SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Union leader Christian Smalls celebrates with Amazon workers following the April 1, 2022 vote for the unionization of the JFK8 Amazon warehouse in New York. (Photo: Andrea Renault/AFP via Getty Images)
'Great Day for Labor': NLRB Rejects Amazon Attempt to Overturn Union Win
"This was an outrageous union-busting campaign by Amazon and we're demanding the company come to the table to bargain," said an attorney for the Amazon Labor Union.
Sep 02, 2022
The National Labor Relations Board on Thursday completely rejected Amazon's attempt to dispute and overturn a historic union victory in New York earlier this year, paving the way for the JFK8 warehouse in Staten Island to become the company's first-ever certified union shop in the United States.
In a new filing, the NLRB officer who presided over weeks of virtual hearings on Amazon's election objections concluded that the corporation's protests against the union's landmark victory "should be overruled in their entirety."
"The employer has not met its burden of establishing that Region 29 [of the NLRB], the petitioner, or any third parties have engaged in objectionable conduct affecting the results of the election," the federal labor official wrote, dismissing Amazon's claims that the union committed "electioneering in the polling area" and "distributed marijuana to employees in exchange for their support," along with a slew of other allegations.
Christian Smalls, president of the Amazon Labor Union (ALU), said in response to the decision that "today is a great day for labor."
"After dealing with all of that virtual court, it feels good to finally have celebratory news," Smalls said in a statement. "We're hoping that the NLRB certifies it so we can get some rights in the building and protect workers."
Cassio Mendoza, ALU's communications director, echoed Smalls, saying "it is our hope that the Regional Director for Region 28 can expedite our certification and that the NLRB enforces Amazon's legal obligation to negotiate with the workers of the ALU."
Amazon, which used aggressive union-busting tactics in its failed attempt to fend off the JFK8 organizing drive, said it "strongly" disagrees with the NLRB's decision and plans to appeal, claiming that "the NLRB and the ALU improperly influenced the outcome of the election."
Amazon has two weeks to file its objections. If the company's last-ditch effort fails, it will be required by federal law to begin contract negotiations with the union, which could take months or years.
"This was an outrageous union-busting campaign by Amazon," ALU attorney Seth Goldstein told the Washington Post, "and we're demanding the company come to the table to bargain."
As veteran labor reporter Steven Greenhouse wrote for The Guardian on Thursday, "Agreeing on a first contract quickly is a high-stakes matter."
"If unionized workers at Starbucks, Amazon, or Trader Joe's facilities quickly reach first contracts that contain impressive raises and benefits, that will no doubt inspire workers at many other Starbucks, Amazon, and Trader Joe's operations to seek to unionize," Greenhouse observed. "But if companies manage to drag out reaching a first contract for a year or two or three, that could send a strong signal that unionization might not be the boon workers had hoped for."
"There is no real disincentive to prevent companies from dragging out negotiations indefinitely," Greenhouse noted, "because federal labor law contains no financial penalties against companies that bargain in bad faith to delay ever reaching an agreement."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The National Labor Relations Board on Thursday completely rejected Amazon's attempt to dispute and overturn a historic union victory in New York earlier this year, paving the way for the JFK8 warehouse in Staten Island to become the company's first-ever certified union shop in the United States.
In a new filing, the NLRB officer who presided over weeks of virtual hearings on Amazon's election objections concluded that the corporation's protests against the union's landmark victory "should be overruled in their entirety."
"The employer has not met its burden of establishing that Region 29 [of the NLRB], the petitioner, or any third parties have engaged in objectionable conduct affecting the results of the election," the federal labor official wrote, dismissing Amazon's claims that the union committed "electioneering in the polling area" and "distributed marijuana to employees in exchange for their support," along with a slew of other allegations.
Christian Smalls, president of the Amazon Labor Union (ALU), said in response to the decision that "today is a great day for labor."
"After dealing with all of that virtual court, it feels good to finally have celebratory news," Smalls said in a statement. "We're hoping that the NLRB certifies it so we can get some rights in the building and protect workers."
Cassio Mendoza, ALU's communications director, echoed Smalls, saying "it is our hope that the Regional Director for Region 28 can expedite our certification and that the NLRB enforces Amazon's legal obligation to negotiate with the workers of the ALU."
Amazon, which used aggressive union-busting tactics in its failed attempt to fend off the JFK8 organizing drive, said it "strongly" disagrees with the NLRB's decision and plans to appeal, claiming that "the NLRB and the ALU improperly influenced the outcome of the election."
Amazon has two weeks to file its objections. If the company's last-ditch effort fails, it will be required by federal law to begin contract negotiations with the union, which could take months or years.
"This was an outrageous union-busting campaign by Amazon," ALU attorney Seth Goldstein told the Washington Post, "and we're demanding the company come to the table to bargain."
As veteran labor reporter Steven Greenhouse wrote for The Guardian on Thursday, "Agreeing on a first contract quickly is a high-stakes matter."
"If unionized workers at Starbucks, Amazon, or Trader Joe's facilities quickly reach first contracts that contain impressive raises and benefits, that will no doubt inspire workers at many other Starbucks, Amazon, and Trader Joe's operations to seek to unionize," Greenhouse observed. "But if companies manage to drag out reaching a first contract for a year or two or three, that could send a strong signal that unionization might not be the boon workers had hoped for."
"There is no real disincentive to prevent companies from dragging out negotiations indefinitely," Greenhouse noted, "because federal labor law contains no financial penalties against companies that bargain in bad faith to delay ever reaching an agreement."
The National Labor Relations Board on Thursday completely rejected Amazon's attempt to dispute and overturn a historic union victory in New York earlier this year, paving the way for the JFK8 warehouse in Staten Island to become the company's first-ever certified union shop in the United States.
In a new filing, the NLRB officer who presided over weeks of virtual hearings on Amazon's election objections concluded that the corporation's protests against the union's landmark victory "should be overruled in their entirety."
"The employer has not met its burden of establishing that Region 29 [of the NLRB], the petitioner, or any third parties have engaged in objectionable conduct affecting the results of the election," the federal labor official wrote, dismissing Amazon's claims that the union committed "electioneering in the polling area" and "distributed marijuana to employees in exchange for their support," along with a slew of other allegations.
Christian Smalls, president of the Amazon Labor Union (ALU), said in response to the decision that "today is a great day for labor."
"After dealing with all of that virtual court, it feels good to finally have celebratory news," Smalls said in a statement. "We're hoping that the NLRB certifies it so we can get some rights in the building and protect workers."
Cassio Mendoza, ALU's communications director, echoed Smalls, saying "it is our hope that the Regional Director for Region 28 can expedite our certification and that the NLRB enforces Amazon's legal obligation to negotiate with the workers of the ALU."
Amazon, which used aggressive union-busting tactics in its failed attempt to fend off the JFK8 organizing drive, said it "strongly" disagrees with the NLRB's decision and plans to appeal, claiming that "the NLRB and the ALU improperly influenced the outcome of the election."
Amazon has two weeks to file its objections. If the company's last-ditch effort fails, it will be required by federal law to begin contract negotiations with the union, which could take months or years.
"This was an outrageous union-busting campaign by Amazon," ALU attorney Seth Goldstein told the Washington Post, "and we're demanding the company come to the table to bargain."
As veteran labor reporter Steven Greenhouse wrote for The Guardian on Thursday, "Agreeing on a first contract quickly is a high-stakes matter."
"If unionized workers at Starbucks, Amazon, or Trader Joe's facilities quickly reach first contracts that contain impressive raises and benefits, that will no doubt inspire workers at many other Starbucks, Amazon, and Trader Joe's operations to seek to unionize," Greenhouse observed. "But if companies manage to drag out reaching a first contract for a year or two or three, that could send a strong signal that unionization might not be the boon workers had hoped for."
"There is no real disincentive to prevent companies from dragging out negotiations indefinitely," Greenhouse noted, "because federal labor law contains no financial penalties against companies that bargain in bad faith to delay ever reaching an agreement."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.