious concern," given that the recently approved Inflation Reduction Act "increases federal tax credits for CCS technology, putting even more public dollars on the line for a technology with a failed track record."
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, a law crafted in part by top Big Oil ally Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), also greenlights $2.1 billion in loans and grants for new CCS infrastructure, which fossil fuel companies have embraced in what environmentalists say is a cynical ploy to stave off effective climate action.
"What the fossil fuel industry hopes you won't find out," Food & Water Watch declared, "is carbon capture is already a failure of an experiment, funded with taxpayer money."
In a press release, Food & Water Watch concisely summarized carbon capture's record: "Billions of wasted dollars."
One failed CCS initiative that Food & Water Watch examines in its analysis is a project that was supposed to be built in Manchin's home state. As the report notes, "American Electric Power (AEP) attempted to capture the CO2 emissions from a 235-megawatt coal electric power generator in West Virginia and inject the CO2 into geological storage near the facility."
"AEP withdrew from the project at the definition stage of development, after receiving over $16 million from the [Department of Energy]," the report explains. "AEP claimed that the project would not be viable without additional federal support or legislation limiting emissions. Though the DOE was willing to shoulder half the $668 million cost of the project, AEP was unable to force ratepayers to cover the other half. If completed, the CCS-equipped unit would have represented 18% of the electric capacity of the power plant."
Food & Water Watch has repeatedly expressed concerns about the Inflation Reduction Act's support for carbon capture, given its history of failure. In some cases, major carbon capture efforts in the United States have produced a net increase in carbon emissions.
That raises questions about the Inflation Reduction Act's potential to slash U.S. carbon emissions by 40%, a key claim of the law's proponents. As Food & Water Watch observed in an August analysis, estimates of the new law's emissions-slashing potential rest on "highly dubious predictions about the effectiveness of carbon capture, and the notion that the industry would see massive growth in just a matter of months."
In their latest report, the climate group argues that even supposed carbon capture success stories are highly questionable.
"Archer Daniels Midland's Decatur project, which received $141 million from the DOE and began operation in 2017, aims to sequester 1 million tons of CO2 per year from an ethanol plant in Decatur, Illinois," the report reads.
But "ADM's CCS facility only captures the emissions that are a byproduct of the fermentation process, leaving a wide range of uncaptured emissions from ethanol production," the analysis continues. "Food & Water Watch estimates that ADM's ethanol production at this facility requires 8.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 260 million kWh of electricity. Emissions from these sources are equal to 1.066 million metric tons per year and equal the emissions ADM plans to capture from the fermentation process."
"In 2020," the report adds, "ADM admitted that the technology to capture these emissions doesn't exist."